Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static

Hi, On Tuesday 13 October 2015 05:08 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > HI > How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings > in my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the > series? This series has not been merged yet. So you can fix this patch. Thanks

Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static

HI How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings in my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series? On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu --- phy-exynos-ufs.c |6 +++---

Re: [kbuild-all] [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:58PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > HI > How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings in > my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series? Alim, you can simply fold it into your patch. Thanks, Fengguang > On

[RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu --- phy-exynos-ufs.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c +++