Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: Hi Linus, James might still be in the process of sending this your way. However, given the proximity to -rc1, my reasoning for sending this directly is: 1/ It provides a tangible speed up for a non-esoteric use case (laptop resume):

Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:20 AM, James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote: I also don't see this in linux-next, unless I'm not looking in the right place, so it would be a bit of a risk adding it just before -rc1. .. but it sounds like you're not against it? I'll pull it -

Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: This has been the biggest (by far) merge window so far, afaik. Might as well take this too. Actually, I take that by far back. In fact it's not even the biggest one (yet). It looks like 3.10-rc1 was worse in