On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 12:15 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:20 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:00 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
As another data point, it looks like we may be doing a SEND DIAGNOSTIC
command specifying the default self-test in addition to the
On 12/05/2012 03:20 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:00 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
As another data point, it looks like we may be doing a SEND DIAGNOSTIC
command specifying the default self-test in addition to the background
short self-test. This seems a bit risky and
On Dec 6, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@genband.com wrote:
So it turns out that our problems are intermittently triggered when running
the default self test. This agrees with the statement in sg_senddiag to not
do foreground self-tests on disks with mounted filesystems.
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:00 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
As another data point, it looks like we may be doing a SEND DIAGNOSTIC
command specifying the default self-test in addition to the background
short self-test. This seems a bit risky and excessive to me, but
apparently the guy that wrote
On 12/05/2012 04:20 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:00 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
As another data point, it looks like we may be doing a SEND DIAGNOSTIC
command specifying the default self-test in addition to the background
short self-test. This seems a bit risky and
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 06:41 -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I don't think that the basic stat gathering (smartctl -a ) has this kind
of
impact, but am worried about the running of the diagnostics,
Right, that's what I was trying to say above. Anything that just reads
existing data is fine.
On 12/03/2012 03:53 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 12/03/2012 04:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it sounds like this is a better
topic for the
On 12/04/2012 05:00 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 03:53 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 12/03/2012 04:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it sounds like this is a better
topic for the linux-scsi or linux-ide list where most of the low level
storage people lurk :)
Okay,
On 12/03/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it sounds like this is a better
topic for the linux-scsi or linux-ide list where most of the
On 12/03/2012 03:21 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it sounds like this is a better
topic for the
On 12/03/2012 04:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it sounds like this is a better
topic for the linux-scsi or linux-ide list where most of the low
On 12/03/2012 02:36 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 03:21 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 12/03/2012 02:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I jumped into this thread late - can you repost detail on the specific
drive and HBA used here? In any case, it
13 matches
Mail list logo
