On 05/23/2017 04:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I tried to look up that commit:
>
> 48ae8484e9fc ("scsi: sg: don't return bogus Sg_requests")
>
> but that isn't in Linus' tree. Even searched for just the title, still
> didn't find anything.
It's queued up in Martin's tree [1].
>
> I'm assuming
On 05/23/2017 08:25 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 05/23/2017 04:15 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Add some code to the framework that allows you to get the corresponding
>> SG device for a SCSI block device? Make that part of the prepare, skip
>> the test if the block device isn't a SCSI dev.
>
>
On 05/23/2017 04:15 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Add some code to the framework that allows you to get the corresponding
> SG device for a SCSI block device? Make that part of the prepare, skip
> the test if the block device isn't a SCSI dev.
Well the code is already there (in patch 2/3).
I'll pack
On 05/23/2017 12:58 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 07:59 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> This looks much better, thanks! One question for you: is there any value
>> in running this on specific test devices (i.e., changing test() to
>> test_device() and using "$TEST_DEV" instead of a
On 05/22/2017 07:59 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> This looks much better, thanks! One question for you: is there any value
> in running this on specific test devices (i.e., changing test() to
> test_device() and using "$TEST_DEV" instead of a scsi-debug device), or
> would it be a waste of time since
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:55:31PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Add a regression test for commit 48ae8484e9fc ("scsi: sg: don't return
> bogus Sg_requests"). This is a general protection fault triggered by
> syzcaller via issuing bogus read(2)s on the /dev/sg devices.
>
> Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo
