Hi Paul and Eric,
Do you guys have any objections to dropping the hijack_pid() and
hijack_cgroup() parts of sys_hijack, leaving just hijack_ns() (see
below for discussion)?
Thanks!
Mark.
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:38 -0600,
On Nov 29, 2007 6:08 PM, Mark Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul and Eric,
Do you guys have any objections to dropping the hijack_pid() and
hijack_cgroup() parts of sys_hijack, leaving just hijack_ns() (see
below for discussion)?
hijack_ns() is the main bit that I care about anyway, so
Mark Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Paul and Eric,
Do you guys have any objections to dropping the hijack_pid() and
hijack_cgroup() parts of sys_hijack, leaving just hijack_ns() (see
below for discussion)?
I need to step back and study what is being proposed.
My gut feeling is that
