On Wed 20 Jun 2007 09:11:18 NZST +1200, Roger Searle wrote:
I had followed the route via model=LCD,[EMAIL PROTECTED] and then edited the
xorg.conf modelname and vendorname lines.
Those strings are just identifiers, like variable names in a programming
language. Rolling your head on the
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:14:48 +1200
Roger Searle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have managed to partially configure the settings for an LCD
monitor that is rated at 1440x900 @60Hz (from the manual's specs - an
AOC 193FW). I did so by using SuSE's Graphics Card Monitor tool
in Yast. This got
Hi, I have managed to partially configure the settings for an LCD
monitor that is rated at 1440x900 @60Hz (from the manual's specs - an
AOC 193FW). I did so by using SuSE's Graphics Card Monitor tool in
Yast.
Good.
This got me as far as getting 1440x900, but the only refresh
options
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Hi, I have managed to partially configure the settings for an LCD
monitor that is rated at 1440x900 @60Hz (from the manual's specs - an
AOC 193FW). I did so by using SuSE's Graphics Card Monitor tool in
Yast.
Good.
This got me as far as getting 1440x900,
Thanks for all the replies! 3 great commands I didn't know about. And I'm
sure I'll get better picture as soon as I get a dvi extension and dispense
with the vga cable it's currently running on.
Here are 4 more you might find useful:-
( As root )
X -help
X -configureprobe for
On Wed, June 20, 2007 9:11 am, Roger Searle wrote:
I had followed the route via model=LCD,[EMAIL PROTECTED] and then edited the
xorg.conf modelname and vendorname lines.
xwininfo -root
(doesn't tell me anything on refresh rate?)
No the purpose of xwininfo was to make sure you were
Hi, I have managed to partially configure the settings for an LCD
monitor that is rated at 1440x900 @60Hz (from the manual's specs - an
AOC 193FW). I did so by using SuSE's Graphics Card Monitor tool in
Yast. This got me as far as getting 1440x900, but the only refresh
options available
I would be looking to see if sax has wrongly set up something which is
restricting the X server from running at the higher refresh rate. However
the obvious candidates (HorizSync and VertRefresh) are correct according
to the specs here:
