On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:54:17 + (GMT), Ramesh Chhaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes Sir ,
u was right that I was missing that payload = line in configuration :)
So I have aded that line
and also enabled STD_FLASH
and ELF_BOOT
options and also added
PAY_LOAD_SIZE = 64KB
and
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Richard Smith wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:54:17 + (GMT), Ramesh Chhaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes Sir ,
u was right that I was missing that payload = line in configuration :)
So I have aded that line
and also enabled STD_FLASH
and ELF_BOOT
Second thing I have got the BIOS writer guide for STPC
So If I think I changes the replaces the code of STPC_ELITE
for that of STPC_ATLAS then I can make it for STPC_ATLAS
If you are going to have to do a lot of re-write work I encourage you
to start over with V2. V1 is a dead end
this is a clear FAQ entry.
For v1 yes but not for v2 and most of our docs now are all for v2. I
think I would still make v1 people ask so we can tell them not to use
v1.
--
Richard A. Smith
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Richard Smith wrote:
think I would still make v1 people ask so we can tell them not to use
v1.
ah, good point. Hey richard, previous letter, question is:
Q. Should I use V1?
A. Your previous letter
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing
Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Second thing I have got the BIOS writer guide for STPC
So If I think I changes the replaces the code of STPC_ELITE
for that of STPC_ATLAS then I can make it for STPC_ATLAS
If you are going to have to do a lot of re-write work I encourage you
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:53:22 + (GMT), Ramesh Chhaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using tulip.zelf as payload that I have taken
from the rom-o-matic
I have copied this file to the place of linux kernel
But when i compile it ,it gives eorror.
6+0 records
7 matches
Mail list logo
