On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Jeff Garzik j...@garzik.org wrote:
3) As a result, Timur's 'ahci' is no longer receiving interrupts. Presumably
this means that BOTH of the following conditions are true
a) INTX is disabled
b) MSI is not available
Today I am thinking we should
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 01:32 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Jeff Garzik j...@garzik.org wrote:
3) As a result, Timur's 'ahci' is no longer receiving interrupts. Presumably
this means that BOTH of the following conditions are true
a) INTX is disabled
b) MSI is not available
Today I am thinking we should
Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 19:36 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... that means intx isn't set by default. I'm not sure what is
the right thing to do here. I think it's something which should be
handled by the
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
Have you confirmed that INTX is disabled before that call?
How do I do that?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Timur Tabi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au
wrote:
Have you confirmed that INTX is disabled before that call?
How do I do that?
Running lspci -nnvvvxxx before loading the driver should be enough.
--
tejun
Tejun Heo wrote:
Running lspci -nnvvvxxx before loading the driver should be enough.
That might be difficult. My root file system is on my SATA drive.
It'll be a while before I can build an NFS rootfs.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
Timur Tabi wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Running lspci -nnvvvxxx before loading the driver should be enough.
That might be difficult. My root file system is on my SATA drive.
It'll be a while before I can build an NFS rootfs.
Yeah, right. The following patch should do the trick then.
diff
Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, right. The following patch should do the trick then.
Thanks, I appreciate it. I get this output:
XXX PCI_COMMAND=0x407
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Timur Tabi wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, right. The following patch should do the trick then.
Thanks, I appreciate it. I get this output:
XXX PCI_COMMAND=0x407
^
Yeah, that's INTX disable. Strange that the controller has the bit
set on boot. I'm curious where
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... for now,
I think it would be best to revert the original change. Jeff, can you
please do that?
Actually, give me a few days before you do that. A colleague gave me
some suggestions to debug this.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... for now,
I think it would be best to revert the original change. Jeff, can you
please do that?
Actually, give me a few days before you do that. A colleague gave
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... for now,
I think it would be best to revert the original change. Jeff, can
you
please do that?
Actually,
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... for now,
I think it would be best to revert the original
On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... for
Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... for now,
I think it would be best to
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 19:36 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... that means intx isn't set by default. I'm not sure what is
the right thing to do here. I think it's something which should be
handled by the PCI layer. Oh well,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
Can you post some more details, or point us at a thread?
http://marc.info/?t=12391165216r=1w=2
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 19:36 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hmmm... that means intx isn't set by default. I'm not sure what is
the right thing to do here. I think it's something which should be
handled by the PCI layer. Oh well,
19 matches
Mail list logo
