[REBOL] 2.2 preliminary docs??? Re:

1999-11-26 Thread robert . muench
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 4:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] 2.2 preliminary docs??? http://www.rebol.com/manual/ BTW: Would it be possible for the Rebol team to create an archive Rebol or

[REBOL] 2.2 preliminary docs??? Re:(2)

1999-11-26 Thread anon_emouse
In article 000901bf37e4$3bfc39c0$732de195@SW1DEV, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes BTW: Would it be possible for the Rebol team to create an archive Rebol or ZIP and provide it for downloading? There are some people here having to pay while they are connected... Robert You could spider that directory

[REBOL] cgi

1999-11-26 Thread brand
hello, I just discovered Rebol last week and have become a little obsessed with its simple beauty. Hence I want to re-write all my perl scripts and bin it for good. I've been desperately tring to get rebol cgi support set up on my macintosh and a linux box. To no avail. I've never had to

[REBOL] virtual pop server Re:(5)

1999-11-26 Thread mailinglists
Hi everyone! I'm probablyway to late with this post, since I don't have daily internet access anymore, nor daily Rebol exposure, it's great to see the list so alive! All those new users, even from India, hurrah! But anyway, on to the problem: William wrote: My username is

[REBOL] Pros and cons Re:(5)

1999-11-26 Thread giesse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... You should be able to find the messages on rebol.org; the subject was "Context" or perhaps "REBOL contexts"... BTW, I'm sorry I didn't have the time to dig back those messages in the last days. Most of them are in the first thread

[REBOL] Fw: [Web_Dialect] Dialects and what I thought about them this afternoon Re:

1999-11-26 Thread giesse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been thinking some more about dialects this afternoon - so I thought it best to keep on this topic... ^_^ :-) [...] It's very similar to what I did when I started to implement a dialect to send control sequences to ViNCEd terminal (on the Amiga); I never finished

[REBOL] Encouraging functional programming

1999-11-26 Thread a142808
Elan said: I think Jeff's example (subject: [REBOL] Functional programming in REBOL Re:): use [pod][ do pod: func [x][ any [all [zero? x 1] all [odd? x x * pod x - 1] pod x - 1] ] 20 ] which, when executed

[REBOL] Private attributes

1999-11-26 Thread lmecir
Hi, Rebols! tried this: trial: func [par] [ do func [/local p] [ p: par make object! [ prt: func [] [print p] ] ] ] trial2: func [par /local p] [ p: par make object! [ prt: func [] [print p] ] ] with the following results: a: trial 1 a/prt 1 b: trial 2 b/prt 2 a/prt 1 c:

[REBOL] Encouraging functional programming Re:

1999-11-26 Thread icimjs
Hi John, REBOL gets a stack overflow, yet the obvious `imperative' version of the program produces the correct answer. If you consider a data set of `dozens' or `hundreds' of elements to be the limits of `reasonable', then, yes, REBOL does just fine. I routinely use datasets of `thousands' or

[REBOL] Encouraging functional programming Re:(2)

1999-11-26 Thread erich
Was it Ingo who mentioned that tail recursion had been removed from the current REBOL implementation and asked when it would be returned? That should take care of the stack overflow problem. The problem is a result of an incomplete implementation of REBOL (missing tail recursion) and I don't

[REBOL] Private attributes Re:

1999-11-26 Thread icimjs
Hi Ladislav, At 06:32 PM 11/26/99 +0100, you wrote: Hi, Rebols! tried this: trial: func [par] [ do func [/local p] [ p: par make object! [ prt: func [] [print p] ] ] ] trial2: func [par /local p] [ p: par make object! [

[REBOL] Private attributes Re:(2)

1999-11-26 Thread lmecir
Elan, THX for explanation. Sorry for the inconvenience, I didn't use my computer to send the last e-mail. Ladislav

[REBOL] Encouraging functional programming Re:

1999-11-26 Thread 70740 . 503
John, I don't know what functional code is. However the following example shows the calculation of the product of successive odd numbers for quite a range. What kind of code is it? Jerry source test test: func [n /local x z][ x: array 0 for i 1 n 1 [insert x 2 * i + 1] z: 1

[REBOL] Accessing header fields Re:

1999-11-26 Thread Al . Bri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a small script named t04.r with a header like: REBOL [ Title: " test " Author: " ww " ] this is loaded with do %t04.r or do load %t04.r I have tried to access the header fields with many variations of Title mold

[REBOL] Interface and Implementation Re:(3)

1999-11-26 Thread icimjs
Hi Andrew, I had written: Which part surprises you? to which you replied That Interface/Test returns the value of 't! In C++, this wouldn't work, as the function 'Test_Implementation wouldn't be able to find 't in 'Interface. It's disturbing to me as a C++ programmer, but viewing it as a

[REBOL] Q on Array of Objects

1999-11-26 Thread wwink2
I am considering writing an app that would create several hundred or a few thousand copies of a single object. One way to keep track of them is to use an array. A script that tests this syntax is below along with a run which does a "print mold" on the array. It appears that the

[REBOL] Encouraging functional programming Re:(3)

1999-11-26 Thread wwink2
My understanding was that tail recursion ( or its optimized implementation ) gives a (properly written) recursive program the efficiency of an iterative program. Thus it is a very desirable capability to build into a language which is intended to use a lot of recursive program structures.