This is a HTML/Javascript question, but I think the answer is to use an
onload=YourButton.click() handler in the HTML body statement.
Syntax may be off.
Netscape's Javascript reference is here
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsref/index.htm
.
*** REPLY
On 10/7/2000 at 8:31 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have a sense of deja vu here though and I'm wondering if
what we see may have something to do with possibility that if rebol is
funded with venture capital, sometimes the investors have influence
comparable in weight to that of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"fragile" - "arguments not vetted, you can crash this if
you don't play well with others"
"robust" - "good faith argument checking done, but there
may be some gotchas left"
"ironclad" - "we've collectively banged on this
Thoughts, suggestions, comments welcome!
How abut if we start with a REBOL Planet directory for working scripts,
that includes a category for re-usable functions and objects?
e.g. http://cgi.resourceindex.com/
maybe using Elan's DBMS for a backend.
And promote along with with it a
On 10/6/2000 at 4:11 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We pay too much attention to wow factor of /View, while Core
technology is not further advanced (parser, modules, bugs, lack of
handling of components, etc.)
I strongly agree that REBOL advocacy and hero-worship tend to blind us
to the key things
Are you able to test or replicate the problem so we know when it's
fixed?
My first suspect for a SSI/CGI bug would be the random statement.
A related question would be if the behaviour recurs if it's setup to
print a standalone page (with and without the random statement).
Of course that
On 10/7/2000 at 12:13 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... sometimes I feel we (community) are excluded from the
communication about rebol, even in areas where NDAs, strategy e.c. is
not concerned ...
This is very true. No other software community is so secretive that the
principals won't even
On 9/28/2000 at 7:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Python and Perl are on the CD image, it is a pity REBOL didn't get
onto it too
Or the latest Red Hat and Debian distributions, for that matter.
-Ted.
Hi Jeff,
On 9/27/2000 at 11:11 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oracle accounts are the most likely to have a generous budget ... ?
;-)
but also the most likely to have a stingy viewpoint on which new
softwares are running their enterprise ...
My guess would be that it was to make /Express
On 9/28/2000 at 12:22 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By an interpreter I take it you mean parsing REBOL code and mapping
REBOL commands to JAVA commands and executing them?
A working example of this product category might be the jPhython
project http://jpython.org/ .
Like REBOL, Python is an
I'm not saying limit it strictly to coding questions and examples,
because I think discussions on collaborative efforts to build a few
killer apps is fruitful, but maybe there should be another list for all
the discussions about what RT 'should' do.
I also strongly agree. Realistically, there
Under the heading compare and contrast, I would offer the following
clips from the Python FAQ-o-Matic. While a popular topic for
speculation, I don't believe whether or how the REBOL interpreter
precompiles code has never been clarified. Of course, Carl's recent
mention of the mysterious 'compile
On 9/24/2000 at 1:15 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO I think it is ridiculous to think that "Open Source" projects
can be cloned by each newbie-programmer.
This is an important point. What many people who write code overlook is
that the marketplace still considers software applications an
On 9/24/2000 at 4:06 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every computer will be both server and client without requiring a
computer science degree to configure and protect. You
can't do all this using the status quo, but it can all be done, and is
in development right now.
It wasn't so long ago that
On 9/24/2000 at 10:19 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yet piracy of the "code" isn't really a problem
Has it ever been a real "problem"? (Damages you could prove.) Or just a
bogey-man?
-Ted.
On 9/24/2000 at 6:50 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that if there were full attention to these details it would
be very successful, as there is a lot to like about the product. It is
surprisingly useful for web page design, for example, but the weird
aspects made me leave it after a while.
On 9/24/2000 at 11:15 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell me. What killer app, what "must have" will any new OS bring that
won't be ported by Gates and others within weeks as they did with
browsers, e-mail, servers etc.? But with one HUGE difference. The new
OS starts off with 0% of the market
Since email is step 1 of a collaborative work environment, those set
on doing that should help them out.
Personally, I'd say that a discussion board/BBS system would be step
one, with file archives and email alerts being step two.
A really good environment would be standards-based, so you
On 9/23/2000 at 12:30 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to put together a system to send out press releases
using free Perl/CGI scripts as a prototype. What a hairball!
Here's a script I use to manage a small mailing list.
---
#!\usr\bin\rebol
REBOL[ Title: "ATW Script Mailing
On 9/23/2000 at 11:29 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I am not ready for REBOL, would anybody be interested in
converting the code into REBOL. If so, just ask for the code in
either C, Pascal or Java. I have all of them on hand. The code in REBOL
will remain in public, of course.
I would be
On 9/23/2000 at 9:01 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now there's a real good one. Take a look at the Ultimate BBS
(http://infopop.com), which is written in PERL and is
like 250k worth of scripts in size. The equivalent REBOL code
should be like 50k or something.
I actually
On 9/23/2000 at 12:14 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yet there is no Rebol/DOS platform?
The conventional wisdom would be that people who are using DOS
generally aren't shopping for new software.
This is also a reason commercial applications are built for the
latest-and-greatest computers
On 9/21/2000 at 10:22 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't one of there an Open Source mantra about running around
spreading FUD? (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) ;-)
I know you're kidding me Jeff, and that you and the others in the
trenches are doing your best, but, since the door's been opened, I
Here's a few notes I had on other suggested improvements to SELMA. Most
of them aren't my own.
--
Put a line at the end of each email, showing how to unsubscribe. For
example: "To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject line containing only UNSUBSCRIBE."
On 9/22/2000 at 7:58 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to develop a collaborative work environment tool with REBOL.
There is nothing done yet, so that if some of you want to join me
please contact me.
I can't offer to do any coding right now, but here's a description of
my favorite
On 9/22/2000 at 1:41 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web Site Control Utility: These type of things are growing in
popularity, the next killer app? Could be. I could see this being
easy
to create with REBOL as well, of course depending on how in depth you
wish to go. Could you explain more about
On 9/22/2000 at 11:47 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which problems in a corporate context are not being tackled with
existing technologies because of the limitation inherent in these
technologies? Can REBOL be used as a basis to provide solutions to
problems that are not being tackled because it
Does the chart at http://www.rebol.com/cmd_osmatrix.html say that
the only database connectivity available under Linux is Oracle?
Like most of the world, I need to make a direct connect to MySQL on
Linux. (ODBC need not apply.)
And I also take it that Command is not available for FreeBSD, or
On 9/21/2000 at 12:40 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I think we should let things play out a bit longer before
showing everyone how its done.
Python, PHP, MySQL are all wildly popular, and Open Source. No mammoth
marketing team has swept in and taken them over.
Your arguments might
On 9/21/2000 at 4:26 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The finite resources corporate demands on REBOL TECHNOLOGIES inc.
are the biggest bottleneck to the future direction speed of
development of REBOL, as a language technology.
Personally, I believe the real bottleneck is REBOL Corporate's
On 9/21/2000 at 4:03 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see an inherent mistrust of closed source products amongst many
developers because a closed source product can be taken away as quickly
as it is given. It's kind of like not wanting to commit to a
relationship with someone who hides things
On 9/21/2000 at 4:03 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RT depends on developers to create applications to show that REBOL is
a viable alternative.
In real life, it's never been about which platform is better, it's
always been about which applications are better.
Java was ignored for years
On 9/21/2000 at 3:38 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Although, If I remember correctly, MySQL is a business, free for non
profitable use or something.
They were on the fence for a while, especially as to the NT version,
but it did go full open source this year.
But, as far
On 9/22/2000 at 8:51 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are starting to sound a little disheartened in your recents
posts.. :-(
Oh, I've always been a little cranky, just haven't been posting as
much. The sad part is I'm still saying the same things I said a year
ago. My concern is that people get
Java came in later in the game, successfully aquiring the cross
platform category, but too late and under equiped to gain popularity
anywhere else. Such as my father always says, "a day late and a dollar
short."
Java was actually developed and available for many years before it
became popular.
On 9/20/2000 at 9:08 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think? My guess is that there is far too much
uninformed interest in doing things in Perl and that my Perl
inmplementation of REBOL/Core is the only way to hide the wolf of
REBOL in the sheep's clothing of Perl.
Jingoism aside,
On 9/20/2000 at 1:40 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
REBOL was designed for non-programmers to write any scripts because
of its "natural" language. Hence, anybody with a good
brain can learn REBOL in a matter of days as compared to Perl or others
that would take weeks to learn. Any REBOL programmer
On 9/8/2000 at 8:03 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...but then, your message, arriving at my mailbox 12 seconds after the
one you copied the X-SELMA number from has the field
X-SELMA: [REBOL] 342011
in the header..
I did not get those 84 messages in between..
Selma routinely skips numbers, as I
The better enterprise portals, like those described at REBOL.COM, synch
with the PalmOS. It's difficult to imagine something like
Rebol/Express actually working in the marketplace without at least a
Palm conduit http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/tools/cdk/ .
If Rebol can't run as an interpreter
VERY much agree.
I would feel much more comfortable with building serious applications
in REBOL given a real MySQL API.
-Ted.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
I, and probably more people with me would consider talking directly to
MySQL from rebol as something rather important.
On 8/2/2000 at 12:55 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, where is the problem? I'm using MySQL (via ODBC) and it works
perfectly (at least for what I did test). Robert
I'll give it a try, seems like such a kludge though.
Problem is that I have the Command beta, but I missed the link to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]!
so where's a link to MySQL and PostGresSQL socket connectivity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, if you write a MySQL protocol handler, I could find a good use
for it... :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be great to connect rebol to MySql, but then I don't know if
MySql runs on as many
I've been meaning to ask about this myself. I think there's a script on
REBOL.ORG that mentions "REBOL Server Pages".
Meanwhile, I've been working with mSQL on a project. They have a CGI
that you can call like this:
/cgi-bin/w3-msql/path-to-your-webpage.html
This leverages the protocol where
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could Someone Make A Webserver with ASP and Embedded REBOL???0
ASP, by default, is really just embedded Virtual Basic.
Give REBOL a way to connect to a decent database (Elan's DBMS?), and
you could do anything that ASP or JSP can do.
Visit www.serverpages.com for
A CGI script is a script that is run by the Web server, in response to
a request from a Web page - either from a form or from a hyperlink.
When the server runs the script, it sends a bunch of environment
variables to the script via standard input. It also directs anything
the scripts sends back
Ooops .. should have been
When the server runs the script, it sets a bunch of environment
variables, and can also send user variables to the script via standard
input.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 7/26/2000 at 2:10 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A CGI script is a script that is
)Will they also allow executable cgi programs compiled for Linux?
This would be the definition of "Reb-Friendly", I think.
Any host that gives you your own CGI-BIN can use REBOL.
Ask or otherwise determine what OS is running, upload REBOL to your
CGI-BIN, and you're set to go.
Another good
On 7/21/2000 at 4:22 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, there's presently nothing like that other than searching the
mailing list archives for a description of your bug or asking Bo at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally, I've always felt that this is a strategic error.
I think the fact that REBOL.COM
I wouldn't think the projects are mutually exclusive. Writing a
light-weight browser in a new language is an important proof these
days. It would also mean the development of many components that could
be re-used in other projects, where controlling a system's default
browsers wouldn't work.
print "/bodyhtml"
This should be /html - but that would not have caused the error you
reported.
Here's a generic email script that I've been using. The form uses the
same variable names you see here (TO, FROM, SUBJECT). Note that you can
add variables in the form, and REBOL will automatically
Try running a very simple test script, like this one:
--
#!/home/httpd/cgi-bin/rebol --cgi
REBOL[]
print {Content-Type: text/plain
hello world!
}
query: make object! decode-cgi-query either
system/options/cgi/request-method = "GET"
[system/options/cgi/query-string] [make string! input]
probe
One worthy project is to enhance REBOL.ORG - if anyone is interested
the project page is at
http://husted.com/rebol-dev/org/
A related project might the development of a super-Wiki or "sparrow" in
REBOL. There are some notes on that at
http://husted.com/rebol-dev/
Toward this end, Bob Racko
Has anyone been able to use POST.r with any recent release of REBOL. I
can't get it work either. Even after pulling out the variables, and
hardcoding the paths, nothing is saved. Has 'parse changed much since
September?
I don't think Andrew is following the list anymore.
-Ted.
On 2/6/2000 at 4:17 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
how can I modify it so that it gives the form a particular name, so
that -that form can be otherwise handled?
}
Not sure what you mean by otherwise handled.
When you create a HTML page dynamically with PRINT, the name of the
script shows as the
On 1/30/2000 at 10:42 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
Hi, I'm having trouble using REBOL for CGI scripts. What do I have to
do?
Also, how do I find out which version of Libc I'm running for Linux?
Thanks.
}
CGI scripts can be hard because there's not a lot of feedback. Here's
some basics, most of
Andrew --
What did you do?
I tried to follow the instructions, and have been told I'm already on
the list. Petr was told he wasn't?
-T.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/29/2000 at 4:00 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dice: [3 D 6]
== [3 D 6]
print parse Dice [set N integer! 'D
Me too. And since I haven't opened VIEW yet, there's been no dancing
here. There's a glitch somewhere in the Notice list.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/29/2000 at 11:52 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe all the dancing produced enough vibration to keep jiggling the
"send" key?
I've found I can't use 'SEND from REBOL anymore. My setup refers to a
local machine that is the proxy/mail server. This used to work, but now
I'm told
** Script Error: pick expected series argument of type: series money
date time object port tuple any-function.
** Where: pick server-said 4
If
This is dangerous if you're running scripts that other people gave
you.
Good point. One idea would be to use a different extension for "safe
scripts", like .RS
One extension is as good as another to REBOL.
-Ted.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/28/2000 at 1:14 AM [EMAIL
I did actually try that myself. It came out to a 850k PDF, 300 pages.
If anyone is intereted, see http://husted.com/rebol-dev/users.pdf
I haven't tried it myself, but if I were going to print it, I'd invest
in a ream of pre-punched paper and a large binder first.
-Ted.
*** REPLY
I need to add mailing list management to a Web site. While there are
many Some-Other-Language scripts out there, I'd rather REBOL.
Right now, the main requirements are announce-only and multiple lists
with maybe one shared POP account. Of course later someone will want a
moderated or discussion
On 1/26/2000 at 8:12 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
I think that rebol would quickly become as popular as javascript if the
average person could understand the user.html.
}
Jack Sealy just started a list for REBOL newbies, and posted the first
part of a "square-one" tutorial. You might want to
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/25/2000 at 8:49 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in X-SELMA: [REBOL]
89336:
{
Yes, there are two aproaches available.
1) Do it all with REBOL
- use ports
- wait for /Command, let's bring some open source C/C++ library
onboard, build
something - probably
Borland's Database Engine is popular with several legal products, like
WestMate and Timeslips.
http://www.borland.com/bde/engine3x.html
It's a back end that hooks up with any development environment that can
call a DLL, which should include REBOL someday, I guess. The usual idea
is to write
On 1/24/2000 at 3:08 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
My thought is to wait until Rebol has some database capability if I
possibly can.
}
Well, there might be a difference between "capability" and
"connectivity".
The official November 9 product announcement
(http://www.rebol.com/news9B09.html)
N has to be a number taken from the Internet header of a previous
message, for example
get msg 86382
Another way to view a prior message is
http://rebol.org/userlist/archive/86/382.html
-Ted.
On 1/23/2000 at 2:04 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
But then, if you're getting the number from the header, don't you
already
have a copy of the mail? If you don't have a copy of the mail you
want,
how do you know which number to ask for?
}
It's a convient way to refer to a prior message without
On 1/19/2000 at 12:06 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
Finally, some of the questions will have been answered before. It is
fine refer me/readers to a particular
message already on the list that has both question and answer using the
{X-SELMA: [REBOL] dd} number.
}
Just a usage hint here, if
If the box isn't check, it doesn't set the value in the CGI value.
Checked
MAIL=ON
Not checked
It just don't exist.
Testing whether a path to an object variable exists is tricky, but here
goes
{
query: make object! decode-cgi-query system/options/cgi/query-string
either error? try
The HTTPD 1.1 spec is at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt and others are linked from
http://WWW.W3.ORG/Protocols/Specs.html
In general, we're suppose to use GET for small amounts of read-only
data that won't affect content on the server, and POST for writing new
pages, updating databases,
I think a real problem is that /COMMAND has put the community into Fear
Uncertainty and Doubt
mode. Because /COMMAND is coming no one wants to work on /COMMAND, but
/COMMAND never comes.
The Web site says:
{
REBOL/Command will be released soon. It is for commercial users who
require additional
On 1/19/2000 at 1:31 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
MySQL is a rather popular online dbms (right Randy?). MySQL supports
sockets. (Perhaps other commercial dbms's also support ports
connectivity. Does anyone know?) In addition to ODBC support, isn't it
time to implement an OpenSource ports-based
Thanks for your reply, Jim. Much appreciated.
On 1/20/2000 at 3:37 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
What was said was that there would be two levels of access to VIEW
functionality. One would be a high level dialect for quickly and easily
generating composited graphical interfaces. Second would be
On 1/2/2000 at 5:02 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
"When" you ask? I've got the first draft design complete, and Jim has
written the C-based graphical layering system. Over the
last week I've added the parse block capability necessary to make
dialects easier to write, and the first GUI dialect
I'm forwarding JB a copy of Carl's 2/Jan letter off list. Anyone else
who wants a copy can mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/18/2000 at 4:47 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A braindead "meta" sort of question. I bowed out of the Rebol
discussion list,
so
On 1/19/2000 at 1:01 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
It's just:
read %/computer/c/whatever/file.txt
The algorithm for WinXX systems assumes that if the root is more than
one
character it is a network connection. So, don't label your drives with
single letters! :-) Hope this helps.
- jim
}
Just
I have been getting requests for this, and so also made it availabe by
autoresponder from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/19/2000 at 7:53 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm forwarding JB a copy of Carl's 2/Jan letter off list. Anyone else
who wants a copy can mail
On 1/19/2000 at 11:08 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
what makes you think so?
}
Well, Elan, the brutal truth is that /Command was suppose to be out in
like November, and the mid-January window for /View is closing rapidly.
I'm concerned that the REBOL Tech product announcements are losing
Elan, you're a loyal defender of the faith, and I respect that.
I agree that /View is a good thing.
Carl announced the beta would be available in mid-January. I think we
should do everything we can to hold him to this. If /View is good
enough to put all the RT programmers on the project, then
Besides Andrew's fine example, if it heldps, here is my very nearly
trivial mailing list script.
The message to send and email list are kept as separate files.
{
REBOL[ Title: "A Mailing List" ]
; - Load mailing list
alist: make block! load %alist.txt
; - Setup Header
aheader: make
Functions vs Blocks
REBOL blocks look a lot like functions in other languages, but they are
very different. If you just DO a block, REBOL returns the last item in
the block, it does not assume that it is a sub-script to be evaluated.
If you would like to create a custom block for use as an email
It's the same on every platform. On Win, the drive letters become
single letter volumes. Backslashes are not valid. Use slashes.
test: read %/d/whatever/file.txt
HTH
-Ted.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/19/2000 at 7:51 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Win32, what's the syntax
On 1/18/2000 at 4:00 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We apologize for the delay and hope the benefits of REBOL/View will
more than offset the demand for the Palm and Psion.
So is the beta about to ship then? Mid-January quickly wanes.
-Ted.
The "Quick Reference Dictionary" is actually a Wiki. You can add your
own comments to the bottom of the page, and (shhh!) also add new pages
by putting in an URL like
http://rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/wiki.r?wiki=[NEW PAGE NAME]
When you go into edit mode, there is also a help button with
selma-source
needs to be the subject.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On ðºS at 7:24 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
selma-source
{
I'm currently running gVim (version 5.5) on my wintel boxes, and it
does a decent job of comprimising between the keyboard-oriented
heritage of vi and the GUI-oriented nature of most windows-oriented
applications.
}
Cool tip, Joel. I found that there's a version 5.6a for Win32 out at
I working on porting a small auction script I did last year in perl to
REBOL. (Along with everything else!) Of course, the completed product
will be posted to the library.
One glitch is a sub-script I borrowed from elsewhere that validates the
format of credit card numbers. I don't actually
On 1/11/2000 at 3:56 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
If someone sends me a description/specs of 1., I can certainly respond
with some ideas or - more likely - alpha quality scripts.
}
Elan,
Here are some design notes about my "Kabob" project, which Bob Racko
has pointed is much like the various
On 1/11/2000 at 4:09 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
So, the other mailing list is being set up right now. I've
subscribed those who have expressed an interest.
}
Jeff,
Cool, when can we expect the first posting?
Are we going to be able to run the lists from REBOL.ORG rather than
.COM?
It
Lastly, you're not running through any sort of proxy, ip masquerading,
or anything like that are you?
What if someone were?
I have a situtation where I need to FTP from behind a Microsoft Proxy
server (at a client loction).
FTP clients with "passive mode" options work just fine, but the
It's not a conspiracy, Cheryl.
REBOL has been moving target, and some people are just concerned that
taking old messages out of context will only confuse people.
One good solution would be to start a digest, and to archive the
digests by date and current REBOL version. Search parameters could
On 1/10/2000 at 10:29 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
Ths Web site is defined as a user-supported, non-official Web site.
}
I think everybody's right here.
REBOL.ORG was meant to be a user-supported non-official site, but until
yesterday Jeff hadn't found any users to manage it.
Elan might
There's a project I have in mind that might help with this.
Basically, I want to have something like dmoz.org hooked up to
hypertext documents, rather than just links, with the same group
editing features for documents that dmoz provides for just links.
The working specification is at
On 1/11/2000 at 12:57 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
So we've longed for someone to leap up from the community: a scripter
extraordinaire who wanted to own the site, take pride in it, help it to
prosper and grow.
}
This might be a bit much to put on one person's door-step.
Why not post some
On 1/11/2000 at 12:02 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
(Dare I ask for people to "me-to" on this on the mailing list??) ;-)
}
You wouldn't if I were the moderator ;-)
But, since I'm not, me-too.
{
One other important ground rule is that everything has got
to be done with REBOL. No
On 1/11/2000 at 3:59 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
Would this apply to bobr's project at sourceforge.net, too.
}
Which project is that, anyway?
-Ted.
On 1/11/2000 at 3:54 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
You guys have nothing to be ashamed of. Your efforts are much
appreciated
and are to be highly commended. I still don't understand why you need
two
different web sites. Why can't the user community and REBOL Tech work
as
one, and have one
On 1/11/2000 at 1:17 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
Me! Me! Me! Me!
I'll just use my REBOL HTML dialect and R2HTML.
}
Not exactly "subtle", Andrew :-)
Did you write your pages at
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
with the dialect?
-Ted.
On 1/11/2000 at 3:43 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
CONS:
Spam, spam, spam, and spam.
}
And NIR.
(Not In REBOL :-)
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/11/2000 at 3:43 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
REBOL has been moving target, and some people are just
The KABOB project is something I would like to manage as open source,
and had been thinking of setting up at sourceforge soon. Bobr replied
to my post and alluded to another package that met the same
requirements, which I've been trying to track down. He also mentioned
it in another post last
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
