On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 02:59 AM, Greg McCarroll wrote:
i seem to remember something about spike looking better with out his
bleached hair look according to MG
Practically everybody looks better without bleached hair.
Also Oz might be the outsider here.
Hm. There's something about
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
And there was me thinking that Chris was going to say that he doesn't have
a TV either. But he didn't. I don't have a TV. But I'm currently camped out
in my parents house, and they have 2. But I learn that they will both be
I got this from someone called Raphael Mankin
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but I don't really know how he fits into
the picture :(
Perl progger required to work in Golders Green. Permanent/contract as you
will.
Tasks:
1. To nursemaid a new, Mason based, web app through its initial period
2. To maintain
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
At 17:08 18/04/2001, jo walsh wrote:
this all gives me a creeping sense of deja type
yeah, i've just looked and realised it says almost exactly the same thing
on the website, except in more detail:
http://london.pm.org/WhatDo.shtml
Did _I_ do
I know you're all probably bored with this, but I was even more bored and
checked out the site further
(Although "Chris"'s website http://storedscripts.virtualave.net/ is quite,
um, entertaining ...)
It seems Burak Kanber (bk?) is Chris's best friend.
Not bad for a 13 year old though,
Robin Szemeti wrote:
in the *nix variant can you load stuff from CPAN straight in ?
Lemme check... yep, you can. (Using the Solaris version of ActivePerl 618.)
I used a non-XS module, but I believe I've done it with XS modules as well.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:17:22AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Rate ca. ?22k or equivalent for contract
Is that really the going rate for Perl proggers in London? Doesn't seem
like much (for reasonable definitions of "progger" :-).
Paul
From: "Dominic Mitchell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
And there was me thinking that Chris was going to say that he doesn't
have
a TV either. But he didn't. I don't have a TV. But I'm currently camped
out
in my parents house, and they
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
Hmm. I too am pissed off about this digital stuff, as the quality is worse
than analogue TV. My measure of quality is uninterrupted viewing. I have yet
to watch any digital TV where at some point the picture didn't pixelate or
completely blank for a
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
Well, one of them has finally snapped and is currently having a real go at
me. If you want to take a look, read the thread that starts at:
http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?read=4453
"And I can program better than
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 18/04/2001 at 16:36 +0100, Dean wrote:
Does OS X come with GNU tools like GCC and make then?
Yes, but they're not installed by default. (I can't remember if the
'BSD subsystem' is installed by default either though.) It comes on a
seperate CD within
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:29:03AM +0100, Jon Galliers wrote:
I know you're all probably bored with this, but I was even more bored and
checked out the site further
(Although "Chris"'s website http://storedscripts.virtualave.net/ is quite,
um, entertaining ...)
Not bad for a 13 year
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:02:03AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
Emacs has been able to do this for probably 10 years or more. I think
even vim can do it now, too.
Never noticed that! I
From: David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:58 AM
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:29:03AM +0100, Jon Galliers wrote:
I know you're all probably bored with this, but I was even more bored
and
checked out the site further
(Although "Chris"'s website
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:56:51AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You also get ProjectBuilder IDE.
http://developer.apple.com/tools/projectbuilder/
Which is very nice. Or at least it was, back when it was NeXTSTEP.
I had a little play with it last
Dave Cantrell wrote:
Hmmm ... if 'not working at all' is the same as 'not bad'. All I
get is the title image.
Got to love badly formed HTML (probably a missing /table tag or two). ...
And I thought he was an "master". ... Oops, sorry, that was only in "PERL",
not HTML.
(... Mind you, it all
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:02:03AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Then you're missing half the fun. Seriously. M-x compile was the
reason I started using emacs in the first place.
And I \N{WHITE HEART SUIT} M-x gdb
--
I respect faith, but doubt is what gives you an education.
--
From: Ian Brayshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:19 AM
Dave Cantrell wrote:
Hmmm ... if 'not working at all' is the same as 'not bad'. All I
get is the title image.
Got to love badly formed HTML (probably a missing /table tag or two).
...
And I thought he was an
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:26:52AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
"And I can program better than you any day of the week. Bring it on if
you want a challange. I will totally blow you and any supporter away
in a programming match."
I think I should take him up on it - who said life was
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember the Liz Castro BBS that I was talking about a few weeks ago.
Simon mentioned that a couple of the natives were getting restless and
seemed uncomfortable with me being there.
Well, one of them has finally snapped and is currently having a real
* Robert Shiels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hmm. I too am pissed off about this digital stuff, as the quality is worse
than analogue TV. My measure of quality is uninterrupted viewing. I have yet
to watch any digital TV where at some point the picture didn't pixelate or
completely blank for
From: Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:34 AM
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember the Liz Castro BBS that I was talking about a few weeks ago.
Simon mentioned that a couple of the natives were getting restless and
seemed uncomfortable with me
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Byng-Maddick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I don't mind funding the beeb, as long as the quality of
content they produce is high. I do object to funding random corporations
whose interests are to their shareholders...
Sorry, I don't mind funding
This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank.
Note: It's MSB, so normal caveats apply.
Dave...
=
Dave,
The following is a full spec, Please distribute as widely as possible as I
am very keen to find the right candidate.
Spec :
Opportunity has
I'm glad to say I am now employed *cheer*.
Was a rather nice birthday present to get today.
Anyway, probably see you folks tonight.
Leo
* Robert Shiels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: "Greg McCarroll" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But if you get a digital TV/receiver, surely BBC is available for free
without any subscriptions. If this is not the case then I think it's
criminal.
it is
I can read that two ways, do you
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:33:53AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?read=4453
Shame your solution ignored the locking problem...
Ha ha, we both just posted simultaneously -- I think between our
posts we should have *that* problem sorted.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:01:10PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
I'm glad to say I am now employed *cheer*.
Was a rather nice birthday present to get today.
"Congratulations" x 2!
Leo
Funny name for an Aries :-) Oh well, fire sign all the same.
Paul, 10th Apr.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:06:02PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
hard to say [BBC channels] are normally given free if you subscribe to one
premier channel
If your telly has a built-in digital decoder, then the BBC channels will
be free, and you won't need cable or a satellite dish.
IANABBCE
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank.
Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs?
i've been inadvertently hacking on a web-based forum for this stuff for a
little while... will talk about it a bit
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:05 PM
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank.
Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs?
We're creating a london.pm jobs database. Jo
On 19/04/2001 at 13:04 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank.
Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs?
There's a fairly long standing and, from what I remember, well
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
There's a fairly long standing and, from what I remember, well
respected habit of using JOB in the subject line- if it really annoys
you, filtering on that should reduce the jobness of the list quite a
lot.
Ah, bingo. Thanks.
Of
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:56:51AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You also get ProjectBuilder IDE.
http://developer.apple.com/tools/projectbuilder/
Which is very nice. Or at least it was, back when it
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:02:03AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Then you're missing half the fun. Seriously. M-x compile was the
reason I started using emacs in the first place.
And I \N{WHITE HEART SUIT} M-x gdb
Oh, yes, baby. And M-x ediff and
dcross - David Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:34 AM
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember the Liz Castro BBS that I was talking about a few weeks ago.
Simon mentioned that a couple of the natives were
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:33:59PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:06:02PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
hard to say [BBC channels] are normally given free if you subscribe to one
premier channel
If your telly has a built-in digital decoder, then the BBC channels
It's just occured to me that today is the day that I have to move all my
belongings out of my desk and back home. That's about half a bookshelf, a
complete change of clothes and a bottle of tequila (and that's just my
bottom draw).
This is incompatible with travelling to State51 tonight :-(
Any
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:03:33PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Obviously, from the bottom line this is a bit of a no-brainer. But this
leaves us having to copy files over to a PC, unencrypt them, and copy them
back to the Unix machine. Which I'd like to avoid.
Wouldn't be so bad if
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, you wrote:
PGP isn't free for commerical use. You're supposed to buy a license. When
our purchasing department here approached NAI to buy one, they were told the
the Unix (server) version was £27,000 and the Windows version was £657.
Obviously, from the bottom line this
From: Rob Partington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:22 PM
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:03:33PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Obviously, from the bottom line this is a bit of a no-brainer. But this
leaves us having to copy files over to a PC, unencrypt them, and copy
From: Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:10 AM
It's just occured to me that today is the day that I have to move all my
belongings out of my desk and back home. That's about half a bookshelf, a
complete change of clothes and a bottle of tequila (and that's
Noticed on my way past the news stands last night that the next tube
strike is pencilled in for May the 3rd, as is the next social
meeting. OK, so the strike might not happen but if it does is this
not going to make the next social meeting a bit problematic?
just a thought.
Struan
Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Noticed on my way past the news stands last night that the next tube
strike is pencilled in for May the 3rd, as is the next social
meeting. OK, so the strike might not happen but if it does is this
not going to make the next social meeting a bit
dcross - David Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PGP isn't free for commerical use. You're supposed to buy a license.
When our purchasing department here approached NAI to buy one, they
were told the the Unix (server) version was 27,000 and the Windows
version was 657.
Stick it on a Win2K
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:48:04PM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Noticed on my way past the news stands last night that the next tube
strike is pencilled in for May the 3rd, as is the next social
meeting. OK, so the strike might not happen but if it
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, you wrote:
Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't be suprised if by then the abolishment of the licence fee hasn't been
announced and that the BBC hasn't announced subscription charges for it's
services. Better that than the Beeb starts carrying ads.
* at 19/04 15:04 +0100 dcross - David Cross said:
From: Steve Mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:48 PM
Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Noticed on my way past the news stands last night that the next tube
strike is pencilled in for May the 3rd, as is
That sounds like a great idea. Now, all we need in someone to
organise it.
Did you say you weren't busy for the next couple of weeks :)
[apologies if this message gets sent twice, there's summat funny going on]
If the powers that be give my penderel account the necessary privs to alter
the
Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it likely that the licence fee will go. It would be a popular
move with the Great Unwashed. ( who seem happy to spend 400 quid a year
on a Sky subscription ), so I can see the BBC being released from its
licence fee. This would have huge
looking forward to the meeting...
just thought i'd mention that although last time i said there wouldn't be
beer and there was, this time there really won't be beer... no time to
organise it i'm afraid.
but please feel free to bring your own :)
cheers
alex
--
here they come lalalalala
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, jo walsh wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank.
Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs?
i've been inadvertently hacking on a web-based forum for this stuff for
How can you inadvertently hack ?
"I'll just quickly knock a little something together to do task X ... hmmm,
actually, wouldn't it be cool if it could also do task Y, just for
convenience sake ... hmm, that works, but I'm sure it could work
stronger/faster/better than before ... "
And so on
dcross - David Cross wrote:
Hah! If I can't get them to use GPG, I have _no_ chance with
Samba.
Why? Because it's open software (or whatever they call themselves)?
Can't you call it an "Enterprise cross-platform file sharing solution" or
something like that? And get a company to support it?
i've been inadvertently hacking on a web-based forum for this stuff for a
little while...
How can you inadvertently hack ?
at a scattiness load as consistently high as mine has been lately, it's
hard to do many things advertently
consider yourself warned :)
z
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:12:57PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
Can't you call it an "Enterprise cross-platform file sharing solution" or
something like that?
So is Napster.
--
DEC diagnostics would run on a dead whale.
-- Mel Ferentz
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
This is the thirteenth of hopefully many weekly summaries of the London
Perl Mongers mailing list. For the week starting 2001-04-16:
Greg McCarroll asked about online brokers, Robert and
:)
Tony
Simon Wistow wrote:
This is the thirteenth of hopefully many weekly summaries of the London
*cough*
Frscking, sucking, send shortcuts in netscape.
Apologies.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Marcel Grunauer wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 03:37 PM, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Hmmm... You're assuming that Perl Mongers use public transport. I
thought we
all swanned about in taxis and limos.
I recommend public camels. Maybe now would be the time for a
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:40:02PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote:
Camels are quite hard to see at London Zoo at the moment, owing to the
foot 'n mouth situation. I was there a couple of weeks back, and the
heffalump house was shut. The penguins ain't bad, though.
Last time I saw penguins at a zoo,
On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 05:40 PM, Mike Wyer wrote:
I recommend public camels. Maybe now would be the time for a trip to
the
zoo.
Camels are quite hard to see at London Zoo at the moment, owing to the
foot 'n mouth situation. I was there a couple of weeks back, and the
From: Mike Wyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 4:40 PM
Camels are quite hard to see at London Zoo at the moment, owing to the
foot 'n mouth situation. I was there a couple of weeks back, and the
heffalump house was shut. The penguins ain't bad, though.
Ooh. Thanks. I think
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
Simon Wistow wrote:
This is the thirteenth of hopefully many weekly summaries of the London
^^
*cough*
Frscking, sucking, send shortcuts in netscape.
Apologies.
I guess it was inevitable really
/J\
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:40:02PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote:
Camels are quite hard to see at London Zoo at the moment, owing to the
foot 'n mouth situation. I was there a couple of weeks back, and the
heffalump house was shut. The penguins ain't bad,
Bull have a web site with ready compiled samba binaries for AIX - just say
it comes from an AIX manufacturer...
-Original Message-
From: dcross - David Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 April 2001 14:27
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (Don't Laugh) Buying PGP
From: Rob
That sounds like a great idea. Now, all we need in someone to
organise it.
Did you say you weren't busy for the next couple of weeks :)
If the powers that be give my penderel account the necessary privs to alter
the site then I will organise.
Note that this email will expire tomorrow and
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
This is the thirteenth of hopefully many weekly summaries of the London
Perl Mongers mailing list. For the week starting 2001-04-16:
Greg McCarroll asked about online brokers, Robert and
*GUNSHOT*
*queue eastenders theme track* ( or dallas if you
From: "Steve Mynott" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why don't you have the social meeting a day earlier so that everyone
can "work from home" with their hangovers the following day?
That would work for me. I might be able to get down to London more often.
Being in charge of baby while missus goes off
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
This is the thirteenth of hopefully many weekly summaries of the London
Perl Mongers mailing list. For the week starting 2001-04-16:
Greg McCarroll asked about online brokers, Robert and
*GUNSHOT*
What time is the technical meeting starting tonight ?
Simon.
At 17:37 19/04/2001 +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:38 PM
What time is the technical meeting starting tonight ?
oh. um. well. let's say 7:00pm. how does that sound?
Good. Almost got stuck here but have finally tracked
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote:
The okapi was much better (think giraffe crossed with zebra with a
tongue any muff diver would kill for)
Do they have bonobo? I thought bonobo were the generic sexual zoo inhabitant.
--
"MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight --
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote:
The okapi was much better (think giraffe crossed with zebra with a
tongue any muff diver would kill for)
Do they have bonobo? I thought bonobo were the generic sexual zoo inhabitant.
Nope. All
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Make them start producing Doctor Who again, while you're at it...
If they do start doing Doctor Who again it will have a finite lifespan,
is he not near the maximum number or lives a timelord can regenerate?
--
Greg McCarroll
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:31:59PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Make them start producing Doctor Who again, while you're at it...
If they do start doing Doctor Who again it will have a finite lifespan,
is he not near the maximum number or
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:03:20 +0100 (BST), Mike Wyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nope. All very respectable, sadly. No bonobos at all, and all the other
apes and monkeys were very well behaved.
Last time I went, the prarie dogs had gone. I was not amused.
c.
--
every day, computers are
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:34:02AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Byng-Maddick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I don't mind funding the beeb, as long as the quality of
content they produce is high. I do object to funding random corporations
whose
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:26:54PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Hah! If I can't get them to use GPG, I have _no_ chance with Samba. The Unix
box in question is running AIX.
*Cough* several IBM people I've spoken to believe that IBM's
FastConnect(tm) "PC integration software for AIX" or
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Rate ca. 22k or equivalent for contract
Borrocks
/J\
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Marcel Grunauer wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 02:59 AM, Greg McCarroll wrote:
i seem to remember something about spike looking better with out his
bleached hair look according to MG
Practically everybody looks better without bleached hair.
I had bleached
On 19 Apr 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Wednesday, April 18, 2001, 5:37:22 PM, David H. Adler wrote:
Mike Jarvis wrote:
CNN reports that BtVS's SMG will wed Freddie Prinz.
DHA Clarification:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:43:09PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
From: Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 4:30 PM
CNN reports that BtVS's SMG will wed Freddie
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:26:54PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
Hah! If I can't get them to use GPG, I have _no_ chance with Samba. The Unix
box in question is running AIX.
*Cough* several IBM people I've spoken to believe that IBM's
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Works with Objective C too. Which is still (for my money) the best way
of messing with the NeXTSTEP object model.
s/best/only/
Paul
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, you wrote:
I had bleached hair once and I looked gorgeous - mind I had pink hair once
as well ... :)
another twenty years matey and you'll be posting :
" i had hair once ... " :))
--
Robin Szemeti
The box said "requires windows 95 or better"
So I installed Linux!
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:38 PM
What time is the technical meeting starting tonight ?
oh. um. well. let's say 7:00pm. how does that sound?
--
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the
I'm leaving now, chances are I'll be there 7.30-8 ish
see ya!
--
Robert
- Original Message -
From: dcross - David Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2001 17:37
Subject: RE: What time tonight ?
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April
87 matches
Mail list logo
