Re: [LTP] Introdocing autoconf to signalfd test case

Hi Yamato, On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:08 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: And another thing to point out. Shouldn´t: make clean be removing stuff like configure, config.status, config.log, autom4te.cache from the sources. It is retaining them. Is it expected ? I would like them to

Re: [LTP] Introdocing autoconf to signalfd test case

However, i wanted: make clean to do all that stuff. So, updated accordingly. I guess this will make people familiar with autoconf confusing. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge

Re: [LTP] [patch] runpidns.patch for adding new tests pidns05.sh and pidns06.sh

Subrata Modak wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 10:53 +0530, Veerendra wrote: hi Please accept the patch for running the pidns tests for the containers. Also modified, to run all the testcases even when other testcase's fails. Did you forget to attach the

Re: [LTP] [patch] runpidns.patch for adding new tests pidns05.sh and pidns06.sh

Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Subrata Modak wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 10:53 +0530, Veerendra wrote: hi Please accept the patch for running the pidns tests for the containers. Also modified, to run all the testcases even when other testcase's fails.

[LTP] securebits testcases

Some time ago, someone (probably Subrata :) asked whether there were any testcases for the securebits functionality. Nope, I haven't yet had time to write them :) What I did do in the last few minutes was write up what I think should be tested. There is some chance I'll have time to write these

[LTP] [PATCH] SO_REUSEADDR in SCTP tests?

Hello, I've noticed a bunch of errors in the SCTP tests, all of them being for the same reason, bind: address already in use. I tried using the SO_REUSEADDR option on the socket, as if it was TCP, and it helped. However, I know almost nothing about SCTP, and don't know whether the same

[LTP] [PATCH] pipeio - number of writes overflow

Hello, the computation of the number of writes in pipeio can overflow, eg. if you want to run more than 4 GB through the pipe. The attached patch fixes that. Regards Jiri Palecek -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ binKrD0LtbSZM.bin Description:

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] SO_REUSEADDR in SCTP tests?

Hi, On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 00:35 +0100, Jiří Paleček wrote: Hello, I've noticed a bunch of errors in the SCTP tests, all of them being for the same reason, bind: address already in use. I tried using the SO_REUSEADDR option on the socket, as if it was TCP, and it helped. However, I

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] pipeio - number of writes overflow

On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 00:41 +0100, Jiří Paleček wrote: Hello, the computation of the number of writes in pipeio can overflow, eg. if you want to run more than 4 GB through the pipe. The attached patch fixes that. Thanks for this. Regards-- Subrata Regards Jiri Palecek --

[LTP] [TEST FAILURE] mallocstress testcase is failing on x86_64

Hi, Please find below some problem related to mallocstress testcase failing on x86_64. Let us know if some of you have encountered this. Rishi Reported: mallocstress testcase is failing on: Linux 2.6.27-rc6-7-default #1