Hi Ricardo,
removing the CC definition as in the patch at bottom (which near as I
can tell is yours :) is fine. Not sure whether it is there because I
was typing on autopilot, or I cut-and-pasted it from somewhere, but
it is in fact not needed. My tree compiles fine without it.
thanks,
-serge
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Rishikesh/Sergei,
Any fix available for the same ?? ;-)
Please try the following patch...
thanks,
-serge
diff -Nrup ltp/testcases/kernel/containers/Makefile
ltp-patched/testcases/kernel/containers/Makefile
---
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Rishikesh/Sergei,
Any fix available for the same ?? ;-)
Please try the following patch...
I'm sorry, that should handle archictures without
Quoting Rishikesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Rishikesh/Sergei,
Any fix available for the same ?? ;-)
Please try the following patch...
I'm sorry, that should handle archictures
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 11:15 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 11:31 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:55 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi All,
Today
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 09:32 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Ok. Stephen?? Patch has been Recalled and Jeff?? Applied for all the Fixes
he mentions. Thanks to you all for getting this Fixed
Quoting Nate Straz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 08:58:36AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Rishikesh K. Rajak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+ tst_resm(TINFO, PIDNS test is running inside container\n);
+ if(( cpid == CHILD_PID)
+ ( ppid == PARENT_PID
Quoting naveen penumala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
please check...
when im building the selinx-tests using make command i'm getting following
error
these are the files presented in selinux-testsuite.
/home/penuman/LTP/ltp-full-20071231/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite
# ls
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here is a patch to add some file capability tests to ltp.
Thanks. I am running this and will get back to you soon.
I am not able to execute this through:
./runltp -f filecaps,
On further investigation i found that filecapstest.sh is
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here is a patch to add some file capability tests to ltp.
Thanks. I am running this and will get back to you soon.
I am not able to execute this through:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 11:37 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 07:20 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:21 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Here
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 11:37 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 07:20 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:21 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Here
to add that one line.
thanks,
-serge
modifications need to be done, then please send me an updated one, diff
of present ltp cvs. Thanks
--Subrata
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 11:37 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 16:43 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Sergei,
I have merged Stephen?? Patches sent on 24/01/2008, which modifies:
ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/README
Hi Andrew,
The original verify_caps_exec.c test in the filecaps test was written
before libcap had file capabilities support. Faced with implementing
64-bit support in that ugly mess in order to properly test your
per-process securebits patch, it seemed wise to just switch to using
libcap :)
over the source code, have
noted a number of things. Please see my comments inline.
PS. What should I read to get up to speed on LTP?
Thanks
Andrew
Subrata Modak wrote:
| Andrew,
|
| Your thoughts on this ;-)
|
| --Subrata
|
| On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:53 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote
?
Jeff
--Subrata
Regards--
Subrata
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 07:20 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:21 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Here is a patch against this morning's ltp cvs snapshot to implement
Stephen's suggestion of setting expand-check=0 for the duration
Quoting Andrew G. Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Figure in the meantime I can at least send it out for some
| more comments from Andrew. Andrew, I'm also attaching the
| new verify_caps_exec.c verbatim for easier
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This patch, which is independent of Jeff's patch, updates the selinux
testsuite to run under Fedora 9, and does no harm on Fedora 8.
While creating this, I noticed two other things that ultimately need
fixing:
1) The sbin_deprecated.patch adds
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:07 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This patch, which is independent of Jeff's patch, updates the selinux
testsuite to run under Fedora 9, and does no harm on Fedora 8
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 4/2/08, Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:07 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This patch, which is independent
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Veerendra Chandrappa wrote:
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them with the LTP.
Of course it depends on the order of priority,
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Matt Helsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi All,
This patch adds a few tests for a variety of bind mounts. More than
just shared subtrees are involved as plain --bind and plain
Quoting Garrett Cooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi again,
Just wondering if there was a continued need for the NO_LTP flag /
targets in testcases/kernel/containers/*. I've figured out a way
around it to some extent, but I'd like to avoid duplication /
unnecessary logic if at all
]
Cc: Andrew G. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/sys.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/sys.c~sys_prctl-fix
Quoting Rishikesh K. Rajak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi All,
Some testcase of fs_bind are failing on my system.
I ran ltp-full-20080531 release on RHEL 4 .
#uname -a
Linux 2.6.9-72.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 3 16:32:03 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
#mount
/dev/sda4 on / type ext3
No changes per se, except that we do need an update to prevent the
current false negatives that I'm getting. As Andrew said, we need to
find a resilient way to compare two abstract bitsets. Andrew, do you
think it's a reasonable idea for libcap to add a capcmp() function,
which does a cap-by-cap
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi All,
I would like to meet all of you who is attending OLS 2008 summit at
Ottawa. I will be there to present our LTP Paper = Building a Robust
Linux Kernel Piggyback the Linux Test Project.
It would be really nice if i can meet some of you, so
It looks like unconfined_t is not granted setfcap capability. So
when running ltp as unconfined_t, the file capabilities test fails.
I'm just wondering what the right answer is:
1. require running ltp as an administrative type
2. give ltp a custom policy module to create an ltp_t
Here is a patch which makes the file capabilities tests work again
in Fedora 9.
I say DONOTAPPLY because it requires a new libcap feature which
currently exists only in the libcap git tree. Once that feature is in a
libcap release, I can tweak the Makefile to only run with the new
libcap, and
Please apply this patch (in place of, not on top of the earlier
version). It eliminates the potential for many false negatives.
thanks,
-serge
1. Use cap_compare to compare capability sets instead of
comparing the far less reliable text representations.
2. pI' tests were failing bc I started
Quoting Michael Kerrisk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Masatake YAMATO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From now on, I'll be agitating more to get man pages provided more with new
syscalls and ther kernel-userland interfaces. That will mean either I
twist
developers arms
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Veerendra wrote:
Signed-off-by: Veerendra C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch consists of the files..
containers/libclone/libclone.h
containers/libclone/libnetns.c
containers/libclone/Makefile
Regards
Veerendra C
Attaching the
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Veerendra wrote:
Signed-off-by: Veerendra C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch consists of the files..
containers/netns/child_propogate.sh
containers/netns/parent_share.sh
containers/netns/parent_view.sh
containers/netns/sysfsview.c
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Recent OLS 2008 was a critical point in LTP´s evolution, as i got the
opportunity to meet several people across the Linux ecosystem, and
listened to their opinion about LTP. Here i would start a mail chain
with the above Subject line, discuss
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Was just browsing through and found that this piece of code is not
built/installed by default. I did not find any issue to do so. So, just
added up to the Makefile(s). I am however investigating the best
possible way to run them.
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Subrata,
I am sending the updated patches for the network Namespacs .
This patches have addressed the review comments of Serge.
I have taken care to return error on failure from both the parent NS and
child Namespace .
Please let me know
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Rishi/Serge,
libclone.c is giving some unexpected build error(s) on the following
x86_64 machine. Can you please look in to the following:
1) Linux 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 28 03:38:47 EST 2006 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux,
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Serge/Andrew,
I am not sure whether our existing filecaps test cases at:
http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/filecaps/,
take care of testing this new feature (Per-process securebits) added in
2.6.26. If not, do you
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Serge,
I can see that CLONE_NEWIPC is being tested at various testing scenarios
of CONTAINERS specially inside the SYSVIPC Namespace category. Are you
also planning to add some patch(s) for testing:
1) Implement sys_unshare(CLONE_SYSVSEM),
2)
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This patch has 4 files..
check_netns_enabled.c - checks for the network ns is enabled
initialize.sh - Initializes the common functions and variables
Makefile - Makefile
runnetnstest.sh - Creates a batch file to run the tests.
Signed off by
Based on a cursory glance and memory of Matt's patches, this looks good.
Matt?
thanks,
-serge
Quoting Jin Bing Guo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
When I built and installed the latest LTP cases, some errors broke the
install process.
# make install
make[4]: Entering directory
I needed the following patch in order for file capabilities to correctly
install. If there is a better way to do this, that's fine with me, but
CC was undefined and this was the easiest way to get past this.
thanks,
-serge
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff -Nrup
Trivial patch to remove an unused local var.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff -Nrup
ltp-full-20080831/testcases/kernel/security/filecaps/verify_caps_exec.c
ltp-full-20080831.new/testcases/kernel/security/filecaps/verify_caps_exec.c
---
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 10:38 +0800, Jin Bing Guo wrote:
When the libcap-2.11 or newer didn't been installed on the sysytem,
the filecaps testcase
would return a message instead of an error.
'should'? (At first I thought you meant that is what it
', but
'umount /proc' is insufficient. More to the point, pidns03 wasn't
trying to clean up /proc at all. So make it use CLONE_NEWNS so
its private procfs will be automatically cleaned up.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
pidns03.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
Quoting CAI Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
--- Veerendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch addresses the comments if any, on the below files
child_propogate.sh - Propagates the contents of the child sysfs to
parentNS.
parent_share.sh - Creates a sharable volume of the sysfs for
Thanks, looks good to me.
-serge
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi
Attaching the patch for the testcase on PIDNS.
Assertion:
1. kill -9 1 from inside a container does not kill container
Steps:
a) create container
b) kill -9 1
c) Should not kill the containers
Test Result:
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:30 +0530, Veerendra wrote:
Hi ,
I noticed the OOM killer while running the hackbench tests in zSeries.
The machine had memory of 2GB and swap space of 1GB.
While running the 'hackbench 300' noticed this OOMs.
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+## Set this to 1 if libcaps-2.11 or newer is already installed in your
system
+## from
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/libcap2, as
well as,
+## the libattr is available in the system. The kernel should also have
been built
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 10:53 +0530, Veerendra wrote:
hi
Please accept the patch for running the pidns tests for the containers.
Also modified, to run all the testcases even when other testcase's fails.
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 10:53 +0530, Veerendra wrote:
hi
Please accept the patch for running the pidns tests for the
containers.
Also modified, to run all the testcases even when other testcase's fails.
Some time ago, someone (probably Subrata :) asked whether there
were any testcases for the securebits functionality.
Nope, I haven't yet had time to write them :) What I did do in
the last few minutes was write up what I think should be tested.
There is some chance I'll have time to write these
Quoting Veerendra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Signed-off-by: Veerendra C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heh, looks ok - I would have jsut used one exit value and only
set it if it wasn't already non-zero, but the array will work :)
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note I don't think declare works in dash,
Veerendra,
I'm going to assume you're working on a fix for this unless I hear
otherwise.
thanks,
-serge
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi Veerendra/Serge,
I found the following compilation error for NETNS library on the
following machine:
Linux 2.6.23.13 #1 SMP Wed Jan 9
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patchset creates the basic infrastructure for running the existing
network
testcases under containers automatically. The patchset creates a command file
named nw_under_ns for the purpose.
Please review them and provide all your valuable
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch fixes some of the errors that I found in network namespace creation
library.
A file test on an unset vriable will give a pass, so the current test fails.
(var scrpt may not have been set before calling :))This patch fixes that
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch adds the other namespace creation support with the network
namespace.
We now create the PID UTS namespaces and unshares filesystem attributes.
The patch is required to reuse the existing network testcases directly without
any
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch changes the way information is exchanged between parent and child.
This is required because of the following reason:
Earlier the child was in the same pid namespace as parent and this info was
passed from the child to the parent
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Do not let the errors happen silently. The patch adds some messages.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Index: ltp-full-20081130/testcases/kernel/containers/netns/childns.sh
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
The binary to create the network namespace and run the script tests.
The api takes two script names as arguments and run them in parent and
child namespace.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch adds the script to be executed in the parent container. The script
will
contain the code as per the requirements from different network testcases.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch adds the script to be executed in the child container. The script
contains the setup code and the command for different network testcases.
Further code will be added as per the requirements from different network
testcases.
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch adds the script to be called by the command file to run network
testcases under containers environment.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Index:
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch edits the Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Index: ltp-full-20081130/testcases/kernel/containers/netns/Makefile
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
This patch adds the command file for running network testcases under
containers.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Index: ltp-full-20081130/runtest/nw_under_ns
Quoting Sudhir Kumar (sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Add other network testcases to be run.
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Kumar sku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Index:
ltp-full-20081130/testcases/kernel/containers/netns/runallnetworktests_child.sh
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 19:50 -0200, Edjunior Barbosa Machado wrote:
checking sys/capability.c for pidns14 and pidns16
this patch adds sys/capability.c checking for pidns14 and
pidns16 testcases using autoconf support.
Quoting Mike Frysinger (vap...@gentoo.org):
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 03:27:51 Seiichi Ikarashi wrote:
Since ia64 glibc does not have the clone() function call,
building testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns12.c fails as follows.
this clone garbage is out of hand. we need to unify it
Quoting Seiichi Ikarashi (s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Mike Frysinger (vap...@gentoo.org):
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 03:27:51 Seiichi Ikarashi wrote:
Since ia64 glibc does not have the clone() function call,
building testcases/kernel/containers/pidns
Quoting Seiichi Ikarashi (s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com):
Mike Frysinger さんは書きました:
On Thursday 15 January 2009 02:17:27 Seiichi Ikarashi wrote:
+#ifdef __ia64__
+ ret = clone2(fn1, childstack, getpagesize(), clone_flags, arg1,
NULL, NULL, NULL); +#else
+ ret = clone(fn1,
Quoting Veerendra (vee...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Hi
Submitting a new testcase on semaphore to test the IPCNS in the
containers. This patch contains the batch file to run the test on LTP.
In this patch , I am checking the IPCNS functionaity:
Semaphore in parent NS is isolated from the
Quoting Seiichi Ikarashi (s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Seiichi Ikarashi (s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com):
Like this?
Cool, thanks, and thanks for fixing up the do_clone_tests(). However,
you pass the bottom instead of the top of the stack to clone. See
Quoting CAI Qian (caiq...@cclom.cn):
Hi,
--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Subrata Modak subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This approach will skip the failures that those
entries return EINVAL
while SELinux is enable. You can check if SELinux is
enable or not, and
then add then to something
Quoting CAI Qian (caiq...@cclom.cn):
Kamalesh Babulal, well, my approach is that anyone who cares about
AppArmor can add a list of files should work to the code. it is fair that if
different LSMs behave differently, we'll need different lists
(selinux_should_work and apparmor_should_work) to
Quoting CAI Qian (caiq...@cclom.cn):
Hi,
--- On Wed, 1/28/09, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
From: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] proc01: SELinux with attr/* Interface - version 2
To: CAI Qian caiq...@cclom.cn
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal kamal
Quoting CAI Qian (caiq...@cclom.cn):
--- On Wed, 1/28/09, CAI Qian caiq...@cclom.cn wrote:
Here is the link for the email from Stephen Smalley that I was refer
to,
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/7324
The patch you sent doesn't do what he suggests though. He is saying
to ignore the
Quoting Kamalesh Babulal (kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Sorry send the wrong patch
Aaah.
1. SELinux on (attr/* read successfuly)
2. AppArmor on (???)
3. SELinux off and AppArmor off (attr/* read with -EINVAL)
4. TOMOYO on
5. Smack on
...
As the result, the above
Quoting Kamalesh Babulal (kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
selinux enabled
proc01 0 INFO : /proc/acpi/event: open: known issue: Device or
resource busy
proc01 0 INFO : /proc/sys/net/ipv6/route/flush: is write-only.
proc01 0 INFO :
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:51 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 08:42 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 21:32 +1100, James Morris wrote:
I'm trying to run the LTP SELinux tests using the
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:51 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 08:42 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 21:32 +1100, James Morris wrote:
I'm
Quoting Christopher J. PeBenito (peben...@ieee.org):
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:14 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:51 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 08:42 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote
Quoting Christopher J. PeBenito (peben...@ieee.org):
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:37 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:51 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01
Quoting CAI Qian (caiq...@cclom.cn):
Hi,
This patch is using configure script to automatically detect if the
system has libselinux libraries and header installed, so we can use a
macro later on to actually check if SELinux is enabled. Otherwise, or if
you don't want to run configure script
Quoting CAI Qian (caiq...@cclom.cn):
Hi,
The following patch adds checking for SELinux. If it is enabled, the
following entries are expected to be read successfully,
/proc/self/attr/*
/proc/self/task/[0-9]*/attr/*
If it is disabled, expecting read(2) return -1 with -EINVAL. It does not
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Serge,
Are you considering to submit something on this :-)
Not this month.
I'll think about it again in April (if noone else has stepped
in by then).
-serge
--
Quoting Casey Schaufler (ca...@schaufler-ca.com):
Subrata Modak wrote:
Please send a tarball of the tests to: ltp-list ltp-l...@lists.sf.net,
if you are subscribed to the mailing list. Else:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/ltp-list,
Also please see:
Quoting Matt Helsley (matth...@us.ibm.com):
* Sample usage:
$ mkdir /containers
$ mount -t cgroup -ofreezer freezer /containers
$ mkdir /containers/0
$ echo $some_pid /containers/0/tasks
$ cat /containers/0/tasks/freezer.state
THAWED
$ echo FROZEN
Sorry, clearly this set should be 1/4, etc
-serge
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies
Add the first test for posix message queue namespaces, plus a
test to detect whether they are enabled.
Note that the kernel version check is currently bogus - these are
are in -mm.
Based on older version by Nadia Derbey.
Changelog:
Mar 02 2009: moved to the libclone do_clone() helper.
Test that the interaction between mqueuefs and ipc namespaces
is correct (one mqueuefs for each ipc namespace, living at least
as long as the namespace)
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/containers/mqns/mqns.h |1 +
If the mqueuefs for a ipc namespace is mounted in a mounts namespace
which outlives the ipcns, then the view of the fs remains valid
until someone umounts it. Run some tests to make sure that all is
sane.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/containers/mqns/mqns.h
It's kind of redundant with test 01 since there is no hierarchical
relationship between ipc namespaces - they are all completely isolated.
But heck it can't hurt.
Signed-off-by: Nadia Derbey nadia.der...@bull.net
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
Hi Subrata,
here is the version with updated copyrights and a README update.
thanks,
-serge
From caaabd21861b57d6943367efe54f36f9b3700b8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nadia Derbey nadia.der...@bull.net
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:38:03 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ltp: posix message queue
From d94e82179644f02d3561da104a054f099bc72416 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nadia Derbey nadia.der...@bull.net
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:00:40 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ltp: posix mqns: test parent to child mq access
It's kind of redundant with test 01 since there is no hierarchical
From 3bf32de589f6f6a456dbe721729a0d7273dfb7c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:35:16 +
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ltp: posix mqns: test vfs and mq interaction
Test that the interaction between mqueuefs and ipc namespaces
is correct (one mqueuefs
From 270c6e79387f640f5a00254fa9d3353fc23addd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:53:20 +
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ltp: posix mqns: test that user mount of posixmq survives
the ipcns
If the mqueuefs for a ipc namespace is mounted in a mounts
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Serge,
Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do
not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be
there was some conversation.
I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet.
(Against the March intermediate release)
mqns support is expect in 2.6.30, not 2.6.29.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
.../kernel/containers/mqns/check_mqns_enabled.c|2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:19, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
(Against the March intermediate release)
mqns support is expect in 2.6.30, not 2.6.29.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
.../kernel/containers/mqns
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
