I do in a sense. I think the lute has *way* too small a pool of
performers and audience. To create a large professional class and
amateur base we have to do something different, we have to make big changes.
Had we started this 20 years ago, there would be 20 times more
professional players, and
Clarity above clutter is a common factor in many postings. Personal
preferences - grid rhythm signs versus minimal use of rhythm signs,
landscape versus portrait, where to place measure numbers - are not
interesting in itself, but if there are enough people sending in their
preferences some sort
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:19 AM
To: Lute Net
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines, impossible!
If you provide tablature in electronic format you completely loose control.
true. Who needs control
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 December 2008 20:16
To: List LUTELIST; howard posner
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
One feature in Finale that I find very useful is you can import a
MIDI
file and it will notate it
automatically
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008, David van Ooijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Clarity above clutter is a common factor in many postings.
agreed, clutter is bad for legibility.
Grids can be good, when the music has a regular pulse that is shown
clearly. Sparse flags can get me lost, the occaisional redundant
@Betsy Lahaussois:
Intel macs can run windows very well via Boot Camp or Parallels or
some other virtualisation tool.
If you use Boot Camp (free with OSX leopard) you will only need a
Legal copy of Windows XP with an integrated SP2 or later. Vista will
run fine as well.
How to do that is
I think everyone has their faves, just like the original copyists.
Here's a few themes:
1. Landscape vs portrait--
Both existed historically, some formats work better for some music.
But see below
2. Diplomatic facsimile--hints at, or strongly resembles the
original. A very good choice for many
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Lex van Sante wrote:
However you should note that one cannot run Windows on a PPC- Mac.
I do it all the time using Virtual PC. Not exactly a perfect option...
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
@ Howard Posner: Probably off topic: Sorry!
You mean you have actually been able to use Fronimo with Virtual PC?
That is no mean feat! I've tried using it but it was all very slow,
unstable, not to mention costly.
I was fortunate that my Apple dealer at the time offered me a chance
to test
list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
@ Howard Posner: Probably off topic: Sorry!
You mean you have actually been able to use Fronimo with Virtual PC?
That is no mean feat! I've tried using it but it was all very slow
On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Lex van Sante wrote:
You mean you have actually been able to use Fronimo with Virtual PC?
I've never tried to use Fronimo.
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Me too for the last 5(?) years and the only program I run on it is
Fronimo which works mostly fine. (ok, and Firefox to download the
newest Fronimo 3 from time to time ;^) My only slowdown is playing the
midi files. I have to save them as midi files, send them to the shared
folder and then
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008, howard posner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Lex van Sante wrote:
However you should note that one cannot run Windows on a PPC- Mac.
how about mac OS on a pentium with a partition for windoz?
Yes, it obliges purchase of pentium, which i supose was
Am 9 Dec 2008 um 14:47 hat David Tayler geschrieben:
7. All editions should be free. We need more lute players. Thanks to
all who make the music available.
Yes, and all lessons likewise. And all the concerts, we need more listeners,
you see. After all
the applause is the bread of the
David,
I agree with your preferences, especially about the diapassons.
FWIW, here are some personal guidelines that have crystalized through the
years, and this in relation to tablatures only, I'm not talking about grand
staff or notation:
Landscape view, to make the score easily readable
Hm,
Landscape view, to make the score easily readable on the screen (or steady on
the music stand)
I prefer portrait and I never play from the screen
Do not repeat rhytmic signs until they actually change value (much easier to
read in all respects, also for prima-vista)
For me this is very
On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Spring, aus dem, Rainer wrote:
Would you strike through everything in a book?
It would be a great improvement in many books.
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
]
To: List LUTELIST Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:26 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Spring, aus dem, Rainer wrote:
Would you strike through everything in a book?
It would be a great improvement in many books
-Original Message-
From: G. Crona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:34 PM
To: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
Yeah!
But jokes aside, if one would actually take a look at, and play from tablature
on the lines, one could
On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Spring, aus dem, Rainer wrote:
Hm,
Me too, mmm. I don't mean to answer Rainer here but will offer my
responses to the same questions to show my differing taste.
Landscape view, to make the score easily readable on the screen (or
steady on the music stand)
I
more important for accompaniment or
ensemble playing.
-Original Message-
From: Spring, aus dem, Rainer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:51 AM
To: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
-Original Message-
From: G. Crona
: tablature notation guidelines
-Original Message-
From: G. Crona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:34 PM
To: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
Yeah!
But jokes aside, if one would actually take a look at, and play from
tablature
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:51 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
-Original Message-
From: G. Crona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:34 PM
To: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re
to be antipodic in this matter.
pls. read between the lines...
- Original Message - From: Sean Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lute Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:52 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Spring, aus dem
On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Peter Nightingale wrote:
See Feynman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EZcpTTjjXY
Fascinating, captain. A prominent scientist offering two minutes of
meaningless generalities without a single fact. Completely illogical.
Yours truly.
Mr. Spock
--
To get on or
Hi,
New to ther Lute list, and just acquired a Renaissance lute and had a
wonderful lesson with
Ed Martin last Thursday.
I have been typesetting and transcribing music in Finale since 2000.
I just acquired and registered Fronimo last night.
What I am seeing in this thread are pleas for
For PDFs, Mac OSX has a built-in Print to PDF feature that works
well. For Windows there are free virtual printers around that also
work pretty well. I remember using one that had Pony in the name
(sorry to be so vague).
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
New to
Hit Reply instead of Reply All...
-Original Message-
From: Guy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:02 PM
To: 'Doc Rossi'
Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
Word 2007 has a Save to PDF feature (introduced with that version, I think).
Never
, 2008 1:02 PM
To: 'Doc Rossi'
Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
Word 2007 has a Save to PDF feature (introduced with that version, I
think).
Never tried it, though.
Guy
-Original Message-
From: Doc Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Portrait.
New rhythm sign at a change or at a new line. I have some poorly edited
publications in which a rhythm sign is redundantly introduced, and it just
causes confusion. Consistency within a piece is perhaps the better rule:
new sign only with a change of rhythm or line; or, all notes
I've never even asked.
Open Source is an interesting and sometimes useful approach to things, but
it has its limits.
Guy
-Original Message-
From: adS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 2:20 PM
To: Lute Net
Subject: [LUTE] Re: tablature notation guidelines
31 matches
Mail list logo
