Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
apologies for the length, but how is everyone else handling this?
this is the last thing i need to solve before i actually start running
all my services on this setup.
I was wondering
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
apologies for the length, but how is everyone else handling this?
this is the last thing i need to solve before i actually start running
all my services on this setup.
I was wondering
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 23:39 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
apologies for the length, but how is everyone else handling this?
this is the last thing i need
Matteo Ghezzi wrote:
2010/1/29 Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com:
Thanks for your answer.
Can you send the config file of the container ? it should be in
/var/lib/lxc/container_name/config or /etc/lxc/container_name.
The config file of the container
atp wrote:
Hi,
There is a /proc virtualization layer prototype with fuse which needs to
be enhanced but it's not for the short term as there are several issues
with the container itself to be solved before adding it.
But any volunteer is welcome ;)
I hacked up a quick
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Jean-Marc Pigeon (j...@safe.ca):
Hello,
I was wondering out loud about the best design to solve his problem.
If we try to redirect kernel-generated messages
Kumar L Srikanth-B22348 wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Linux Containers and Libvirt.
Recently, I installed Linux Container tools on my Fedora Core 12 (64
bit) machine and able to create/start/destroy my own containers using
the following commands:
lxc-create
lxc-sshd
lxc-start
lxc-destroy
And
set the target directory to '/'?
By the way, I am using libvirt version o.7.6.
I won't be able to answer as I don't know libvirt, it's better you ask
to the libvirt mailing list. This mailing list is for the lxc container
tools.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lezcano
Kumar L Srikanth-B22348 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Please see my inline comments.
Regards,
Srikanth
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezc...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 5:40 PM
To: Kumar L Srikanth-B22348
Cc: lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I mentioned this in an earlier posting that I was using the veth method
with bridges because I could NOT get macvlan to work. Problem is that
the containers will come up and will talk on the network but the host
can not talk to any of the guest containers. Ping
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Michael B. Trausch wrote:
Hello,
I am running LXC version 0.6.5, with kernel 2.6.32.7. I am having some
pretty significant troubles getting networking to reliably work with the
containers. That is to say, the host name is doing just fine, and
answers network
Michael B. Trausch wrote:
On 02/11/2010 03:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
If you do not set a mac address in the container configuration file, the
kernel will choose one for you preventing duplicate mac address on the
host.
Will it pick something that is static for each container? I'd like
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 09:47:33 01.04.2010 UTC-05 when se...@us.ibm.com did gyre and
gimble:
Here process drops root privileges, setuids to uid=103 and limits itself
to 3 processes with this uid. Clone fails due to fact there are two
processes with uid=103 running in
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Hi.
I have tried to run lxc tools from git and got the following output:
[dotted...@vertex:~]% sudo lxc-start --logfile=/dev/stderr
--logpriority=TRACE -n cf
lxc-start 1270236851.229 INFO lxc_conf - tty's configured
lxc-start 1270236851.229 ERROR
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
I this:
...
mountall: mount /dev/pts [25] terminated with status 1
mount: according to mtab, none is already mounted on /dev/shm
mountall: mount /dev/shm [26] terminated with status 1
mount: according to mtab, varrun is already mounted on /var/run
mountall: mount
Roman Yepishev wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to use LXC to run Ubuntu Lucid Lynx containers on Lucid Lynx
hosts. I have succeeded in configuring the container properly so it
starts, connects to the network etc.
However, as described in [1], my container can remount the /srv
partition
Roman Yepishev wrote:
Hello, Daniel.
Thanks for your reply!
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 09:41 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
When the container starts, it setup the root filesystem. The rootfs is
done with the pivot_root syscall, hence the old rootfs contains the
mount points which
Hi all,
did someone experienced the X server consuming 100% of CPU after
launching a container on Ubuntu 9.10 ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself.
stephane.rivi...@regis-dgac.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm using LXC to run Perl scripts that generate network traffic, using the
Net::RawIP package.
The scripts work perfectly well on a real host, but fail inside an LXC
container.
After a few hours of testing/debuging, the origin of the problem is
Przemysław Knycz wrote:
Hi!
At the first glance I would say it is not supported by the kernel yet.
Is there support for IFB or IMQ in container? 2.6.33 can support this?
IFB and IMQ are out of kernel tree, right ?
I am discovering IFB / IMQ. Are you asking if we can move a
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I can see that lxc-unshare isn't for me: I wanted to use it to avoid
adding the extra lxc-start process between two daemons communicating via
signals, but it's impossible to unshare PID namespaces, so
Yanick Emiliano wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have just started playing with lxc and having some difficulties to set cpu
and memory on my guests. After my searches, seems that resources controlling
is managing in cgroup files and I think that I missed something or I didn't
understand how deal with
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
empty lxc-r* directories: [...] Ok, this name comes from lxc-rootfs
in conf.c:setup_rootfs. After setup_rootfs_pivot_root returns
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
the (jailed) child. Of course I could hack around this by not
exec-ing lxc-start but keeping the shell around, trap all
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
empty lxc-r* directories
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
the (jailed) child
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
I get this error on thinclient boot: PXE-E32: TFTP open timeout
Can you give the version and the configuration of lxc, the host
configuration, the kernel version, and the circumstances of the problem ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
Host Environment:
Linux ltspserver01 2.6.32-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28
13:28:05 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lxc 0.6.5-1
Linux containers userspace tools
===
lxc.utsname = ltsp2
lxc.tty = 4
lxc.pts = 1024
lxc.network.type = veth
-unreachable
REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere
reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
=
The problem, perhaps, is with openbsd-inetd.
2010/5/12 Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr:
Osvaldo Filho
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve this. If rootfs is a
separate file system
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve
On 05/13/2010 06:17 PM, Christian Haintz wrote:
Hi,
At first LXC seams to be a great work from what we have read already.
There are still a few open questions for us (we are currently running
dozens of OpenVZ Hardwarenodes).
1) OpenVZ in the long-term seams to be a dead end. Will LXC be a
On 05/17/2010 05:00 PM, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I missed your mail in the spam filter :/
--
___
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
On 05/26/2010 11:07 AM, atp wrote:
Thanks to both for the replies.
This now makes sense. I've specified the rootfs.mount in the container
config, and it gets past there and boots ok.
Just in case anyone else cares, a very handy debug log can be had by
using this command.
lxc-start
On 05/13/2010 02:22 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
[ ... ]
I attached a proof-of-concept patch which seems to work good enough for
me. The function names are somewhat off now, but I leave that for later
Ferenc,
do you have definitive version for this ?
I have some modifications in the start
On 05/26/2010 08:10 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
On 5/26/2010 4:54 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
This is internal stuff of lxc. Before this commit, several temporary
directories were created and never destroyed, polluting '/tmp'.
In order to do
On 05/27/2010 10:21 AM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 27/05/10 18:06, atp wrote:
As requested:
ifconfig br0 from the host
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:37:4d:8c:d8
inet addr:192.168.1.206 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr:
On 05/27/2010 12:05 PM, Yanick Emiliano wrote:
Hi everybody
I would like know if lxc at this stage suppots centralization network
storage. I mean a Storage Filer , iSCSI, or *AoE storage*,For example can I
have all my rootfs on a network filer and start each VM on a specific device
storage
On 05/28/2010 02:58 AM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 28/05/10 05:55, Matt Bailey wrote:
/usr/sbin/ethtool -K br0 sg off
/usr/sbin/ethtool -K br0 tso off
Might fix your problem, YMMV; this worked for me.
Bam! Problem fixed.
All I needed was the 'sg' option - tso wasn't enabled anyway.
Now
On 06/01/2010 09:50 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
Am 01.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 06/01/2010 06:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/30/2010 07:07 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
Hi,
for all interested: attached you'll find a template script for ubuntu
containers.
Hi Willem,
thanks a lot
On 06/01/2010 10:12 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
Am 01.06.2010 20:05, schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 06/01/2010 09:50 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
Am 01.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 06/01/2010 06:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/30/2010 07:07 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
Hi,
for all interested: attached
On 06/01/2010 08:27 PM, atp wrote:
Ok,
absolutely the last post tonight. I promise.
I fixed the find /var/run -exec rm -f {} command in rc.sysinit.
Now the problem is that the runlevel is written whilst things are
still shutting down;
/lxc/test01.dev.tradefair/rootfs/var/run/utmp MODIFY
On 06/03/2010 09:51 AM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
Have few questions on lxc-execute :
1) Getting an error as :
[r...@guhan-fedora lxc]# lxc-execute --name=centos /bin/bash
lxc-execute: No such file or directory - failed to exec
/usr/libexec/lxc-init
[r...@guhan-fedora lxc]# lxc-execute
On 06/03/2010 06:24 PM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
Forgot to mention previously that I am able to successfully do lxc-start on
the same container and /bin/bash is also part of rootfs.
Here is the strace output (pretty long). Failure seems to be at :
[pid 2386] execve(/usr/libexec/lxc-init,
On 06/04/2010 05:44 PM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
Hi,
I tried to extend the fstab as below:
/etc/resolv.conf /lxc/lenny/rootfs.lenny/etc/
resolv.conf none bind 0 0
/test /testdir none bind 0 0--- I added this line
From the host :
# ls /testdir
a b c
From the container :
On 06/09/2010 09:15 PM, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
Is there a way to set the default gateway in a linux container ?
If I set an ipaddress in the config file
lxc.utsname = foo
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = br0
lxc.network.name = eth0
lxc.network.mtu = 1500
On 06/10/2010 11:25 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 06/09/2010 11:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/09/2010 10:46 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 06/09/2010 09:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/09/2010 08:45 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Is there a feature that allows
On 06/10/2010 10:54 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, John Drescher wrote:
BTW, a second option is lessfs.
http://www.lessfs.com/wordpress/?page_id=50
What about the KSM kernel option? It's aimed at KVM I think and in the
kernel from 2.6.32. See:
On 06/11/2010 11:08 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 06/11/2010 09:57 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/10/2010 10:54 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, John Drescher wrote:
BTW, a second option is lessfs.
http://www.lessfs.com/wordpress/?page_id=50
What about the KSM kernel option
On 06/17/2010 06:49 PM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
Hi,
Any reason why we require bridging in the host for lxc ? Am not able to
setup IP address for the container unless I configure bridge in the host.
You can use the macvlan but the container -- host communication won't
work.
Also couple of
On 06/22/2010 01:44 AM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
Hi,
Are the tools (lxc-create, lxc-enter etc.) and liblxc.so licensed
under GPL v2 or v3 ? Please let me know.
LGPL v2.1
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for
On 06/22/2010 07:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/22/2010 06:55 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 22 June 2010 17:32, Stuart Nixonstu...@rednut.net wrote:
Hello LXCers
When ever I start a lxc container the hosts Xorg process starts
consuming 100% cpu time.
Is this a known issue
On 06/22/2010 05:32 PM, Stuart Nixon wrote:
Hello LXCers
When ever I start a lxc container the hosts Xorg process starts
consuming 100% cpu time.
Is this a known issue? Are there any work-arounds to avoid this behaviour?
Ok, I think I got the problem.
Until I fix this, you can use the
On 06/22/2010 08:57 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 22 June 2010 19:50, Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote:
Until I fix this, you can use the workaround by specifying:
lxc-start -n name -s lxc.console=$(tty)
or lxc.console=/dev/null or lxc.console=mylog, whatever ...
This
Hi All,
Notes:
==
Bug fixes only.
ChangeLog:
==
Ciprian Dorin, Craciun (1):
lxc to apply mount options for bind mounts
Daniel Lezcano (6):
fix sshd template
fix bad free when reading the configuration file
fix default console to /dev/tty
fix
On 06/22/2010 07:25 AM, John Brendler wrote:
lxc fails to make read-only bind mounts as documented. Read-only bind
mounts are important to many use cases.
A simple patch has been submitted to the lxc-devel mailing list (by
Ciprian Dorin), but when I last checked, it was not clear if any
On 06/24/2010 11:16 PM, Papp Tamás wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote, On 2010. 06. 24. 22:38:
That's probably mean the container is already running. Did you checked
with lxc-ps --name fsn ?
Well, you are right. But shouldn't it also show it with lxc-ps --lxc ?
Yes, correct. The --lxc option
On 07/18/2010 04:36 PM, Clemens Perz wrote:
On 07/18/2010 02:39 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/18/2010 11:48 AM, Clemens Perz wrote:
Hi,
So doing a while on /var/lib/lxc as a starting point, run lxc-info on
each, find out which one is running, examine its cgroup and so
On 07/20/2010 01:58 PM, Nikola Simidzievski wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get Fedora 12 container on Ubuntu 10.4, but I have several
problems. I installed new rootfs using febootstrap , and configured it, and
created new fstab (guided form
On 07/22/2010 05:09 PM, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
Quoting Ferenc Holzhauser (ferenc.holzhau...@gmail.com):
I'm experiencing an annoying kernel crash each time I'm trying to use SSH X
forwarding into the container.
I can open an SSH session but as soon as I start an X app, the crash
On 07/24/2010 07:48 PM, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 00:14, Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.frwrote:
I am trying to reproduce the problem on my system with the same kernel but
it does not occur.
What network configuration are you using ?
I use following
On 07/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ferenc Holzhauser wrote:
On 26 July 2010 10:56, Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote:
On 07/26/2010 08:57 AM, Ferenc Holzhauser wrote:
Hi,
I beileve I can reproduce it and get a crash image.
Then apport or crash could possibly show something useful.
On 07/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ferenc Holzhauser wrote:
On 26 July 2010 10:56, Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote:
On 07/26/2010 08:57 AM, Ferenc Holzhauser wrote:
[ ... ]
I've already searched for a known issue based on the crash information
I have, with no luck.
I don't think I have
On 07/28/2010 10:59 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
Nice thats what I thought. I will build a 2.6.34.1 kernel. If
everything works like expected I will send you the updated patchset.
Cool. Thanks !
Does it have to be in the quilt format?
Yes if possible. You can send me directly a tarball, I will
On 07/30/2010 07:52 AM, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
What are the lxc and kernel version ?
config
lxc.utsname = lucid64
lxc.tty = 4
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = br0
lxc.network.name = eth0
lxc.network.mtu = 1500
lxc.network.ipv4 = 192.168.10.0/24
On 08/03/2010 07:53 PM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Osvaldo Filhoarquivos...@gmail.com wrote:
Why have this difference?
Client on container
[ 3] local 192.168.6.10 port 58172 connected with 192.168.6.1 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[
On 08/03/2010 03:10 AM, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
I want to jail users to a LTSP server.
I thought it would be easy to LXC. But I'm having problems.
- the ltsp-build-client - arch i386 does not end.
r...@localhost:/opt# ltsp-build-client --arch i386
...
I: Extracting upstart...
I: Extracting
On 08/04/2010 12:16 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/03/2010 03:10 AM, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
I want to jail users to a LTSP server.
I thought it would be easy to LXC. But I'm having problems.
- the ltsp-build-client - arch i386 does not end.
r...@localhost:/opt# ltsp-build-client --arch
On 08/04/2010 02:13 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
Here is a refreshed patch for 2.6.35.
The 2.6.34.2 kernel can use the 2.6.34.1 patch without problems.
I tested both and they work.
Uploaded ! Thanks Sebastian !
--
On 08/12/2010 01:05 AM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
Quoting Nirmal Guhan (vavat...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
Quoting Nirmal Guhan (vavat...@gmail.com):
On 08/19/2010 11:18 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
Hi folks,
I have the problem each time I launch a VM (no more result with the
sysctl setting). Any ideas to resolve this issue?
The dmesg:
[ 7560.404075] INFO: task mount:27788 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 7560.404123] echo 0
On 08/19/2010 02:33 PM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:29, Daniel Lezcanodlezc...@fr.ibm.com wrote:
Answering to your question, if you do lxc.network.type=macvlan, the
network stack will be private to your container.
Hi Daniel,
not sure I understand your
On 08/20/2010 09:16 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 23:23, Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote:
Hmm, it is very probable the problem is located in the kernel. This kind of
warnings appears when a task is in a uninterruptible state and the kernel
compilation
On 08/23/2010 01:13 PM, l...@jelmail.com wrote:
With some tweaks that maybe possible, but IMHO it is not adequate.
Lxc is not like QEMU/KVM or Virtualbox, the hardware is not virtualized,
so you may have conflicts with the differents X server because they will
share the same hardware (eg.
On 08/23/2010 03:01 PM, l...@jelmail.com wrote:
With some tweaks that maybe possible, but IMHO it is not adequate.
Lxc is not like QEMU/KVM or Virtualbox, the hardware is not virtualized,
so you may have conflicts with the differents X server because they will
share the same
On 08/25/2010 11:45 AM, Clemens Perz wrote:
Daniel,
maybe you want to have a look on this, too. The current debian templates
add lxc.pts = 1024 to the config.
If you have two containers with that setting and you start them, only
the first one started will give you access to the console. The
On 08/25/2010 12:51 PM, Clemens Perz wrote:
On 08/25/2010 12:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/25/2010 11:45 AM, Clemens Perz wrote:
Daniel,
maybe you want to have a look on this, too. The current debian templates
add lxc.pts = 1024 to the config.
If you have two containers
On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
I created a container with an interface. I stop it, I change the MAC
address, restart it:
lxc-start: ioctl failure : Cannot assign requested address
lxc-start: failed to setup hw address for 'eth0'
lxc-start: failed to setup netdev
lxc-start:
On 08/30/2010 02:11 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
On 08/30/2010 12:40 PM, Papp Tamás wrote:
In the tasks file I saw three processes: udevd, init and one more, which
I don't remember. I killed them all, but the cgroup still exists.
On 08/31/2010 12:23 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 08/30/2010 02:36 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamás (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
Daniel Lezcano wrote, On 2010. 08. 30. 13:08:
Usually, there is a mechanism
On 08/31/2010 12:07 PM, Papp Tamás wrote:
Serge E. Hallyn wrote, On 2010. 08. 31. 4:06:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 08/31/2010 12:23 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 08/30/2010 02:36 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting
On 09/07/2010 11:05 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running a 32 bit container on a 64 bit host system. Is there a
configuration option to set the architecture? Currently I'm using
'linux32 lxc-start -n NAME' to set the architecture.
hum, no. Maybe that would be worth to add a
On 09/13/2010 12:16 AM, Papp Tamás wrote:
Papp Tamás wrote, On 2010. 09. 12. 23:18:
hi!
I also tried with qemu and no problem.
I've just upgraded the box to Maverick, and after a short time it looks
better. After 1 hour still it's up and working.
I don't know, if it helps.
On 09/13/2010 10:15 AM, Ferenc Holzhauser wrote:
On 13 September 2010 00:16, Papp Tamástom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
Papp Tamás wrote, On 2010. 09. 12. 23:18:
hi!
I also tried with qemu and no problem.
I've just upgraded the box to Maverick, and after a short time it looks
better. After
On 09/16/2010 09:36 AM, Jue Hong wrote:
As I understand, running one application with the command lxc-execute
will create a container instance. E.g., by running lxc-execute -n foo
/bin/bash, a container named foo will be created, and I can find a foo
directory under the mounted cgroup
On 09/16/2010 10:56 AM, Jue Hong wrote:
Sure Daniel, what you say actually works. But I still want to know,
whether I can launch another app into a running container.
Doing as you say:
lxc-execute -n foo /bin/bash -- this bash runs inside container 'foo'
lxc-execute -n bar /bin/bash
On 09/17/2010 05:06 PM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
I hope so too:-)
Daniel do you have any news about this?
Yes, I had a private discussion last week with Eric Bierderman, and he
said he will send the patches for upstream at the end of this week or
next week if he has time and enough bandwidth to
On 09/17/2010 11:41 PM, l...@jelmail.com wrote:
Hi, I just tried to mount a filesystem in a container and I got this:
[root ~]# lxc-start -n mycontainer
lxc-start: Operation not permitted - failed to mount '/dev/sdd1' on
'/srv/lxc/mycontainer/mnt'
lxc-start: failed to setup the mounts for
On 09/20/2010 11:13 AM, l...@jelmail.com wrote:
As mentioned Serge, that maybe the cgroup device white list which
prevent you to do that.
You can check by temporarly comment out in /var/lib/lxc/mycontainer all
the lxc.cgroup.devices lines and then launch the container again. If
you
On 09/17/2010 10:27 AM, Scott Bronson wrote:
I have lxc working pretty well on my Ubuntu Lucid box. Now I'm trying
to get it to work on my Fedora 13 laptop but I can't seem to get it to
connect to any guest consoles.
I was able to reproduce it. I have the 'init' process and the
On 09/23/2010 05:28 AM, Scott Bronson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote: I was able to reproduce it. I have
the 'init' process and the 'mountall'
processes.
The latter is blocked on:
That smells right. Good find!
Wouldn't
On 09/24/2010 09:02 AM, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Hi,
I set up my first container and want to mount the home directories for the
users with automount/autofs5.
During installation of autofs5 in the container, it complained that it can't
create /dev/autofs. Create this node with mknod was
On 09/24/2010 12:31 PM, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Some more experiments:
The last lines of an strace look like this:
r...@cc2,~: strace ls -l /net/fs-v1
[...]
open(/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=26048, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 26048,
On 09/24/2010 12:31 PM, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Some more experiments:
The last lines of an strace look like this:
r...@cc2,~: strace ls -l /net/fs-v1
[...]
open(/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=26048, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 26048,
On 09/24/2010 05:17 PM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
Hi,
you need to setup snat or masquerading if you want your containers to
access the network.
# sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
snat (you need your ):
# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wlan0 -j SNAT --to-source=WLAN0_IP
OR
masquerading:
On 09/24/2010 03:03 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/24/2010 12:31 PM, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Some more experiments:
The last lines of an strace look like this:
r...@cc2,~: strace ls -l /net/fs-v1
[...]
open(/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode
On 09/27/2010 09:40 AM, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Lezcano schrieb am 25. Sep 2010 um 00:05:41 CEST:
It seems the patchset
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/3/20/68572/thread
was not taken upstream.
A quick look at the code, make me think the pids
On 09/27/2010 11:59 AM, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Daniel Lezcano schrieb am 27. Sep 2010 um 11:17:12 CEST:
Daniel Lezcano schrieb am 25. Sep 2010 um 00:05:41 CEST:
It seems the patchset
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/3/20/68572/thread
was not taken upstream
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
