Hi Uwe,
could you please have a look at this patch. I think you forgot something
in the scons script.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: schmitt
Date: Sun Mar 4 11:52:31 2007
New Revision: 17402
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17402
Log:
* scons/SConstruct: fix
Folks,
there are some exciting news!
The following patch removes the ugly dvipost/pplatex stuff and brings
change tracking to the pdflatex world!!!
Please have a look the attached ct-test.lyx to get an impression on what
we can do with the newly supported changes/changebar packages.
Guys,
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 04:29 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Dear LyX-documentation developers,
after JMarc's last change that now every language has its own folder in
LyX's SVN repository:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/
I rearranged the clipart folder in the following way
Am Samstag, 3. März 2007 02:29 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
Georg Baum wrote:
Please test.
Many thanks.
However,
+ // files with spaces are often enclosed in quotation marks
+ // those have to be removed
+ if (contains(foundfile, ' ') foundfile[0] == ''
+
Michael Gerz schrieb:
could you please have a look at this patch. I think you forgot something
in the scons script.
Yes I did. Many thanks to you and Georg for fixing this. Now everything works
as expected.
regards Uwe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Sun Mar 4 14:05:12 2007
| New Revision: 17404
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17404
| Log:
| compile fix.
| I have no idea whether this installs correctly, but it compiles at least.
Then why commit it?
You can test installs by using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Sun Mar 4 14:22:38 2007
| New Revision: 17405
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17405
| Log:
| Fix bug 3305
| * src/LaTeX.C
| (insertIfExists): Catch boost::filesystem exceptions, since they
| are not errors in this
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
And I am really annoyed at you keeping discussions _only_ in bugzilla.
Impossible for others to follow development then.
Wrong! If you watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bugzilla, you will
receive all changes to all bug reports (because John is our QA man).
Michael
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 15:38 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
This really feels wrong.
Suddenly it is tripple the complexity.
Do you have a better idea? The regexes will never be perfect, so we must be
able to test whether a given string denotes an existing file.
And I am really annoyed at
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 15:27 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Sun Mar 4 14:05:12 2007
| New Revision: 17404
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17404
| Log:
| compile fix.
| I have no idea whether this installs correctly, but it
In lyx-1.5.0svn (r17395) and on my linux box, when I ask lyx (in the
GUI) to reconfigure my latex configuration, I notice that it complains with
checking for an HTML previewer...
+checking for mozilla... no
+checking for netscape... no
However, there is no mozilla or netscape on linux at the
Anand Rangarajan schrieb:
When I change lib/configure.py on my linux box to the second line above,
a 'View HTML' option shows up in the GUI and I'm able to view HTML using
firefox.
I just committed a patch that adds firefox!
Michael
Am Freitag, 2. März 2007 23:40 schrieb Bernhard Roider:
The rule for using the lexer:
if you want to know if the lexer still has data to read (either from the
stream or from the pushed
token) then use lex.isOK().
If you want to test if the last reading operation was successful then use
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. März 2007 23:40 schrieb Bernhard Roider:
The rule for using the lexer:
if you want to know if the lexer still has data to read (either from the
stream or from the pushed
token) then use lex.isOK().
If you want to test if the last reading operation was
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
| And I am really annoyed at you keeping discussions _only_ in bugzilla.
| Impossible for others to follow development then.
|
| Wrong! If you watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bugzilla, you will
| receive all changes to all bug
The clock is ticking folks, deadline March 12!
I put two project proposals on the Wiki as well as I could write them. One
is my own original proposal, the other more general.
What we need is an administrator, a backup admin, and one or more mentors.
It's the organization that submits the
Dear list,
I'm trying to build 1.5.0beta1 on FreeBSD 6.1, but there seems a problem
with included boost. Up to 1.4.4 release, FreeBSD's lyx port was using
devel/boost in ports, not included one in lyx. However, it seems
lyx-1.5.0beta1 is using functions which is only in cvs, not release
version
Rex Dieter wrote:
José Matos wrote:
The code is improving (slowly) but we don't yet have a target date for
1.5.0.
OK, your opinion whether we should try to get lyx-1.5.0(beta
or not) into Fedora 7:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/7
target release May 24(ish)
OK, lacking any
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bernhard Roider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Ok, then here's the patch with const methods and mutable member
| variable. It fixes bug #3293.
The patch does a lot of small code shuffling that might change
behavior, so it porbably needs some testing. I'll leave it up to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
A space after '' as well please.
Also; can list be a const reference?
it can be a const reference -- new patch attached
Does the enableButtons() have a default arg?
If that is our own function I think it should be removed so that have
to use true/false
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
A space after '' as well please.
Also; can list be a const reference?
it can be a const reference -- new patch attached - now really
Does the enableButtons() have a default arg?
If that is our own function I think it should be removed so that have
to use
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bernhard Roider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hello Lars,
|
| as Abdel suggested i would like to ask you for SVN commit access, to
| be able to commit my contributions by myself.
I am a bit reluctant, especially since (pardon me if wrong) you havent
contributed much
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bernhard Roider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| @@ -150,9 +153,12 @@
| void QTocDialog::on_moveDownPB_clicked()
| {
same comment
Same comment to what?
| @@ -160,9 +166,12 @@
| void QTocDialog::on_moveInPB_clicked()
| {
same comment
ditto
| @@ -170,9
岩見昌範 wrote:
Hi.
The patch was split in two according to the instruction of Mr. Abdel.
support_dashed_underline.patch is a patch to
support dashed underline and reverse video.
Moreover, support_on_the_spot.patch is a patch to support on the
spot in cjk.
Hum it seems that you misunderstood me.
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog eats the new last paragraph.
This patch fixes that, BUT if you move the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx
crashes because in the method BufferView::center():
...
ParagraphMetrics const pm =
the commented line should be deleted in the code...
Index: src/toc.C
===
--- src/toc.C (revision 17395)
+++ src/toc.C (working copy)
@@ -81,12 +81,13 @@
pit_type const newpit = std::distance(bgn, dest);
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 02:58:15AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
But it doesn't... SIGNAL( clicked() ) is used elsewhere, not
SIGNAL(clicked() )
Indeed. I uniformed it now to SIGNAL( clicked() ).
But I still think that we should use SIGNAL(clicked()), but I won't
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move the
last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes because in
the method BufferView::center():
...
Bernhard Roider wrote:
the commented line should be deleted in the code...
Lars would have caught that I'm sure ;-)
Index: src/toc.C
===
--- src/toc.C
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because in the method
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because in the method
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett I just sent a note to the User's list indicating that, thanks
Bennett to Anders Ekberg, we have a new version of LyX-1.4.4-Mac-PPC,
Bennett which I believe solves problems users have been having.
Bennett Jean-Marc, could you put this new
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
pit_type const newpit = std::distance(bgn, dest);
L1 pit_type const len = std::distance(start, finish);
L2 pit += len;
-pit = std::min(pit, cur.lastpit());
-recordUndo(cur, Undo::ATOMIC,
Bernhard Roider wrote:
the code in BufferView::center() is:
CursorSlice bot = cursor_.bottom();
TextMetrics tm = text_metrics_[bot.text()];
pit_type const pit = bot.pit();
tm.redoParagraph(pit);
ParagraphMetrics const pm = tm.parMetrics(pit);
so maybe
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because in the method
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT ...
This one works now:
The problem was that pit is a reference to cur.pit() and was set to lastpit() + 1 before calling
Hum it seems that you misunderstood me. Surely because I did not make
myself clear :-(
I am sorry to have not been unable to take meaning of a passage
into consideration. Since I am not so good at English.
I wanted a patch for _on_the_spot_ support that was as minimal as
possible; that is to
Hi Uwe,
could you please have a look at this patch. I think you forgot something
in the scons script.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: schmitt
Date: Sun Mar 4 11:52:31 2007
New Revision: 17402
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17402
Log:
* scons/SConstruct: fix
Folks,
there are some exciting news!
The following patch removes the ugly dvipost/pplatex stuff and brings
change tracking to the pdflatex world!!!
Please have a look the attached ct-test.lyx to get an impression on what
we can do with the newly supported changes/changebar packages.
Guys,
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 04:29 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Dear LyX-documentation developers,
>
> after JMarc's last change that now every language has its own folder in
LyX's SVN repository:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/
>
> I rearranged the clipart folder in the
Am Samstag, 3. März 2007 02:29 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Georg Baum wrote:
> > Please test.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> However,
> > + // files with spaces are often enclosed in quotation marks
> > + // those have to be removed
> > + if (contains(foundfile, ' ') && foundfile[0]
Michael Gerz schrieb:
could you please have a look at this patch. I think you forgot something
in the scons script.
Yes I did. Many thanks to you and Georg for fixing this. Now everything works
as expected.
regards Uwe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Sun Mar 4 14:05:12 2007
| New Revision: 17404
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17404
| Log:
| compile fix.
| I have no idea whether this installs correctly, but it compiles at least.
Then why commit it?
You can test installs by using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Sun Mar 4 14:22:38 2007
| New Revision: 17405
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17405
| Log:
| Fix bug 3305
| * src/LaTeX.C
| (insertIfExists): Catch boost::filesystem exceptions, since they
| are not errors in this
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
And I am really annoyed at you keeping discussions _only_ in bugzilla.
Impossible for others to follow development then.
Wrong! If you watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bugzilla, you will
receive all changes to all bug reports (because John is our QA man).
Michael
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 15:38 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> This really feels wrong.
>
> Suddenly it is tripple the complexity.
Do you have a better idea? The regexes will never be perfect, so we must be
able to test whether a given string denotes an existing file.
> And I am really annoyed
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 15:27 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | Author: baum
> | Date: Sun Mar 4 14:05:12 2007
> | New Revision: 17404
> |
> | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17404
> | Log:
> | compile fix.
> | I have no idea whether this installs correctly,
In lyx-1.5.0svn (r17395) and on my linux box, when I ask lyx (in the
GUI) to reconfigure my latex configuration, I notice that it complains with
checking for an HTML previewer...
+checking for "mozilla"... no
+checking for "netscape"... no
However, there is no mozilla or netscape on linux at
Anand Rangarajan schrieb:
When I change lib/configure.py on my linux box to the second line above,
a 'View HTML' option shows up in the GUI and I'm able to view HTML using
firefox.
I just committed a patch that adds firefox!
Michael
Am Freitag, 2. März 2007 23:40 schrieb Bernhard Roider:
> The rule for using the lexer:
>
> if you want to know if the lexer still has data to read (either from the
stream or from the pushed
> token) then use "lex.isOK()".
> If you want to test if the last reading operation was successful then
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. März 2007 23:40 schrieb Bernhard Roider:
The rule for using the lexer:
if you want to know if the lexer still has data to read (either from the
stream or from the pushed
token) then use "lex.isOK()".
If you want to test if the last reading operation was
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
| > And I am really annoyed at you keeping discussions _only_ in bugzilla.
| > Impossible for others to follow development then.
| >
| Wrong! If you watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bugzilla, you will
| receive all changes to all
The clock is ticking folks, deadline March 12!
I put two project proposals on the Wiki as well as I could write them. One
is my own original proposal, the other more general.
What we need is an administrator, a backup admin, and one or more mentors.
It's the organization that submits the
Dear list,
I'm trying to build 1.5.0beta1 on FreeBSD 6.1, but there seems a problem
with included boost. Up to 1.4.4 release, FreeBSD's lyx port was using
devel/boost in ports, not included one in lyx. However, it seems
lyx-1.5.0beta1 is using functions which is only in cvs, not release
version
Rex Dieter wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
>> The code is improving (slowly) but we don't yet have a target date for
>> 1.5.0.
> OK, your opinion whether we should try to get lyx-1.5.0(beta
> or not) into Fedora 7:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/7
> target release May 24(ish)
OK,
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bernhard Roider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ok, then here's the patch with const methods and mutable member
| variable. It fixes bug #3293.
The patch does a lot of small code shuffling that might change
behavior, so it porbably needs some testing. I'll leave it up
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
A space after '&' as well please.
Also; can list be a const reference?
it can be a const reference --> new patch attached
Does the enableButtons() have a default arg?
If that is our own function I think it should be removed so that have
to use true/false
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
A space after '&' as well please.
Also; can list be a const reference?
it can be a const reference --> new patch attached - now really
Does the enableButtons() have a default arg?
If that is our own function I think it should be removed so that have
to use
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bernhard Roider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello Lars,
|
| as Abdel suggested i would like to ask you for SVN commit access, to
| be able to commit my contributions by myself.
I am a bit reluctant, especially since (pardon me if wrong) you havent
contributed
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bernhard Roider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| @@ -150,9 +153,12 @@
| void QTocDialog::on_moveDownPB_clicked()
| {
same comment
Same comment to what?
| @@ -160,9 +166,12 @@
| void QTocDialog::on_moveInPB_clicked()
| {
same comment
ditto
| @@ -170,9
岩見昌範 wrote:
Hi.
The patch was split in two according to the instruction of Mr. Abdel.
"support_dashed_underline.patch" is a patch to
support "dashed underline" and "reverse video".
Moreover, "support_on_the_spot.patch" is a patch to support "on the
spot" in cjk.
Hum it seems that you
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog eats the new last paragraph.
This patch fixes that, BUT if you move the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx
crashes because in the method BufferView::center():
...
ParagraphMetrics const & pm =
the commented line should be deleted in the code...
Index: src/toc.C
===
--- src/toc.C (revision 17395)
+++ src/toc.C (working copy)
@@ -81,12 +81,13 @@
pit_type const newpit = std::distance(bgn, dest);
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 02:58:15AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
>
> >But it doesn't... "SIGNAL( clicked() )" is used elsewhere, not
> >"SIGNAL(clicked() )"
>
> Indeed. I uniformed it now to "SIGNAL( clicked() )".
>
> >But I still think that we should use
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move the
last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes because in
the method BufferView::center():
...
Bernhard Roider wrote:
the commented line should be deleted in the code...
Lars would have caught that I'm sure ;-)
Index: src/toc.C
===
--- src/toc.C
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because in the method
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because in the method
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I just sent a note to the User's list indicating that, thanks
Bennett> to Anders Ekberg, we have a new version of LyX-1.4.4-Mac-PPC,
Bennett> which I believe solves problems users have been having.
Bennett> Jean-Marc, could you
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
pit_type const newpit = std::distance(bgn, dest);
L1 pit_type const len = std::distance(start, finish);
L2 pit += len;
-pit = std::min(pit, cur.lastpit());
-recordUndo(cur, Undo::ATOMIC,
Bernhard Roider wrote:
the code in BufferView::center() is:
CursorSlice & bot = cursor_.bottom();
TextMetrics & tm = text_metrics_[bot.text()];
pit_type const pit = bot.pit();
tm.redoParagraph(pit);
ParagraphMetrics const & pm = tm.parMetrics(pit);
so maybe
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because in the method
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT if you move
the last paragraph up and press undo afterwards then lyx crashes
because
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello,
description of bug 3303: moving the last section up in the toc dialog
eats the new last paragraph. This patch fixes that, BUT ...
This one works now:
The problem was that pit is a reference to cur.pit() and was set to lastpit() + 1 before calling
Hum it seems that you misunderstood me. Surely because I did not make
myself clear :-(
I am sorry to have not been unable to take meaning of a passage
into consideration. Since I am not so good at English.
I wanted a patch for _on_the_spot_ support that was as minimal as
possible; that is to
76 matches
Mail list logo
