Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 07:40:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/27/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:14:23PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > >> For now, then, let's just change the naming scheme so people have some > >> better idea what these files are.

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:14:23PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >> For now, then, let's just change the naming scheme so people have some >> better idea what these files are. OK? > +1 Committed. rh

Re: Plan for 2.2.0rc1

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:55:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > It's hard to keep track, updates on the situation > would be helpful. OK I will send a new update soon. It is difficult for me to decide when to start a new update thread. For example, we are discussing which Qt version it is

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

Actually this is exactly the idea I came up with afterwards. Thanks for the patch. Jmarc Le 27 mars 2016 22:33:12 GMT+02:00, Richard Heck a écrit : > >Idea attached. > >Richard

Re: Plan for 2.2.0rc1

Le 27/03/2016 23:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 09:33:12PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: So once again, please release RC1. I don't see why we should wait any longer. We all want to release RC1 as soon as possible. But there are blockers. Please see the other threads

Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 09:38:34PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 20.03.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >Peter stated [1] that the patch is not necessary for compilation with > >MSVC 2010. > > But it doesn't harm then, see my today's post in the plans thread. > > >It seems the majority

Re: Plan for 2.2.0rc1

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 09:33:12PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > So once again, please release RC1. I don't see why we should wait any > longer. We all want to release RC1 as soon as possible. But there are blockers. Please see the other threads discussing these issues. We are making progress thanks

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:14:23PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > For now, then, let's just change the naming scheme so people have some > better idea what these files are. OK? +1 Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: lyx-cvs messages: show file names changed

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:52:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 18/02/2016 02:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Would anyone else find it useful if the lyx-cvs messages showed the file > >> names that were changed at the beginning of a message? One example is >

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:00:14PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, > > that these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving, > > closing and reopening the document convert them to the

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 2016-03-25, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/25/2016 02:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> 3. The LaTeX class file associated with the layout have been updated. >> (3) is the most complicated case and the rest of this discussion is >> focused on it. We can break down (3) further: >> 3a. The updated

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

On 03/27/2016 04:43 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016 um 16:33:12, schrieb Richard Heck >> On 03/27/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : I suspect a compiler bug. What is your compiler? Can you

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016 um 16:33:12, schrieb Richard Heck > On 03/27/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > >> I suspect a compiler bug. What is your compiler? Can you try another > >> one? > > > > I think I know what

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

On 27/03/2016 11:00 p.m., Georg Baum wrote: Andrew Parsloe wrote: I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, that these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving, closing and reopening the document convert them to the logos, nor do they display as

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

On 03/27/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> I suspect a compiler bug. What is your compiler? Can you try another >> one? > > I think I know what happens: in TextClass.cpp, we have > InsetLayout DocumentClass::plain_insetlayout_; > >

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 2016-03-25, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/25/2016 05:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> We should select different layout naming to be prepared for the case >> that someone creates later a new foo1.cls file. If we use the version naming scheme given in the cls file, this is a very unlikely case. In

Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

Am 20.03.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Peter stated [1] that the patch is not necessary for compilation with MSVC 2010. But it doesn't harm then, see my today's post in the plans thread. It seems the majority opinion is to release rc1 (and final 2.2.0) with Qt 5.5.1 compiled with

Re: Plan for 2.2.0rc1

Am 19.03.2016 um 08:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Uwe, are you OK with shipping the official RC1 with 5.5.1 and MSVC 2010? From what I understand, that's the recommendation of Georg and Peter and it seems like the safest approach. This is not fine with me. My spare time is limited and I need

Re: [PATCH] Fix regression with end-of-par markers

Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016 um 19:37:33, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 26/03/2016 20:58, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Much more of output, but this time not always the same. > > > > insetfont: Roman, Medium, Upright, Tiny, none, Emphasis Off, Underline Off, > > Strikeout

Static member initialization ordering bug (was: [PATCH] Fix regression with end-of-par markers)

Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : I suspect a compiler bug. What is your compiler? Can you try another one? I think I know what happens: in TextClass.cpp, we have InsetLayout DocumentClass::plain_insetlayout_; The InsetLayout constructor says: InsetLayout::InsetLayout() :

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

Le 27/03/2016 20:14, Richard Heck a écrit : For now, then, let's just change the naming scheme so people have some better idea what these files are. OK? I am OK with any decision on this subject. I was only thinking aloud. JMarc

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 01:13 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 19:01, Richard Heck a écrit : >> Yes, that would be possible. Could this be done at program >> configuration? Don't we set up some version.h file at that time into >> which this could go? I don't really feel like parsing the

Re: [PATCH] Fix regression with end-of-par markers

Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Try this patch instead, which shows the font size of the default insetlayout. Here I have (lots of) plain insetlayout fontsize: 12 This is INHERIT_SIZE. The font of the default inset layout should be all_inherit. I suspect a compiler bug.

Re: [PATCH] Fix regression with end-of-par markers

Le 26/03/2016 20:58, Kornel Benko a écrit : Much more of output, but this time not always the same. insetfont: Roman, Medium, Upright, Tiny, none, Emphasis Off, Underline Off, Strikeout Off, Double underline Off, Wavy underline Off, Noun Off, The problem is this one. The inset font of the

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

Le 27/03/2016 19:01, Richard Heck a écrit : Yes, that would be possible. Could this be done at program configuration? Don't we set up some version.h file at that time into which this could go? I don't really feel like parsing the output from "lyx2lyx -l" at runtime, though it could presumably be

Re: [LyX/master] Norwegian files: add missing \origin tag

Am 23.03.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Helge Hafting: Just a little question - what is this \origin tag? I didn't find it in the user's guide. Is it available somewhere in the document settings? This tag is a new one stored in the LyX file. This has something to do with the master/slave file

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 12:52 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 18:29, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 03/27/2016 03:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe >>> a way to disable the feature. >>> >>> Do we have a way to obtain the

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

Le 27/03/2016 18:29, Richard Heck a écrit : On 03/27/2016 03:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to disable the feature. Do we have a way to obtain the real world version number (2.1). This would be easier to understand

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 03:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to > disable the feature. > > Do we have a way to obtain the real world version number (2.1). This would be > easier to understand than 437. I think we'd just have to

Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > I keep track of missing things in layouttranslations.review. > > In last releases when strings were frozen, I wrote to all translators to > > check few additional items. > > > > I missed the freeze-string

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 06:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to >> disable the feature. >> >> Do we have a way to obtain the real world version

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Then we use the LyX format. But this is for a minority of users. > Indeed, makes sense. Liviu > Jmarc > > Le 27 mars 2016 12:03:37 GMT+02:00, Liviu Andronic a > écrit : >>On Sun, Mar

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

Then we use the LyX format. But this is for a minority of users. Jmarc Le 27 mars 2016 12:03:37 GMT+02:00, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On this subject, shouldn't there also be a logo for XeTeX? If you need one it could be added. So far nobody asked for it, and there are a couple more (LuaTeX, XeLaTeX etc). Georg

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to > disable the feature. > > Do we have a way to obtain the real world version number (2.1). This would be > easier to understand than

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

Andrew Parsloe wrote: > I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, > that these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving, > closing and reopening the document convert them to the logos, nor do > they display as logos in the pdf. > > However, if I

Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

Pavel Sanda wrote: > I keep track of missing things in layouttranslations.review. > In last releases when strings were frozen, I wrote to all translators to > check few additional items. > > I missed the freeze-string message on the dev list to react appropriately > at the time; I still planned

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to disable the feature. Do we have a way to obtain the real world version number (2.1). This would be easier to understand than 437. Jmarc Le 27 mars 2016 07:52:50 GMT+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :