Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 um 21:16:33, schrieb Georg Baum
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/
>
> Builds and runs fine on debian 8.1, except when
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:05:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 24/05/16 à 22:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > I guess that one problem will be with the UI files.
> >
> > I don't understand. Why would the UI files cause a problem? Do you mean
> > because if we have to choose between
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading
> > the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors.
>
> Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your
With 2.2.0 suddenly by-passing RC2 and being released, I'm afraid I'm a
bit behind asking for translations for 2.1.5, the final release in the
2.1.x series. Please prepare translations as soon as you are able: by
Friday, 3 June, if at all possible. Let me know if that timeline is too
tight.
On 05/24/2016 06:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading
>> the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors.
>
> Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your patient work.
>
> I built it
Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading
the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors.
Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your patient work.
I built it now and noticed 2 things:
- There is a dataloss
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:58:02AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 24/05/2016 00:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>Le 23/05/2016 à 03:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >>>commit
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 12/01/2016 10:15, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> More important is - can you reproduce the behaviour? It's pretty clear
> on my
> machine without trying any special conditions, just high repeat rate
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:27:04PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:39:15PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Do we wait for a cygwin installer before announcing? Is Enrico the one
> > who takes care of this? I had forgotten that we provided cygwin
> > installers for
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:39:15PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Do we wait for a cygwin installer before announcing? Is Enrico the one
> who takes care of this? I had forgotten that we provided cygwin
> installers for the final realize until I looked at
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.1.0/
Le 24/05/2016 16:03, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 05/24/2016 04:02 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Richard, one shortcut conflict resolution should be backported to 2.1.5.
Okay to push ?
Yes, that's fine.
Done
--
Jean-Pierre
Do we wait for a cygwin installer before announcing? Is Enrico the one
who takes care of this? I had forgotten that we provided cygwin
installers for the final realize until I looked at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.1.0/
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Le 24/05/16 à 22:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I guess that one problem will be with the UI files.
I don't understand. Why would the UI files cause a problem? Do you mean
because if we have to choose between a .ui that looks good on Qt 4 or
looks good on Qt 5 we will choose Qt 5 and cannot use
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:40:46PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 24/05/16 à 21:31, Georg Baum a écrit :
> > > For these reasons as well, I am hoping that for 2.3 the community of LyX
> > > developers will choose to focus on qt >= 5.6.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > However, I also agree with
Le 24/05/16 à 21:31, Georg Baum a écrit :
For these reasons as well, I am hoping that for 2.3 the community of LyX
developers will choose to focus on qt >= 5.6.
+1
However, I also agree with Jean-Marc: As long as keeping LyX compilable with
qt 4.8 is close to zero effort we should support 4.8
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Because on the other hand with qt4 there is the critical
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9362. I also noticed that lyx is very
> slow with qt4 now, with profiling showing that most of the time is spent
> in QTextLine::setLineWidth() below GuiFontMetrics::breakAt(). In
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at
>
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/
Builds and runs fine on debian 8.1, except when configuring with version
suffix: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10159. Since this also happens with
2.1.4 it
On 05/24/2016 04:02 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 23/05/2016 23:22, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Jean-Marc pointed out to me a mistake and a shortcut conflict, I have
>> 2 commits
>> ready fot these. Should this wait for 2.2.1 or may I push to master ?
>>
>
> Richard, one
Le 24/05/2016 à 00:51, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Do you know any other bug on Linux+qt5.5.1 than
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9731 ?
Because on the other hand with qt4 there is the critical
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9362. I also noticed that lyx is very
slow with qt4 now, with profiling
Le 23/05/2016 23:22, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Hello,
Jean-Marc pointed out to me a mistake and a shortcut conflict, I have 2 commits
ready fot these. Should this wait for 2.2.1 or may I push to master ?
Richard, one shortcut conflict resolution should be backported to 2.1.5.
Okay to
Le 24/05/2016 00:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/05/2016 à 03:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
commit 63153b89376cf120a1a9ba818624f36f9d23f292
Author: Enrico Forestieri
Date: Mon May 23 03:04:55 2016
21 matches
Mail list logo