Le 27/12/2021 à 20:30, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
Regarding the problem at hand, as an example, my suggestion is to change:
\converter pdf4 pdf8 "python $$s/scripts/convert_pdf.py $$i $$o ebook"
to
\converter pdf4 pdf8 "$${python} $$s/scripts/convert_pdf.py $$i $$o
ebook"
The idea is
Le 27/12/2021 à 19:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
It is not that I am not interested, but rather that I am incompetent in
these things. Did someone look for subsequent commits in the lyx-unstable
tree?
I took a quick look and did not see anything right after.
I just compiled lyx-unstable and
Le 27/12/2021 à 17:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I did not check carefully, but I *think* the patch fixes the following
ctest that was failing:
export/doc/ja/Tutorial_pdf5_systemF
Good news. Still, I'd like to hear Jürgen's thoughts on that.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
On Saturday, 25 December 2021 18.32.21 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 12:58:19PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Hi Scott,
I find you choice of dates very convenient. :-)
https://journeys.dartmouth.edu/folklorearchive/2016/11/12/halloween-and-christmas/
“Why do programmers
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 12:30:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 27/12/2021 à 10:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 11:06:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > Anyway if no one is interested in understading underlying issue I would
> > > > favour
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 07:40:38PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:32:39 -0500
> schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500
> > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec
Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:32:39 -0500
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500
> > schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > > Le
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500
> schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > > I did some brief tests on
As per our personal conversation, I have seen this too, over the
weekend.
The window offers two choices one (something like) "Learn more...", the
other "ok".
If you click on "Learn more..." it takes you to
https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2
Can it be that this is caused by
Le 27/12/2021 à 17:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 07:51:35AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
In the attached example, there is a space between the main text and the
note inset. If I put the cursor at the end of the second visual line
(see the screenshot for what I refer to
Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > I did some brief tests on other documents and it works fine from what I
> > > can see. Small typo: "an
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > I did some brief tests on other documents and it works fine from what I
> > can see. Small typo: "an non" -> "a non".
>
> Thanks.
>
> > > What else could I try to be
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 07:51:35AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> In the attached example, there is a space between the main text and the
> note inset. If I put the cursor at the end of the second visual line
> (see the screenshot for what I refer to visual lines), it appears to be
> after the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:29:08AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> It seems there has been a lot of activity on cprotect, and some fixes after
> JMarc's big patch. Where do people think things are now?
> Are we settled
No.
> enough to move on to beta?
Yes :)
It would be nice though to
It seems there has been a lot of activity on cprotect, and some fixes
after JMarc's big patch. Where do people think things are now? Are we
settled enough to move on to beta? I still need to look at some of
Daniel's patches, but I'll get to that in the next few days.
Riki
--
lyx-devel
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 09:55:11AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 26.12.2021 um 12:15 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Strangely I could not create an example (to put in tests) that fails
> > to compile with 2.3.0 (no cprotect) but compiles with master (which
> > uses
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:32:49AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:41:49 +0100
> schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > I guess clang is not happy with (((struct sockaddr_un *) 0)->sun_path)
> > > >
> > > > Our own
Le 27/12/2021 à 10:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 11:06:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Anyway if no one is interested in understading underlying issue I would favour
reverting 65b674ba4eff of unknown crash than keeping known freeze :)
Thanks, Pavel. This seems like a
Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:41:49 +0100
schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > I guess clang is not happy with (((struct sockaddr_un *) 0)->sun_path)
> > >
> > > Our own code has:
> > > #if !defined(SUN_LEN)
> > > #define SUN_LEN(su) \
> > >
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 07:55:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Normally, if the theme is transparent, the workarea should blink.
No problem like this here. It must be very specific WM config.
> However, looking at the latest information on the bug report
>
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 11:06:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Anyway if no one is interested in understading underlying issue I would
> > favour
> > reverting 65b674ba4eff of unknown crash than keeping known freeze :)
>
> Thanks, Pavel. This seems like a tricky issue to debug.
If JMarc
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I guess clang is not happy with (((struct sockaddr_un *) 0)->sun_path)
> >
> > Our own code has:
> > #if !defined(SUN_LEN)
> > #define SUN_LEN(su) \
> > (sizeof (*(su)) - sizeof ((su)->sun_path) + strlen((su)->sun_path))
>
Am Sonntag, dem 26.12.2021 um 12:15 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Strangely I could not create an example (to put in tests) that fails
> to compile with 2.3.0 (no cprotect) but compiles with master (which
> uses cprotect). I wonder if a LaTeX figure improved this situation in
> the last couple
23 matches
Mail list logo
