Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 18:43 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> It is not easier. The only thing that is easier before C++17 is
> std::make_pair. See good discussion here:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9270563/what-is-the-purpose-of-stdmake-pair-vs-the-constructor-of-stdpair
>
Le 7 déc. 2022 à 17:21, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>
> Am 07.12.2022 um 16:21 schrieb Daniel CLEMENT via lyx-users
> :
>>
>> Dear list members,
>>
>> I have monitored last month’s threads about LyX woes under macOS 13. There
>> wasn’t a definite conclusion it seems.
>>
>> Would you say it’s
Hi Daniel,
I have used LyX 2.3.6.2 under Ventura and did find that it crashed regularly.
Since the version on LyX.org is still only compiled for Intel, perhaps Rosetta
is the problem.
And just to note, in case it is helpful: if you are familiar with Linux and
have, or don’t mind purchasing, a
I run Ventura on and Intel and on a M1 box and had no problems
whatsoever. I keep Monterey on an iMac and a MacPro (which don't want
to be upgrade to Ventura).
I think the issue is that each major version number upgrade requires a
new installation of the XCode command line tools which seem to
Provides a framework into which sections from other parts of Additional.lyx
and new sections will be moved in one by one.>From 52b8c16b0e9834d983b9097726a02b5d0d4ab15e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John R Hudson
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:01:46 +
Subject: [PATCH] New chapter 3 Document
Le 07/12/2022 à 18:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 18:15 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
My comment that it is a C++11 thing is probably wrong. I did not
check what level of standard allows QPair without specialization.
This issue was the reason why std::pair
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 18:15 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> My comment that it is a C++11 thing is probably wrong. I did not
> check what level of standard allows QPair without specialization.
> This issue was the reason why std::pair has a make_pair(), I think.
I am completely
Le 07/12/2022 à 17:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 17:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
This elicited the answer "Huh?" from Jürgen, but sent to the lyx-cvs
list, so only Riki and I saw it.
Could I have a authoritative answer to the question whether a
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:45:10PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 11:25 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > A slightly off-topic question: why use QPair instead of std::pair?
>
> I just wanted to stick within the Qt family, as I use here QVector and
> QString.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 06.12.2022 um 22:25 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Not sure if any better, but perhaps an alternative: could lyx2lyx
> > just copy the module into the local layout? That is, the module could
> > be hidden
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 11:25 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> A slightly off-topic question: why use QPair instead of std::pair?
I just wanted to stick within the Qt family, as I use here QVector and
QString.
--
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 17:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> This elicited the answer "Huh?" from Jürgen, but sent to the lyx-cvs
> list, so only Riki and I saw it.
>
> Could I have a authoritative answer to the question whether a
> constructor like QPair(a, b) can be replaced
Am Dienstag, dem 06.12.2022 um 22:25 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Not sure if any better, but perhaps an alternative: could lyx2lyx
> just copy the module into the local layout? That is, the module could
> be hidden somewhere accessible to lyx2lyx and if it sees the .lyx
> file load the module
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.12.2022 um 08:56 +0100 schrieb JP:
> Should not this apply to other removed layouts ?
Yes, this applies to all layouts. Which ones have been removed?
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Le 07/12/2022 à 17:19, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I see a lot of
lyx2lyx warning: noprefix "false"
in the console when loading files. Is this a forgotten debug message ?
I was assuming that should be there, but perhaps it's not a problem if
it isn't?
Maybe we don't even need this
Le 07/12/2022 à 17:21, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 12/7/22 11:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 06/12/2022 à 16:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
commit f3f478c2fbcf89302ccadeb30aac413a40039d12
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Tue Dec 6 17:12:45 2022 +0100
C++11 compilation
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:04:58PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/12/2022 à 16:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> > commit f3f478c2fbcf89302ccadeb30aac413a40039d12
> > Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> > Date: Tue Dec 6 17:12:45 2022 +0100
> >
> > C++11 compilation fix
>
> >
Am 07.12.2022 um 16:21 schrieb Daniel CLEMENT via lyx-users
:
>
> Dear list members,
>
> I have monitored last month’s threads about LyX woes under macOS 13. There
> wasn’t a definite conclusion it seems.
>
> Would you say it’s safe to upgrade to MacOS13 now (with LyX 2.3.6.2)?
>
> When I
On 12/7/22 11:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 06/12/2022 à 16:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
commit f3f478c2fbcf89302ccadeb30aac413a40039d12
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Tue Dec 6 17:12:45 2022 +0100
C++11 compilation fix
for (iter = refs_.begin(); iter !=
On 12/7/22 10:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 05/12/2022 à 19:50, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
commit 4966da6864df0f53a12fe1453ce749452431df88
Author: Richard Kimberly Heck
Date: Mon Dec 5 14:45:40 2022 -0500
Add conversion routine for format 612.
I forgot that this is
Le 06/12/2022 à 16:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
commit f3f478c2fbcf89302ccadeb30aac413a40039d12
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Tue Dec 6 17:12:45 2022 +0100
C++11 compilation fix
for (iter = refs_.begin(); iter != refs_.end(); ++iter) {
// first:
Le 05/12/2022 à 19:50, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
commit 4966da6864df0f53a12fe1453ce749452431df88
Author: Richard Kimberly Heck
Date: Mon Dec 5 14:45:40 2022 -0500
Add conversion routine for format 612.
I forgot that this is needed, because the new parameter is written
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:32:29AM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 22:25 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Not sure if any better, but perhaps an alternative: could lyx2lyx
> > just
> > copy the module into the local layout? That is, the module could be
> > hidden somewhere
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:12:37PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> commit a66ee4109ee84a4a501dbaa29580cdefe1aadd36
> Author: Stephan Witt
> Date: Wed Dec 7 00:08:11 2022 +0100
>
> Add OS version info to About box.
> ---
> src/frontends/qt/GuiAbout.cpp |6 ++
> 1 files changed, 6
On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 22:25 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Not sure if any better, but perhaps an alternative: could lyx2lyx
> just
> copy the module into the local layout? That is, the module could be
> hidden somewhere accessible to lyx2lyx and if it sees the .lyx file
> load
> the module it
25 matches
Mail list logo
