Re: Docbook support? (was Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.5 (status update #1)

2008-05-05 Thread Chris Karakas
José Matos wrote: On Monday 21 April 2008 10:30:23 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: By the way, where are we WRT docbook support? Is there anything we can do to support the request of Chris Karakas who is still using LyX-1.2 apparently? http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ I

Re: Docbook support? (was Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.5 (status update #1)

2008-05-05 Thread Chris Karakas
> José Matos wrote: > > On Monday 21 April 2008 10:30:23 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > >> By the way, where are we WRT docbook support? Is there anything we can > >> do to support the request of Chris Karakas who is still using LyX-1.2 > >> apparent

Re: DocBook

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Karakas
-- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Karakas
I'd be really happy if you could add paragraph or two about DocBook, LyX etc to this wiki page (I just created it): http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocBook Done. :-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Karakas
very soon. Enjoy! :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Karakas
> I'd be really happy if you could add paragraph or two about DocBook, LyX > etc to this wiki page (I just created it): > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocBook > Done. :-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook

2007-09-19 Thread Chris Karakas
to your writing needs: - GUI (LyX), don't bother about SGML. - Table of Contents, - cross-references, - Index, - Bibliography, - Mathematics everything is covered. You press the button, lyxtox does the rest - enjoy! :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook

2007-09-19 Thread Chris Karakas
a *complete* solution to your writing needs: - GUI (LyX), don't bother about SGML. - Table of Contents, - cross-references, - Index, - Bibliography, - Mathematics everything is covered. You press the button, lyxtox does the rest - enjoy! :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: Lyx website and Docbook XML

2006-11-29 Thread Chris Karakas
/mySGML/formats.html -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: Lyx website and Docbook XML

2006-11-29 Thread Chris Karakas
not work with those scripts. However, you get fine docs as in: http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/formats.html -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Missing CREDITS file - who are the authors of LyX?

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Karakas
think) in the 1.4.0 tarball, but nothing... LyX developers seem to be very modest people... Who are they? Please give me a list to include in the RPM Authors tag - so I can finally release it to all the eager folks out there. :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: LyX 1.4.0 and DocBook SGML

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Karakas
/mySGML.lyx import it, then export it to DocBook and try to pass it through Openjade? ;-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Missing CREDITS file - who are the authors of LyX?

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Karakas
ng to the GPL, I think) in the 1.4.0 tarball, but nothing... LyX developers seem to be very modest people... Who are they? Please give me a list to include in the RPM Authors tag - so I can finally release it to all the eager folks out there. :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: LyX 1.4.0 and DocBook SGML

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Karakas
you inserted with Insert->URL) *inside* an SGML environment (which now is ERT), then this is exported as "^A" istead of "http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/mySGML.lyx import it, then export it to DocBook and try to pass it through Openjade? ;-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

LyX 1.4.0 and DocBook SGML

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Karakas
procedures to support LyX 1.4 (currently it seems that only LyX 1.2 will work with them). Any suggestions? Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: LyX 1.4.0 and DocBook SGML

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Karakas
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 22:01 schrieb Chris Karakas: Whatever I had written in pure SGML is now exported as if it were normal text, with becoming /caution, for example. Do you mean that in 1.2 you can write in normal text and that it will be output as ? If yes, then the lyx2lyx

LyX 1.4.0 and DocBook SGML

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Karakas
was written LyX 1.2, so I have an interest in extending my procedures to support LyX 1.4 (currently it seems that only LyX 1.2 will work with them). Any suggestions? Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: LyX 1.4.0 and DocBook SGML

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Karakas
> Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 22:01 schrieb Chris Karakas: > > > Whatever I had written in pure SGML is now exported as if it were normal > text, with "" becoming "", for example. > > Do you mean that in 1.2 you can write in normal text and that it >

Re: DocBook support

2005-03-07 Thread Chris Karakas
of Figures and even Bibliography with RefDB (http://refdb.sourceforge.net) and Mathematics (even in HTML!) in HTML, PDF, PS, TXT and even RTF - today, here and now. :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook support

2005-03-07 Thread Chris Karakas
ith images, equations, Table of Contents, Index, List of Figures and even Bibliography with RefDB (http://refdb.sourceforge.net) and Mathematics (even in HTML!) in HTML, PDF, PS, TXT and even RTF - today, here and now. :-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

LyX and DocBook: Permission to include parts of LyX Documentation

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Karakas
technical information, is a great help and would be greatly appreciated. Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: LyX and DocBook: Permission to include parts of LyX Documentation

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Karakas
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.03.05 16:41:25: Chris Karakas wrote: Am I allowed to do it? Yes, so long as your licence is compatible with the GPL. Thanks for answering! GPL you say? Now if only someone could assure me that the statement GPL is compatible with GFDL

Re: LyX and DocBook: Permission to include parts of LyX Documentation

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Karakas
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.03.05 19:05:33: Chris Karakas wrote: Now the LyX User's Guide does NOT contain the Disclaimer This can be added. Use a comment environment or a note inset (depending on your version of LyX). I know, but the Disclaimer

LyX and DocBook: Permission to include parts of LyX Documentation

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Karakas
t pieces together from other sources, without having to rephrase just to convey the same technical information, is a great help and would be greatly appreciated. Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: LyX and DocBook: Permission to include parts of LyX Documentation

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Karakas
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.03.05 16:41:25: > > Chris Karakas wrote: > > > Am I allowed to do it? > > Yes, so long as your licence is compatible with the GPL. Thanks for answering! GPL you say? Now if only someone could assure me that the st

Re: LyX and DocBook: Permission to include parts of LyX Documentation

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Karakas
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.03.05 19:05:33: > > Chris Karakas wrote: > > > > Now the LyX User's Guide does NOT contain the Disclaimer > > This can be added. Use a comment environment or a note inset (depending on > your version of LyX

Re: [Patch] SnippetConversion for previews and DocBook

2005-02-13 Thread Chris Karakas
it into my lyxtox package. I am just saying it here, so we don't forget it on the way. ;-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [Patch] SnippetConversion for previews and DocBook

2005-02-13 Thread Chris Karakas
on > should I use? > This is another presentation property which needs to be decided upon > when the > document is exported :-( > Let the user enter it in a configuration dialog. A sensible default is 100. But others may use 72, AFAIR it depends on (or it *is*) the dpi of the display you used to create your images/screenshots. YMMV, that's why it belongs to a user-entered field. Note: there is another resolution-related parameter that belongs to jadetex.cfg, which I discovered lately. It also affects images in PDF... I will have to incoprporate it into my lyxtox package. I am just saying it here, so we don't forget it on the way. ;-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [Patch] SnippetConversion for previews and DocBook

2005-02-12 Thread Chris Karakas
Ciao. Ciao. /Andreas José Abílio Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [Patch] SnippetConversion for previews and DocBook

2005-02-12 Thread Chris Karakas
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.02.05 18:00:31: Am Samstag, 12. Februar 2005 15:29 schrieb Chris Karakas: And please do us a favor: Wrap your lines after 76 characters or so, otherwise quoted text looks as ugly as in this mail. Is it not wrapped? I didn't know it. However, I

Re: [Patch] SnippetConversion for previews and DocBook

2005-02-12 Thread Chris Karakas
e for docbook 5.0 to be release > > > without a dtd? More and more xml is becoming the default. > > What for? Where's the point? With DocBook SGML, we already have a procedure, and we know it works. SGML needs a DTD, so our working procedure needs it too. Everything else is "furure music", as Germans say. ;-) We (the users) need a working procedure, now - well, actually yesterday! ;-) > > > Ciao > > Ciao. > Ciao. > > /Andreas > > José Abílio > Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [Patch] SnippetConversion for previews and DocBook

2005-02-12 Thread Chris Karakas
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 12.02.05 18:00:31: > > Am Samstag, 12. Februar 2005 15:29 schrieb Chris Karakas: > > And please do us a favor: Wrap your lines after 76 characters or so, > otherwise quoted text looks as ugly as in this mail. > Is it no

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-21 Thread Chris Karakas
strings, so that my webmail does not interprete them as real entities and filters them out. But I am sure you understand what I meant. ;-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: name characters in xml.

2004-10-21 Thread Chris Karakas
, URL texts etc. should stay in english? PS. That's no accusation. I am just trying to understand what will be possible and what not with the current state of affairs in LyX 1.4.0. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-21 Thread Chris Karakas
abels and texts, how are you going to know that a "&" is a real "&" and not part of an "entity delimiter", as in "& lt ;"? You will end up trying to emulate an SGML parser, which is really not LyX' job. Note: I have inserted blanks in my strings, so that my webmail does not interprete them as real entities and filters them out. But I am sure you understand what I meant. ;-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: name characters in xml.

2004-10-21 Thread Chris Karakas
hinese. What shall I tell them? That labels, URL texts etc. should stay in english? PS. That's no accusation. I am just trying to understand what will be possible and what not with the current state of affairs in LyX 1.4.0. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-20 Thread Chris Karakas
and that the user can change it by using the graphical layout editor. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-20 Thread Chris Karakas
format 2. Document settings 3. none (edit .layout file manually) 4. .layout file editor It's O.K., we have a deal. ;-) Of course you may leave the layout editor for later (but I hope not for never to be done). -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-20 Thread Chris Karakas
uld rather tweak some option in a graphical dialog. Then, for every change that is done by LyX (in labels, names, whatever), add a Warning that says what LyX did and that the user can change it by using the graphical layout editor. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-20 Thread Chris Karakas
uld define a "nonmangled" > Docbook format > 2. Document settings > 3. none (edit .layout file manually) > 4. .layout file editor > It's O.K., we have a deal. ;-) Of course you may leave the layout editor for later (but I hope not for "never to be done"). -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.10.04 22:30:09: Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I suggest to leave validation to validating parsers, or, if you want to validate, then use an external one, Unfortunately it's not about validating but about producing parsable DocBook

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
into account the user's choices) decide this. Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
is the way it was! Labels have changed and so have the filenames too! And why all this? Because LyX thinks it must correct my labels and impose his view of correctness on my names. This can't be the right thing. Leave it to the SGML parser. The parser will complain - if it has to. -- Regards Chris

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
dependencies 5.) BMP files for RTF export 6.) Bitmap files for Web export 7.) other converters But I'm sure there are other opinions. That's O.K. with me. As long as I have the options, I can live fine with that. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 13:32:21: On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote: - Somebody in the DocBook committee decided that underscore is out. First I understand your point, second the problem is precisely the opposite

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
is acceptable for me. But please don't make the setting enforce standard SGML/XML ids the default one! ;-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
, for the moment. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
.layout file to include CNAME=.:_ that would be the default for the second input field. I disagree on the default. ;-) But other than that, the solution looks perfect to me. I can survive that default, so you have green light to implement it. :-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
to do the parser's job, so nobody should be impressed that it is going to need some parser's options in its dialogs. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.10.04 22:30:09: > > Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I suggest to leave validation to validating parsers, or, > if you want to validate, then use an external one, > > Unfortunately it's not

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
t is a question of producing legal code, we use the > same trick for latex, for identical reasons. > Let the user's SGML parser (who will take into account the user's choices) decide this. Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
ill complain - if it has to. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
es to produce PS without Ghostscript dependencies > 5.) BMP files for RTF export > 6.) Bitmap files for Web export > 7.) other converters > > But I'm sure there are other opinions. That's O.K. with me. As long as I have the options, I can live fine with that. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 13:32:21: > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote: > > > > - Somebody in the DocBook committee decided that underscore is "out". > > First I understand you

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
ndard label, so I never minded that "sec:blabla" is illegal. Your solution is acceptable for me. But please don't make the setting "enforce standard SGML/XML ids" the default one! ;-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
, if I would not have to tweak cryptic files, but could insert my special characters in some dialog. But I can live with the file solution too, for the moment. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
looks perfect to me. I can survive that default, so you have green light to implement it. :-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-19 Thread Chris Karakas
tions belong to LyX dialogs? But then, why should LyX mess up with DocBook options through its ID mangling? As I see it, it is LyX which is trying to "do the parser's job", so nobody should be impressed that it is going to need some "parser's options" in its dialogs. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: problem with XFig figures under PDF

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
/26/msg00053.html -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
the job. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.10.04 18:24:31: Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Note that for PDF output via SGML and pdfjadetex, you need an EPS file with the .pdf ending! You are kidding, don't you mean epdf ?? Sorry, sorry...I am recovering from a party

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
$y convert $y.png $y.bmp done which uses addd and convert to produce all versions of images files with the ending $1 (the first parameter to the script). -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
to reinvent the wheel. SGML can be quite tricky at this - and that was a reason that led to XML, namely that parsing SGML can be a challenge to program. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: problem with XFig figures under PDF

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
karakas-online.de/mySGML/explain-figures.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/26/msg00053.html -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
e sensible, default scripts that do the job. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.10.04 18:24:31: > > Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Note that for PDF output via SGML and pdfjadetex, > > you need an EPS file with the .pdf ending! > > You are kidding, don't you mean epd

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
mats"), maybe through a radio-button dialog in the preferences. LyX could then run some script like #! /bin/sh for x in `ls *.$1`; do y=`basename $x .$1` convert $y.$1 $y.png addd $y convert $y.png $y.bmp done which uses addd and convert to produce all versions of images files with the ending $1 (the first parameter to the script). -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: [PATCH] Docbook export math/graphic/refs

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Karakas
allowed in value of attribute ID http://www.karakas-online.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=872 I suggest to leave validation to validating parsers, or, if you want to validate, then use an external one, don't try to reinvent the wheel. SGML can be quite tricky at this - and that was a reason that led to XML, namely that parsing SGML can be a challenge to program. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: Bugs in docbook support.

2004-08-18 Thread Chris Karakas
knowleadge of the document strucutre. Not sure what you mean here (where will you add the hints?), but it looks like a good idea anyway. :-) I will look into bugzilla probably tomorrow. Please note that I will be in vacation in September. Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas

Re: Documentation of the lyx file format

2004-08-18 Thread Chris Karakas
it to export to SGML (DocBook), then use Openjade to convert to TeX and from there hopefully tex2lyx will take care... Didn't test it though. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: Bugs in docbook support.

2004-08-18 Thread Chris Karakas
the forms of comments so that the lyxtox > script gets smaller and takes advantage of lyx knowleadge of the document > strucutre. > Not sure what you mean here (where will you add the hints?), but it looks like a good idea anyway. :-) I will look into bugzilla probably tomorrow. Pleas

Re: Documentation of the lyx file format

2004-08-18 Thread Chris Karakas
around $3,000... :-D ). Maybe you could use it to export to SGML (DocBook), then use Openjade to convert to TeX and from there hopefully tex2lyx will take care... Didn't test it though. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between equation and inlineequation

2004-07-08 Thread Chris Karakas
Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 06.07.04 20:11:51: On Sunday 04 July 2004 14:47, Chris Karakas wrote: ... I use the sgmltools variant and I get that effect - i.e. all 's become their entities, even if they are at the start of an entity... I am starting to suspect sgmltools

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between "equation" and "inlineequation"

2004-07-08 Thread Chris Karakas
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 06.07.04 20:11:51: > > On Sunday 04 July 2004 14:47, Chris Karakas wrote: > ... > > I use the sgmltools variant and I get that effect - i.e. all &'s become > > their entities, even if they are at the st

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between equation and inlineequation

2004-07-04 Thread Chris Karakas
Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.07.04 17:29:41: On Friday 02 July 2004 15:59, Chris Karakas wrote: Regarding the , I have a problem (unrelated to math and equations): if I leave it as amp ; in the SGML text, it becomes amp ; amp ; (being displayed as amp ; in the browser

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between "equation" and "inlineequation"

2004-07-04 Thread Chris Karakas
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.07.04 17:29:41: > > On Friday 02 July 2004 15:59, Chris Karakas wrote: > > > > Regarding the &, I have a problem (unrelated to math and equations): if I > > leave it as "& amp ;" in the

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between equation and inlineequation

2004-07-02 Thread Chris Karakas
for the SGML/XML exported document? That is, can you offer the possibility to misuse a (referable) element like example with example role=theorem id=thm-5.3-15? Or is there a better way to handle this? Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between "equation" and "inlineequation"

2004-07-02 Thread Chris Karakas
ssible. How do I get this with LyX and DocBook? Can you offer such functionality for the SGML/XML exported document? That is, can you offer the possibility to "misuse" a (referable) element like "example" with "< example role="theorem" id="thm-5.3-15">"? Or is there a better way to handle this? Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between equation and inlineequation

2004-06-25 Thread Chris Karakas
Jose' Matos wrote: On Wednesday 19 May 2004 02:30, Chris Karakas wrote: Hello Jose', regarding the CDATA or not CDATA inside equations if I try to insert an inequality inside the equation the docbook output is: ... alt \[ E mc^{2} \] / alt ... without the CDATA jade

Re: Underscores in import LaTex

2004-06-25 Thread Chris Karakas
in http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - must distinguish between "equation" and "inlineequation"

2004-06-25 Thread Chris Karakas
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 19 May 2004 02:30, Chris Karakas wrote: > Hello Jose', > > regarding the CDATA or not CDATA inside equations if I try to insert an > inequality inside the equation the docbook output is: > ... > < alt >\[ > E< mc^{2} \] &g

Re: Underscores in import LaTex

2004-06-25 Thread Chris Karakas
es under LyX, check my method described in http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook export - what is the status?

2004-06-17 Thread Chris Karakas
=860 (Jose, I'm also waiting for your answer in that thread too ;-) ). Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook export - what is the status?

2004-06-17 Thread Chris Karakas
xt in my list: http://www.karakas-online.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=860 (Jose, I'm also waiting for your answer in that thread too ;-) ). Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - substitute programlisting with screen

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Karakas
... .lyx-1.4.0cvs and so on. Is your .lyx then a symlink to the right directory? -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - substitute programlisting with screen

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Karakas
-- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Karakas
sions at the same time I > have .lyx-1.3... .lyx-1.4.0cvs and so on. > Is your .lyx then a symlink to the right directory? > -- > José Abílio > > LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-) -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Karakas
e a problem of 1.2.0...I'll have to check with a test system - may take some time till I set it up. Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - IDs should not be in anchors, but in the elements

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
there. ;-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook Export - substitute programlisting with screen

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
to choose which one of the two tags should be used for the LyX Code environment when it is exported to DocBook: programlisting, or screen. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook Export - tgroup should not be enclosed in para

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook Export - must distinguish between equation and inlineequation

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
). -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - IDs should not be in anchors, but in the elements

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
a new problem then. See you there. ;-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
be used for the LyX "Code" environment when it is exported to DocBook: programlisting, or screen. -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook Export - "tgroup" should not be enclosed in "para"

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
, it is nevertheles wrong to output a before . I propose to delete the elements that enclose a inside a . -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

DocBook Export - must distinguish between "equation" and "inlineequation"

2004-05-18 Thread Chris Karakas
www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/awkscr_math, see also http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/magic-behind-the-math.html ), or give the user full control on every equation about how it should be exported to DocBook (with or without title, and which one). -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - IDs should not be in anchors, but in the elements

2004-05-17 Thread Chris Karakas
goes for the other elements accordingly. I think that's enough work for the moment. ;-) Thank you very much for your efforts José - we are building a fantastic application here! Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - IDs should not be in anchors, but in the elements

2004-05-17 Thread Chris Karakas
in that thread too. ;-) Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - IDs should not be in anchors, but in the elements

2004-05-17 Thread Chris Karakas
-- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

Re: DocBook Export - IDs should not be in anchors, but in the elements

2004-05-17 Thread Chris Karakas
Some table title ... The same goes for the other elements accordingly. I think that's enough work for the moment. ;-) Thank you very much for your efforts José - we are building a fantastic application here! Chris -- Regards Chris Karakas http://www.karakas-online.de

  1   2   >