Vincent?
Yes, it's on the radar.
The fix is ok, it's exactly the same as the way we fixed it for
lyxvc().file_found_hook.
Now I started wondering what we should do if we load an emergency save
and it appears that the original file is read-only. Then we don't want
to make the loaded
Am 18.11.2010 um 12:43 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Vincent?
Yes, it's on the radar.
The fix is ok, it's exactly the same as the way we fixed it for
lyxvc().file_found_hook.
Now I started wondering what we should do if we load an emergency save
and it appears that the
Stephan Witt wrote:
The situation you describe is not impossible. But it should not happen
by LyX - only with external tools. E. g. rcs checkin with command line
after the emergency save or restore from some backup.
on the other hand when somebody starts to externally play with our files
he
Am 18.11.2010 um 13:19 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
The situation you describe is not impossible. But it should not happen
by LyX - only with external tools. E. g. rcs checkin with command line
after the emergency save or restore from some backup.
on the other hand when
>
> Vincent?
>
Yes, it's on the radar.
The fix is ok, it's exactly the same as the way we fixed it for
lyxvc().file_found_hook.
Now I started wondering what we should do if we load an emergency save
and it appears that the original file is read-only. Then we don't want
to make the loaded
Am 18.11.2010 um 12:43 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>>
>> Vincent?
>>
>
>
> Yes, it's on the radar.
>
> The fix is ok, it's exactly the same as the way we fixed it for
> lyxvc().file_found_hook.
>
> Now I started wondering what we should do if we load an emergency save
> and it appears
Stephan Witt wrote:
> The situation you describe is not impossible. But it should not happen
> by LyX - only with external tools. E. g. rcs checkin with command line
> after the emergency save or restore from some backup.
on the other hand when somebody starts to externally play with our files
he
Am 18.11.2010 um 13:19 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> The situation you describe is not impossible. But it should not happen
>> by LyX - only with external tools. E. g. rcs checkin with command line
>> after the emergency save or restore from some backup.
>
> on the other hand
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
1.6.6
Are you sure?
The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the error is
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
> > > Stephan Witt wrote:
> > it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
> > >>>
> > >>> 1.6.6
> > >>
> > >> Are you sure?
> > >> The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
> > >
> > > sorry, i meant the
Am 15.11.2010 um 13:42 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker:
#7035: version tracking fails with error in running RCS ci
-+--
Reporter: kuhn | Owner: nob...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Stephan Witt wrote:
it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
1.6.6
Are you sure?
The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the error is from 2.0.0 of course
pavel
Am 15.11.2010 um 14:00 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
1.6.6
Are you sure?
The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the error is from 2.0.0 of
Stephan Witt wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
1.6.6
Are you sure?
The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the error is from 2.0.0 of course
Ok, it
Am 15.11.2010 um 13:42 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker:
> #7035: version tracking fails with error in running RCS ci
> -+--
> Reporter: kuhn | Owner: nob...@…
> Type: defect |
Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
> >
> > 1.6.6
>
> Are you sure?
> The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the error is from 2.0.0 of course
pavel
Am 15.11.2010 um 14:00 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
>>>
>>> 1.6.6
>>
>> Are you sure?
>> The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
>
> sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> it's not clear which LyX version was used by the ticket creator kuhn
> >>>
> >>> 1.6.6
> >>
> >> Are you sure?
> >> The LyX-version in ticket is 2.0.0svn... (is it the default?)
> >
> > sorry, i meant the file is done in 1.6.6. the error is
18 matches
Mail list logo
