Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 25-9-2012 10:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 25-9-2012 10:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Just get used to a more advanced form of

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: | Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

On 09/25/2012 04:24 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Related question: are there reasons to use plain git pull, or should I always add --rebase ? As Lars said, sometimes you want to pull, but for the kind of stuff I do, mostly not. So I've done: git config --global alias.up pull

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Just get used to a more advanced form of

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: | Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : >> Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: >>> That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it >>> looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

On 09/25/2012 04:24 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Related question: are there reasons to use plain "git pull", or should I always add --rebase ? As Lars said, sometimes you want to pull, but for the kind of stuff I do, mostly not. So I've done: git config --global alias.up "pull

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Le 24/09/2012 16:19, Stephan Witt a écrit : commit 8169347adafeaece14c8b463add8072c6e9a91a8 Author: Stephan Witt sw...@lyx.org Date: Sun Sep 23

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

On 09/24/2012 10:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Finally is it expected that the commits show in only one e-mail message? Is there a reason to do that instead of two e-mails? It's mostly a matter of re-writing (or somehow updating) the email-sending script to do this. I've not had time.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Just get used to a more advanced form of communication. It is Stephan's code, which you committed.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Le 24/09/2012 16:19, Stephan Witt a écrit : commit 8169347adafeaece14c8b463add8072c6e9a91a8 Author: Stephan Witt Date: Sun Sep 23

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

On 09/24/2012 10:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Finally is it expected that the commits show in only one e-mail message? Is there a reason to do that instead of two e-mails? It's mostly a matter of re-writing (or somehow updating) the email-sending script to do this. I've not had time.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Just get used to a more advanced form of communication. It is Stephan's code, which you committed.