[Updated PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-19 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait.

[Updated PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-19 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait.

Re: [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-18 Thread Richard Heck
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait. Maybe

Re: [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-18 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe

Re: [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-18 Thread Richard Heck
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait. Maybe

Re: [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-18 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe

[PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-16 Thread Richard Heck
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait. What I've done is add an optional argument to

Re: [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-16 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait. Maybe yes. What I've done

[PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-16 Thread Richard Heck
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait. What I've done is add an optional argument to

Re: [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again

2007-06-16 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code, but maybe that could wait. Maybe yes. What I've done