On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on, word-left'
combo should have done as
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:38:59AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
I am more concerned about implementation. Not having a 'native'
LFUN_WORD_LEFT_SELECT does not mean we can't have an
'word-left-select' 'alias'.
I was actually trying to agree with you... ;-)
That's notoriously hard.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > > Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
> > > > and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on, word-left'
> > > > combo should
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > > > Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
> > > > > and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:38:59AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I am more concerned about implementation. Not having a 'native'
> > LFUN_WORD_LEFT_SELECT does not mean we can't have an
> > 'word-left-select' 'alias'.
> >
> I was actually trying to agree with you... ;-)
That's
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
?
Andre Poenitz wrote:
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Andre'
As I understand it set() and mark() are equivalent in a cut, copy,
paste sense (same data is placed in the selection buffer.) However,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:53:54AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Andre'
As I understand it set() and mark() are equivalent in a cut,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Don't worry about it, it's a flag that says that the anchor should not be
cleaned. It's for an alternative selection method: you set the flag on and
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:53:54AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Andre'
As I understand it
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:55:33PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Don't worry about it, it's a flag that says that the anchor should not be
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Is anybody out there using this method?
Not me.
Well, it's different from what mathed does, so it might be an obstacle
for IU.
It's not different, it's an aditional (different) feature. I don't think it
would be difficult to add it to mathed.
Alfredo
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think you can think of hte mark as a place anchor here
Emacs has a very nice selection mode (C-space), if possible we
should have that as well. (after C-space is pressed I can used any
cursorm movement command and the
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:55:33PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Don't worry about it, it's a flag
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:03:44PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Certainly. It is one of the nicest way of selecting after all... (with
keyboard only.)
Ok, now that I know that this is C-V in vim I recognize that I am using
this all the time myself.
Was was, however not aware that this
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on,
word-left' combo should have done as well...
Then cull the redundant one.
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote:
I think you can think of hte mark as a place anchor here
Emacs has a very nice selection mode (C-space), if possible we
should have that as well. (after C-space is pressed I can used any
cursorm
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.)
'word-left' and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some
'selection-on, word-left' combo should have done as well...
| Then cull the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:14:21PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think you can think of hte mark as a place anchor here
Emacs has a very nice selection mode (C-space), if possible we
should
Nothing fancy.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
? 1.diff
? 2.diff
? 3.diff
? fullredraw.diff
? par-row.diff
? qfont_loader.tar.bz2
? search.diff
?
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on, word-left'
combo should have done as well...
It saves some typing in command sequences.
But that how the
this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
(and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
?
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
> (and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
>
> Andre'
>
As I understand it set() and mark() are equivalent in a cut, copy,
paste sense (same data is placed in the selection buffer.)
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:53:54AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >
> > this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
> > (and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
> >
> > Andre'
> >
>
> As I understand it set() and mark() are
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
> (and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
Don't worry about it, it's a flag that says that the anchor should not be
cleaned. It's for an alternative selection method: you set the flag on and
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:53:54AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
>> > (and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
>> >
>> > Andre'
>> >
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:55:33PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
> > (and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
>
> Don't worry about it, it's a flag that says that the anchor should
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is anybody out there using this method?
Not me.
> Well, it's different from what mathed does, so it might be an obstacle
> for IU.
It's not different, it's an aditional (different) feature. I don't think it
would be difficult to add it to mathed.
Alfredo
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think you can think of hte mark as a "place anchor here"
>
> Emacs has a very nice "selection mode" (C-), if possible we
> should have that as well. (after C- is pressed I can used any
> cursorm movement command and the
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:55:33PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>> > this moves the Selection struct from LyXText to BufferView
>> > (and I have still no clue what this 'mark' flag is good for...)
>>
>> Don't worry about
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:03:44PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Certainly. It is one of the nicest way of selecting after all... (with
> keyboard only.)
Ok, now that I know that this is C-V in vim I recognize that I am using
this all the time myself.
Was was, however not aware that this
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
> and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on,
> word-left' combo should have done as well...
Then cull the redundant one.
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
>> I think you can think of hte mark as a "place anchor here"
>>
>> Emacs has a very nice "selection mode" (C-), if possible we
>> should have that as well. (after C- is pressed I can used any
>> cursorm
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.)
>>> 'word-left' and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some
>>> 'selection-on, word-left' combo should have done as well...
>>
> | Then
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:14:21PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> I think you can think of hte mark as a "place anchor here"
> >>
> >> Emacs has a very nice "selection mode" (C-), if possible
Nothing fancy.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
? 1.diff
? 2.diff
? 3.diff
? fullredraw.diff
? par-row.diff
? qfont_loader.tar.bz2
? search.diff
?
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left'
> > > and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on, word-left'
> > > combo should have done as well...
> >
It saves some typing in command sequences.
> > But that
38 matches
Mail list logo