Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On 2015-11-16, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-11-12, Georg Baum wrote: Just one point for today: The automatic font package selection (fontenc vs. fontspec) would be similar to the automatic language package selection (babel vs. polyglossia). >>> Almost: No

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-11-12, Georg Baum wrote: > >> (and the most important reason for me personally is that you can set an >> explicit default format per document: an automatic choice of non-TeX >> would eliminate uncompilable documents if such a default format is >> set). > > This is

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On 2015-11-12, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> The current GUI design is inconsistent if you want to export to the most >> common document types: >> 1. DVI TeX fonts for the TeX nostalgic >> 2. PS TeX fonts for fast preview/printing and PS-tricks

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I have not followed the #9744 discussion closely or looked at Georg's > recent work, so my following suggestion might be irrelevant now, but in > any case: > > Would it make sense to check the box "Use non-TeX fonts" by > default, and then change the full string from >

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Guenter Milde wrote: > The current GUI design is inconsistent if you want to export to the most > commen document types: > > 1. DVI TeX fonts for the TeX nostalgic > > 2. PS TeX fonts for fast preview/printing and PS-tricks > > 3. PDF (pdflatex) TeX fonts

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:35:31PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I have not followed the #9744 discussion closely or looked at Georg's > > recent work, so my following suggestion might be irrelevant now, but in > > any case: > > > > Would it make sense to check the box

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Dear Georg, On 2015-11-08, Georg Baum wrote: Thanks for the patch with parallel config values for tex and non-tex fonts. > The next step for the tests would then be to explicitly set sensible non-TeX > fonts for those files of our documentation that have special requirements, > so that we can

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:17:36PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > I want to be able to prepare a document that works with many output > formats (one source fits all). One more use-case: template > documents with sensible settings for the various export formats. +1 > However, the most problematic

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:40:09AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015 um 14:57:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> > >> I have just a few more items on my checklist (thanks to Vincent for the > >> help) before releasing alpha. I

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you > and Günter decide is fine with me since you two seem to be the only ones > that understand what should happen. As far as the tests, I don't have a > strong preference. I think we should try to get

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you > > and Günter decide is fine with me since you two seem to be the only ones > > that understand what should happen. As far as the

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015 um 14:57:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you > > > and Günter decide is fine with me

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015 um 14:57:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this, Georg. As

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On 11/08/2015 02:34 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you and Günter decide is fine with me since you two seem to be the only ones that understand what should happen. As far as the tests, I don't have a strong

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On 11/08/2015 02:57 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you and Günter decide is fine with me since you two seem to be the only ones that understand

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On 11/08/2015 02:34 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you and Günter decide is fine with me since you two seem to be the only ones that understand what should happen. As far as the tests, I don't have a strong

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Richard Heck wrote: > Very minor suggestion: > > +def convert_fontsettings(document): > +" Duplicate font settings " > + > +i = find_token(document.header, "\\use_non_tex_fonts ", 0) > +if i == -1: > +document.warning("Malformed LyX document: No > \\use_non_tex_fonts!") > +

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015 um 14:57:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> >> I have just a few more items on my checklist (thanks to Vincent for the >> help) before releasing alpha. I am also waiting for access to the FTP >> (my IP needs to be whitelisted).

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Dear Georg, dear all, On 2015-11-05, Georg Baum wrote: > I started to work on bug 9744 in order tor get better test results, as > discussed. Attached is a proof of concept for the automatic font selection. Thanks for your work and thanks for the patch. For the Document>Settings>Fonts GUI, I

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 21:04:03, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:12:56PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > > The test problem could easily be solved in the test machinery instead: When > > exporting via XeTeX or LuaTeX, switch to non-TeX fonts,

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear Georg, dear all, > > On 2015-11-05, Georg Baum wrote: > >> I started to work on bug 9744 in order tor get better test results, as >> discussed. Attached is a proof of concept for the automatic font >> selection. > > Thanks for your work and thanks for the patch. >

[patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

Dear all, I started to work on bug 9744 in order tor get better test results, as discussed. Attached is a proof of concept for the automatic font selection. The GUI logic is partly wrong, and the fonts are not yet stored independently, but apart from that it should work. However, while

Re: [patch] proof of concept for bug 9744: allow parallel configuration of TeX and non-TeX fonts

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:12:56PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > The test problem could easily be solved in the test machinery instead: When > exporting via XeTeX or LuaTeX, switch to non-TeX fonts, even if the document > has a different setting. Unless someone presents a convincing use case for