On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> For me it is OK as it is now.
>
> -1 to revert.
As Kornel I prefer the way it is now (except there might be some buggy corner
cases
as you write in other mail, but in general I'm not confused by the current
situation
and find nice
On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 14.33.49 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Note that shift-tab for depth does not always have a local scope either,
> since it may change the depth of nested sub elements.
Yes, I know and it was a sloppy language. :-)
A better expression would be a waterfall model and
On 01/02/2022 11:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for feedback about
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
sectioning layout.
Do you find that this is confusing? The fact is that these two bindings
Le 01/02/2022 à 15:27, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
I was surprised by it. I was expecting for Tab to have a local scope. It was
surprising to me that it affected all the sections at the same level below
that paragraph. I was expecting a behavior similar to what it happens for
lists and
On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 10.23.41 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for feedback about
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
>
> Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
> sectioning layout.
>
> Do you find that this is confusing? The
Am Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:23:41 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for feedback about
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
>
> Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
> sectioning layout.
>
> Do you find that this is confusing? The
Hello,
I am looking for feedback about
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
sectioning layout.
Do you find that this is confusing? The fact is that these two bindings
have different behavior on layouts that follow the
