Re: Redundant \cmidrule commands in formal tables

2020-09-18 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 18/09/2020 11:33 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Freitag, den 18.09.2020, 22:50 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: I've attached a mwe. I created a 2 row, 3 column table, changed to Formal Style, cleared the internal rules (leaving top and bottom rules), then joined the 2nd and 3rd cells of the

Re: Redundant \cmidrule commands in formal tables

2020-09-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2020, 22:50 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > I've attached a mwe. I created a 2 row, 3 column table, changed to > Formal Style, cleared the internal rules (leaving top and bottom > rules), then joined the 2nd and 3rd cells of the top row using the > button on the table

Re: Redundant \cmidrule commands in formal tables

2020-09-18 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 18/09/2020 6:39 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Freitag, den 18.09.2020, 17:53 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: I notice when creating a title for a number of columns in a formal table that the \cmidrule command is needlessly duplicated: \begin{tabular}{c} \toprule &

Re: Redundant \cmidrule commands in formal tables

2020-09-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2020, 17:53 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > I notice when creating a title for a number of columns in a formal > table > that the \cmidrule command is needlessly duplicated: > > \begin{tabular}{c} > \toprule > & \multicolumn{4}{c}{title}\tabularnewline >

Re: Redundant \cmidrule commands in formal tables

2020-09-18 Thread Andrew Parsloe
ed that this is with 2.3.5.2 on windows 10. I notice that some work has been done on formal tables for LyX 2.4. Perhaps it has already been fixed? Andrew -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Redundant \cmidrule commands in formal tables

2020-09-17 Thread Andrew Parsloe
I notice when creating a title for a number of columns in a formal table that the \cmidrule command is needlessly duplicated: \begin{tabular}{c} \toprule  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{title}\tabularnewline \cmidrule{2-5} \cmidrule{3-5} \cmidrule{4-5} \cmidrule{5-5} x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4\tabularnewline

Re: Formal tables

2017-03-29 Thread Andrew Parsloe
#6011, although none of the bugs collected there are about formal tables. It is not clear to me how to add the four that Joel mentions to the Description in the ticket. What is the magic button to click? Is it the Reply button to the right of the Description field? The Preview suggests not. Andrew

Re: Formal tables

2017-03-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/29/2017 04:22 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 29/03/2017 1:04 p.m., Joel Kulesza wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Parsloe > > wrote: >> >> The booktabs package produces much cleaner tables than "native" >>

Re: Formal tables

2017-03-29 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 29/03/2017 1:04 p.m., Joel Kulesza wrote: On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Parsloe > wrote: The booktabs package produces much cleaner tables than "native" LaTeX ones, but I wonder why LyX only "half converts" a LaTeX

Re: Formal tables

2017-03-28 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > The booktabs package produces much cleaner tables than "native" LaTeX > ones, but I wonder why LyX only "half converts" a LaTeX table to formal > style? In the attachment LyX produces the middle table from the

Formal tables

2017-03-28 Thread Andrew Parsloe
The booktabs package produces much cleaner tables than "native" LaTeX ones, but I wonder why LyX only "half converts" a LaTeX table to formal style? In the attachment LyX produces the middle table from the left-hand one, but the right-hand one is what should be produced according to the