Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Daniel
On 2020-04-11 19:13, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 6:49 AM, Daniel wrote: In summary: - PrettyFormat should be extended to be able use the counter directly as is LabelString. - Ref should be customizable similarly as well. Can you add bug reports for these? They should both be quite

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/04/2020 à 19:03, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : On 4/11/20 6:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 11/04/2020 à 12:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Daniel: That's pretty similar to the breaking labels, I guess. That seems pretty simple

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/10/20 6:49 AM, Daniel wrote: > In summary: > - PrettyFormat should be extended to be able use the counter directly > as is LabelString. > - Ref should be customizable similarly as well. Can you add bug reports for these? They should both be quite easy to fix. I have no idea, actually, why I

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/11/20 6:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/04/2020 à 12:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : >> Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Daniel: >>> That's pretty similar to the breaking labels, I guess. That seems >>> pretty simple idea wise. Didn't expect the implementation to be

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/04/2020 à 12:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Daniel: That's pretty similar to the breaking labels, I guess. That seems pretty simple idea wise. Didn't expect the implementation to be so tricky for those. It looks easy on paper, as many

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > That's pretty similar to the breaking labels, I guess. That seems > pretty simple idea wise. Didn't expect the implementation to be so > tricky for those. It looks easy on paper, as many things. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Daniel
On 2020-04-11 10:34, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: The more important case are not collapsible insets but inline insets (such as character styles) that don't have a button but should integrate with the surrounding text. The hard part is to get the metrics and drawing right. That's pretty similar

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 09:32 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Here is another rough idea for improvement of insets whose content is > not supposed to float in the text, such as footnotes. Leave the label > floating in the normal text line and open the inset below: The more important case are not

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-11 Thread racoon
On 2020-04-10 22:02, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 2:55 PM, racoon wrote: On 2020-04-10 20:29, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 1:58 PM, Daniel wrote: On 10/4/20 19:54, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote: On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote:

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/10/20 2:55 PM, racoon wrote: > On 2020-04-10 20:29, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 4/10/20 1:58 PM, Daniel wrote: >>> On 10/4/20 19:54, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote: >> Attached is a simple concept of what

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread racoon
On 2020-04-10 20:29, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 1:58 PM, Daniel wrote: On 10/4/20 19:54, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote: On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote: Attached is a simple concept of what it could look like. Daniel I think this fancy

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/10/20 1:58 PM, Daniel wrote: > On 10/4/20 19:54, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 4/10/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote: >>> On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote: Attached is a simple concept of what it could look like. Daniel >>> >>> I think this fancy zig-zag is not important.

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Daniel
On 10/4/20 19:54, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/10/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote: On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote: Attached is a simple concept of what it could look like. Daniel I think this fancy zig-zag is not important. The label could just break at a space with a straight cut. This

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/10/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote: >> Attached is a simple concept of what it could look like. >> >> Daniel >> > > I think this fancy zig-zag is not important. The label could just > break at a space with a straight cut. This is how it currently works > in both

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Daniel
On 2020-04-10 11:00, Daniel wrote: On 2020-04-09 23:55, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/8/20 8:05 AM, Daniel wrote: Ideally, these "labels" would be customizable so that the content label string can be customized in the same way as label strings and counters (as in "section \thesection" and

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Daniel
On 2020-04-09 11:27, Daniel wrote: Attached is a simple concept of what it could look like. Daniel I think this fancy zig-zag is not important. The label could just break at a space with a straight cut. This is how it currently works in both Libre and Word. Seems good enough. Daniel --

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-10 Thread Daniel
On 2020-04-09 23:55, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 4/8/20 8:05 AM, Daniel wrote: Ideally, these "labels" would be customizable so that the content label string can be customized in the same way as label strings and counters (as in "section \thesection" and "(\roman{enumiii})"). Again some

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-09 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/8/20 8:05 AM, Daniel wrote: > Just a couple of rough ideas that I think would improve working with > cross-references. Maybe some of them are already worked on. I'd be > interested to know. > > I guess one of the advantages of LyX is that working with texts is > pretty nice even without

Re: Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-09 Thread Daniel
On 2020-04-08 14:05, Daniel wrote: The content-previews have already been (partly) implemented for LyXHTML. For example, a reference to the first numbered section shows "Section 1" (though currently this reference appears only in capitals rather than being responsive to the capitalization

Improvements for cross-referencing

2020-04-08 Thread Daniel
Just a couple of rough ideas that I think would improve working with cross-references. Maybe some of them are already worked on. I'd be interested to know. I guess one of the advantages of LyX is that working with texts is pretty nice even without generating a preview. Seeing versions of