Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars I think this should not be done for 1.4.0.
I suspect it won't work anyway.
Lars If we can find an _easy_ solution to the speed issues on Mac
Lars then that can be applied to 1.4.1, if only more complicated
Lars solutions are found
John Levon wrote:
I'll /try/ and find some time to investigate...
Maybe you'll also find some time to have a look at bug 1656, provided that you
understand QSession ;-)
The problems are elaborated in this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-develm=113293145118917w=2
Regards,
Jürgen
On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the right
direction: what information would be useful? How can I
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:34:05AM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I think this should not be done for 1.4.0.
I suspect it won't work anyway.
Lars> If we can find an _easy_ solution to the speed issues on Mac
Lars> then that can be applied to 1.4.1, if only more complicated
Lars> solutions
John Levon wrote:
> I'll /try/ and find some time to investigate...
Maybe you'll also find some time to have a look at bug 1656, provided that you
understand QSession ;-)
The problems are elaborated in this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel=113293145118917=2
Regards,
Jürgen
On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the right
direction: what information would be useful? How can I
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:34:05AM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
> >
> >>I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
> >>bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
Bennett bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the
Bennett right direction: what information would be useful? How can I
Bennett get it? ...
I really do not
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the right
direction: what information would be useful? How can I get it? ...
Bennett,
could you try the
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
|
| I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
| bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the right
| direction: what information would be useful? How
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
Bennett> bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the
Bennett> right direction: what information would be useful? How can I
Bennett> get it? ...
I
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
> I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
> bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the right
> direction: what information would be useful? How can I get it? ...
Bennett,
could you try the
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
|
| > I'm happy to do whatever I can to help figure out where the
| > bottleneck is on the Mac, but I'll need to be pointed in the right
| > direction: what information would be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars It is time to cut losses and get 1.4.0 out there what ever
| Lars annoys the translaters they have the option to skip translating.
|
| Sure. I do not think though that updating
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Sure it does... and this trigger updates of po files.
Updating the po files is the whole point of Michael's questions.
Lars And it moves focus away from bugs that _must_ be fixed.
We are getting there slowly.
| What delays it are
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Lars And it moves focus away from bugs that _must_ be fixed.
We are getting there slowly.
Indeed! Bugzilla:
http://tinyurl.com/7qacq
has only 8 bugs left... of
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| ...
| Lars And it moves focus away from bugs that _must_ be fixed.
|
| We are getting there slowly.
|
| Indeed!
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
I'd really like to see bug 1934 fixed... it's an image issue, it makes
us look ugly and old-fashioned.
I'll /try/ and find some time to investigate...
regards
john
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
|
| I'd really like to see bug 1934 fixed... it's an image issue, it makes
| us look ugly and old-fashioned.
Font issue I'd say?
|
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:17:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| I'd really like to see bug 1934 fixed... it's an image issue, it makes
| us look ugly and old-fashioned.
Font issue I'd say?
I mean image issue as in it's a bad impression users get
john
On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Should we aim at a Christmas pre-release?
One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
I've pushed pretty hard for this before, but I'd like to push again
before release: speed of LyX-1.4.0 on Mac OS X is not where it should
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Should we aim at a Christmas pre-release?
One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
I've pushed pretty hard for this before, but I'd like to push again
before
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> It is time to cut losses and get 1.4.0 out there what ever
| Lars> annoys the translaters they have the option to skip translating.
|
| Sure. I do not think though
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Sure it does... and this trigger updates of po files.
Updating the po files is the whole point of Michael's questions.
Lars> And it moves focus away from bugs that _must_ be fixed.
We are getting there slowly.
| What
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Lars> And it moves focus away from bugs that _must_ be fixed.
>
> We are getting there slowly.
Indeed! Bugzilla:
http://tinyurl.com/7qacq
has only 8
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| ...
| > Lars> And it moves focus away from bugs that _must_ be fixed.
| >
| > We are getting there slowly.
|
|
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
I'd really like to see bug 1934 fixed... it's an image issue, it makes
us look ugly and old-fashioned.
I'll /try/ and find some time to investigate...
regards
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
|
| I'd really like to see bug 1934 fixed... it's an image issue, it makes
| us look ugly and old-fashioned.
Font issue I'd say?
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:17:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | I'd really like to see bug 1934 fixed... it's an image issue, it makes
> | us look ugly and old-fashioned.
>
> Font issue I'd say?
I mean image issue as in "it's a bad impression users get"
john
On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Should we aim at a Christmas pre-release?
One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
I've pushed pretty hard for this before, but I'd like to push again
before release: speed of LyX-1.4.0 on Mac OS X is not where it should
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> >| Should we aim at a Christmas pre-release?
> >
> >One better I'd say: Christmas release candidate
>
> I've pushed pretty hard for this before, but I'd like to push again
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars It is time to cut losses and get 1.4.0 out there what ever
Lars annoys the translaters they have the option to skip translating.
Sure. I do not think though that updating the layout files delays
1.4.0. What delays it are the bugs
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> It is time to cut losses and get 1.4.0 out there what ever
Lars> annoys the translaters they have the option to skip translating.
Sure. I do not think though that updating the layout files delays
1.4.0. What delays it are
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
|
| Hello,
| I guess I am not the only translator fighting with the innumerable
| variants in the layout strings.
|
| Me, too (although I almost completed work)
|
| All the layout strings are currently marked as translatable,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael I think we should do something in order to resolve this issue
Michael BEFORE 1.4.0 is released. It is a real nuissance for all
Michael translators.
Michael What comes into my mind are two things:
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
|
| >> Hello,
| >> I guess I am not the only translator fighting with the innumerable
| >> variants in the layout strings.
| >
| > Me, too (although I almost completed work)
| >
| >> All the layout strings are currently marked as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I think we should do something in order to resolve this issue
Michael> BEFORE 1.4.0 is released. It is a real nuissance for all
Michael> translators.
Michael> What comes into my mind are two things:
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael I think we should do something in order to resolve this issue
Michael BEFORE 1.4.0 is released. It is a real nuissance for all
Michael translators.
Michael What comes into my mind are two things:
Michael 1. In ./po/Makefile.in.in, we
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I think we should do something in order to resolve this issue
Michael> BEFORE 1.4.0 is released. It is a real nuissance for all
Michael> translators.
Michael> What comes into my mind are two things:
Michael> 1. In
Michael Gerz wrote:
Hello,
I guess I am not the only translator fighting with the innumerable
variants in the layout strings.
Me, too (although I almost completed work)
All the layout strings are currently marked as translatable, and it
is up to the translator to decide if he should try to
Michael Gerz wrote:
Hello,
I guess I am not the only translator fighting with the innumerable
variants in the layout strings.
Me, too (although I almost completed work)
All the layout strings are currently marked as translatable, and it
is up to the translator to decide if he should try to
Hello,
I guess I am not the only translator fighting with the innumerable
variants in the layout strings.
All the layout strings are currently marked as translatable, and it is
up to the translator to decide if he should try to adapt them or not.
But, as I understand it from the manuals,
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 20:05, Georg Baum wrote:
This is very easy to do, but I think we should delay that after 1.4.0 is
out. AFAICS we have only two layouts that need to be merged: g-brief-de
and g-brief-en. Please put that in bugzilla once it is up again.
+1
Georg
--
José Abílio
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Please put that in bugzilla once it is up again.
Note that it _is_ up. Lars fixed it.
JMarc
Hello,
I guess I am not the only translator fighting with the innumerable
variants in the layout strings.
All the layout strings are currently marked as translatable, and it is
up to the translator to decide if he should try to adapt them or not.
But, as I understand it from the manuals,
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 20:05, Georg Baum wrote:
> This is very easy to do, but I think we should delay that after 1.4.0 is
> out. AFAICS we have only two layouts that need to be merged: g-brief-de
> and g-brief-en. Please put that in bugzilla once it is up again.
+1
> Georg
--
José
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Please put that in bugzilla once it is up again.
Note that it _is_ up. Lars fixed it.
JMarc
48 matches
Mail list logo
