On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:20:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Lyx Developers,
As per the request of Jean-Marc, I am sending this bug report that both
Edmar and I experienced. It concerns building the program code of
a literate program using Lyx. Here is our discussion of the
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
You should define a NoWeb-Program converter, when the converter field is
"noweb_build $$i", and the flags field is "originaldir,parselog=listerrors g",
and the noweb_build script should be something like
#!/bin/sh
cp $1 .
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:20:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Lyx Developers,
>
> As per the request of Jean-Marc, I am sending this bug report that both
> Edmar and I experienced. It concerns building the program code of
> a literate program using Lyx. Here is our discussion of
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> You should define a NoWeb->Program converter, when the converter field is
> "noweb_build $$i", and the flags field is "originaldir,parselog=listerrors g",
> and the noweb_build script should be something like
>
> #!/bin/sh
> cp $1
I've been extensively using the LyX/Literate combination for some time
and have never seen this behavior before.
Do you have a recipe for reproducing this?
---Kayvan
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:20:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Lyx Developers,
As per the
I've been extensively using the LyX/Literate combination for some time
and have never seen this behavior before.
Do you have a recipe for reproducing this?
---Kayvan
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:20:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Lyx Developers,
>
> As per
Hello Lyx Developers,
As per the request of Jean-Marc, I am sending this bug report that both
Edmar and I experienced. It concerns building the program code of
a literate program using Lyx. Here is our discussion of the bug:
Another anomality is that if the directory is clean, i.e., no
Hello Lyx Developers,
As per the request of Jean-Marc, I am sending this bug report that both
Edmar and I experienced. It concerns building the program code of
a literate program using Lyx. Here is our discussion of the bug:
> >> Another anomality is that if the directory is clean, i.e., no
Edmar Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX
Edmar a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here
Edmar at my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have
Edmar opportunity to use this feature.
Hi Edmar, nice to hear from you again.
Edmar Anyway... If
Edmar> Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX
Edmar> a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here
Edmar> at my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have
Edmar> opportunity to use this feature.
Hi Edmar, nice to hear from you again.
Edmar>
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX
Lars a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at
Lars my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have opportunity to
Lars use this feature. Then,
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX
Lars> a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at
Lars> my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have opportunity to
Lars> use this
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
To be able to run `cvs
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten
those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files
to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked their patch
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> > Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
> > the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
> > have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
> > To be able
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten
> > those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files
> > to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Allan Rae wrote:
So in summary:
If you have cvs access but no new files use
`cvs diff -p -N -u`
if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs
access but have added new files then get the modified diff and
Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
To be able to run `cvs add` you have to be given at least read-only
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > So in summary:
> > If you have cvs access but no new files use
> > `cvs diff -p -N -u`
> >
> > if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs
> > access but have added new files then get the
>
> Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
> the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
> have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
> To be able to run `cvs add` you have to be given at least
Hi Lars.
I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX a while back
(LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at my job shifted
and
it is a long time I don't have opportunity to use this feature.
Then, on July one guy sent me email saying it was broken. In fact
it
was, but it is
yucky-html-email
pMy question is how we submit patches nowadays. I couldn't find the
brfamiliar script to diff two source trees... (Yeah, it's being a long
brtime...)
/yucky-html-email
Makepatch doesn't exist anymore. Everyone is expected to use cvs to build
patches against the latest cvs not
Allan Rae wrote:
So in summary:
If you have cvs access but no new files use
`cvs diff -p -N -u`
if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs
access but have added new files then get the modified diff and a script
called packcvs from the above site and
Hi Lars.
I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX a while back
(LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at my job shifted
and
it is a long time I don't have opportunity to use this feature.
Then, on July one guy sent me email saying it was broken. In fact
it
was, but it
My question is how we submit patches nowadays. I couldn't find the
familiar script to diff two source trees... (Yeah, it's being a long
time...)
Makepatch doesn't exist anymore. Everyone is expected to use cvs to build
patches against the latest cvs not against fix releases. Although if you
Allan Rae wrote:
> So in summary:
> If you have cvs access but no new files use
> `cvs diff -p -N -u`
>
> if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs
> access but have added new files then get the modified diff and a script
> called packcvs from the above site
26 matches
Mail list logo
