On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 11:31, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 03:16:04AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> >
> > I've been back on this issue. I think that slightly changing the call to
> > ImageMagick is the best solution, as it will not break things that used
> to
> > work
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 03:16:04AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
>
> I've been back on this issue. I think that slightly changing the call to
> ImageMagick is the best solution, as it will not break things that used to
> work and has the potential of enabling preview of images that did not have.
I've been back on this issue. I think that slightly changing the call to
ImageMagick is the best solution, as it will not break things that used to
work and has the potential of enabling preview of images that did not have.
What do you think about this (minimalist) patch?
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at
Thibaut,
I don't know. Try both of them
TeX has nothing to do with this, it's a LyX issue.
el
On 2022-02-10 03:22 , Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 22:45, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Is the issue displaying it on the screen or in the resulting PDF?
For me, only the preview
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 22:45, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Is the issue displaying it on the screen or in the resulting PDF?
>
For me, only the preview in LyX: LaTeX handles the EPS without troubles.
> Try GraphicsMagick :-)-O
>
Isn't there a difference in the number of supported formats? Both
Is the issue displaying it on the screen or in the resulting PDF?
Try GraphicsMagick :-)-O
el
On 2022-02-09 19:46 , Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
[...]
The bundled ImageMagick (7.0.10.43) takes roughly three seconds, but
produces a PDF with two pages: the first one is either perfect or
garbage,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:06:40PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> If there is no counter-argument against this, I believe it would be the
> easiest solution overall. Otherwise, LyX could look after -1, -2 files,
> show one of them arbitrarily (say, the first one), and display a message to
> the
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:06:40PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 19:49, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> > >
> > > The main reason I'm taking this to the dev mailing list is that pdflatex
> > > doesn't
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 19:49, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> >
> > The main reason I'm taking this to the dev mailing list is that pdflatex
> > doesn't have any problem with this file, while LyX does without any
> useful
> >
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
>
> The main reason I'm taking this to the dev mailing list is that pdflatex
> doesn't have any problem with this file, while LyX does without any useful
> information for the user. I believe some tool fails when loading the image,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 18:11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:06:17AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> > Do you have any trick to debug this further? For the LyX 2.3 issue, it
> > might be a timeout for large EPS; for 2.4, I have no idea.
>
> One thing which come to my mind - do
Le 09/02/2022 à 18:08, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:06:17AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
Do you have any trick to debug this further? For the LyX 2.3 issue, it
might be a timeout for large EPS; for 2.4, I have no idea.
One thing which come to my mind - do you have set
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:06:17AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> Do you have any trick to debug this further? For the LyX 2.3 issue, it
> might be a timeout for large EPS; for 2.4, I have no idea.
One thing which come to my mind - do you have set some limits on EPS size
in imagemagick config?
On Wednesday, 9 February 2022 01.06.17 WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> A friend of mine noticed that LyX 2.3 has problems displaying the attached
> EPS file. All other EPS images can be previewed within LyX without any
> problem.
> All EPS files are displayed correctly in the PDF
On 09/02/2022 15:02, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
The image is a graph of a few KB, instead of 40MB, it'll display just
fine, which is what was to be achieved.
el
Since this is a post on the devel list, I am not sure that is all that
was to be achieved.
Daniel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
The image is a graph of a few KB, instead of 40MB, it'll display just
fine, which is what was to be achieved.
el
On 09/02/2022 15:17, Daniel wrote:
On 09/02/2022 13:00, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
TBird does not allow me to respond to my own reply but GraphicsMagic to
the rescue:
gm
On Wednesday, 9 February 2022 13.17.29 WET Daniel wrote:
> eps is a vector image, png is a bitmap. so, this might not be a
> desirable solution depending on what is to be achieved.
A small nitpick, eps allows vector images but it does not require it.
It is perfectly possible to have an eps that
On 09/02/2022 13:00, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
TBird does not allow me to respond to my own reply but GraphicsMagic to
the rescue:
gm convert undisplayable.eps u.png
results in the enclosed :-)-O
el
eps is a vector image, png is a bitmap. so, this might not be a
desirable solution
TBird does not allow me to respond to my own reply but GraphicsMagic to
the rescue:
gm convert undisplayable.eps u.png
results in the enclosed :-)-O
el
On 09/02/2022 03:06, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
Dear list,
A friend of mine noticed that LyX 2.3 has problems displaying the
attached
Thibaut,
it is not a (proper) EPS file. On my Mac the command
file undisplayable.eps
returns
undisplayable.eps: DOS EPS Binary File Postscript starts at byte
30252 length 40741791 TIFF starts at byte 30 length 30222
google shows 32 results:
20 matches
Mail list logo
