Am Montag, dem 26.12.2022 um 11:45 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> What I was thinking here was that "Other" would more or less act like
> 'literal', in the sense that it would just output whatever's there.
Yes. Would it make more sense to rename this to "Custom"? After all,
it's
On 12/26/22 07:21, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 26.12.2022 um 10:26 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Also, I think InsetHyperlink needs to be audited. Now "Web" cares for
"run:" and "[anything]//:" next to the http(s) schemes, "Other" for
all
others expect mail: and file:
Seems not
Am Montag, dem 26.12.2022 um 10:26 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Also, I think InsetHyperlink needs to be audited. Now "Web" cares for
> "run:" and "[anything]//:" next to the http(s) schemes, "Other" for
> all
> others expect mail: and file:
> Seems not consistent to me. Why is "run:"
Am Montag, dem 26.12.2022 um 09:32 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Sonntag, dem 25.12.2022 um 17:53 +0100 schrieb Richard Kimberly
> Heck:
> > +2022-12-25 Richard Kimberly Heck
> > + * Format incremented to 614: New "Other" type for
> > hyperlinks
>
> Can you make this entry please
Am Sonntag, dem 25.12.2022 um 17:53 +0100 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> +2022-12-25 Richard Kimberly Heck
> + * Format incremented to 614: New "Other" type for hyperlinks
Can you make this entry please a bit more descriptive? Which LyX/LaTeX
correspondence do we have here? Is there
