On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:07:13PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:30:20PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Funny thing is that my
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:30:20PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Funny thing is that my mutt read the previous message without doing
> > > > what you describe...
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:30:20PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > >
> > > Funny thing is that my mutt read the previous message without doing
> > > what you describe...
> >
> > I guess you are using the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:12:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I have searched a bit, and the only thing I have found (with my MUA
> Thunderbird)
> is to change _all_ my attachments to be base64. I'll try that, because I
> prefer to have you with me than against me ;), but I may have
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:50:06PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:12:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:03:32PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > This is because mutt takes them to be separate emails placed somewhere
> > > else
Le 19/10/2016 à 19:37, Richard Heck a écrit :
Yes, good for both. It will get much more testing in stable, and we are
presumably some ways from 2.2.3.
Thanks, I did that.
JMarc
Le 19/10/2016 à 19:03, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:20:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks, it seems to work well. Here is the combo commit, for reference.
Jean-Marc, please, can you use some kind of encoding (base64,
quoted-printable or whatever) when
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > Funny thing is that my mutt read the previous message without doing
> > what you describe...
>
> I guess you are using the maildir format for your mailbox.
mbox here. but mutt version is somewhat
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> Funny thing is that my mutt read the previous message without doing
> what you describe...
I guess you are using the maildir format for your mailbox.
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:20:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, it seems to work well. Here is the combo commit, for reference.
>
> Jean-Marc, please, can you use some kind of encoding (base64,
> quoted-printable or whatever) when attaching
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:12:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:03:32PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > This is because mutt takes them to be separate emails placed somewhere
> > else in the list of emails and I have to search for them or edit the
> > mailbox
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:03:32PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> This is because mutt takes them to be separate emails placed somewhere
> else in the list of emails and I have to search for them or edit the
> mailbox file to add a ">" just before "From" in order to actually see
> them as
On 10/19/2016 12:20 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 19/10/2016 à 18:12, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>> I had a look and it turns out that the code dealing with separator
>> insets was specifically tailored to the old behaviour. If you change
>> that behaviour, you should also change the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:20:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Thanks, it seems to work well. Here is the combo commit, for reference.
Jean-Marc, please, can you use some kind of encoding (base64,
quoted-printable or whatever) when attaching patches that start
with the word "From"?
Le 19/10/2016 à 18:12, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
I had a look and it turns out that the code dealing with separator
insets was specifically tailored to the old behaviour. If you change
that behaviour, you should also change the corresponding separator code.
This is what the attached patch
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:53:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 19/10/2016 à 14:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >>Tested and I think there is a minor issue. In the attached .lyx file,
> >>put the cursor at the end of "hello". Press return three times. The
> >>first two times show
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:53:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Enrico, do you have thoughts about what we really want there? What is the
> use case that we have in mind, especially when we are in a nested
> environment?
It does not seem to be something about nested environments. For
Le 19/10/2016 à 14:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Tested and I think there is a minor issue. In the attached .lyx file,
put the cursor at the end of "hello". Press return three times. The
first two times show that the issue initially reported is fixed (because
it is itemize instead of
Le 14/10/2016 à 17:16, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:22:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/10/2016 à 03:48, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I don't know much about layout nesting, but my first reaction is that I
agree with you regarding the expected behavior.
Did
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:22:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 07/10/2016 à 03:48, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > I don't know much about layout nesting, but my first reaction is that I
> > > agree with you regarding the expected behavior.
> >
> > Did we figure out what the correct
20 matches
Mail list logo