Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There are no speedups yet. I thought we would have really bad bugs to
catter for, but I was wrong. Therefore I think we should add some
speedup bugs.
What else? I am tempted to keep the change tracking patches for the
next round. There are many other small patches
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Abdelrazak I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
| Abdelrazak more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
| Abdelrazak (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:22:31AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
given the fact that some bigger changes have to go into 1.4.X sooner or
later (speedups CT), I think we should keep 1.5.X and 1.4.X in sync as
long as possible. I tried to keep track of all
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There are no speedups yet. I thought we would have really bad bugs to
catter for, but I was wrong. Therefore I think we should add some
speedup bugs.
What else? I am tempted to keep the change tracking patches for the
next round. There are many other small patches
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Abdelrazak> I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
| Abdelrazak> more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
| Abdelrazak> (RandomAccessList and
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:22:31AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
> given the fact that some bigger changes have to go into 1.4.X sooner or
> later (speedups & CT), I think we should keep 1.5.X and 1.4.X in sync as
> long as possible. I tried to keep track of
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some very bad windows bugs.
JMarc
Mañana.
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok, I know that I'm a bit behind the times, but I've just uploaded
LyX/Win 1.3.7-3 to http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137. This thing uses
the new Aspell dictionaries and seems to work well.
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or
a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some very bad windows
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or
a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in
since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some very bad windows
Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok, I know that I'm a bit behind the times, but I've just uploaded
LyX/Win 1.3.7-3 to http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137. This thing uses
the new Aspell dictionaries and seems to work well.
Great! I will download it instantly! THANK YOU!
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my opinion, the best thing to do would be to combine the best parts
of both installers into a new official installer. That's also less
confusing for an end-user compared to having both official and
unofficial versions.
That's a great idea! I think
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgouttes at ... writes:
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or
a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in
since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgouttes at ... writes:
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Angus Leeming wrote:
One further question: unless something has changed recently, LyX 1.3.x and LyX
1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I run
configure --with-version-suffix
when building LyX 1.4.
Should I do that?
I think we had this discussion before. IIRC, the conclusion was
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Angus Leeming wrote:
One further question: unless something has changed recently, LyX 1.3.x
and LyX
1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I run
configure --with-version-suffix
when building LyX 1.4.
Should I do that?
I think we had this discussion before.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Quite the contrary I would say.
Ok, then let's use --with-version-suffix.
Michael
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus From my point of view, I don't want to download a heap of stuff
Angus that I've already got installed.
We could have a network installer and a full installer. I really think
the two installers should merge.
Angus Moreover, there are
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak I think Angus fears that the time the installer is done
Abdelrazak and tested, 1.4.1 will be close to release.
Then it will be trivial to use the installer framework for 1.4.1 :)
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc you said that you want
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus One further question: unless something has changed recently,
Angus LyX 1.3.x and LyX 1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I
Angus run configure --with-version-suffix when building LyX 1.4.
Note that it is possible in windows to
Stephen == Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen So the declare a 1.4.1 release candidate makes sense to me,
Stephen a 1.4.1pre_1. The users will be happier and it provides
Stephen testing to the newly added bug fixes.
Not a bad idea actually. Just skip 1.4.0 in windows. What I did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are no speedups yet. I thought we would have really bad bugs to
catter for, but I was wrong. Therefore I think we should add some
speedup bugs.
Good!
- bruteFind speedup:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
Abdelrazak more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
Abdelrazak (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
Ha! I forgot about RandomAccessList! Did someone try it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus One further question: unless something has changed recently,
Angus LyX 1.3.x and LyX 1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I
Angus run configure --with-version-suffix when building LyX
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
Abdelrazak more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
Abdelrazak (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
Ha! I forgot about RandomAccessList! Did someone try it out on 1.4? I
did and it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen == Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen So the declare a 1.4.1 release candidate makes sense to me,
Stephen a 1.4.1pre_1. The users will be happier and it provides
Stephen testing to the newly added bug fixes.
Not a bad
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 17:25 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Ha! I forgot about RandomAccessList! Did someone try it out on 1.4? I
did and it seems to work in its latest incarnation.
It works well for me in 1.5. I did not try 1.4.
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
Abdelrazak more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
Abdelrazak (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
Ha! I forgot about
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Concerning LyX/Mac, we have several reports that make me believe that
the whole document gets rebroken/displayed at times. This is very weird.
Jean-Marc, LyX 1.4 has serious speed problems not only on the Mac.
I tried to use 1.4.0pre4 for working
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus One further question: unless something has changed recently,
Angus LyX 1.3.x and LyX 1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I
Angus run configure --with-version-suffix when building LyX
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico Jean-Marc, LyX 1.4 has serious speed problems not only on the
Enrico Mac. I tried to use 1.4.0pre4 for working on a big document
Enrico (~60 pages) with lots of figures and equations, and went back
Enrico to 1.3.7 in desperation.
Is
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus to let the binary names along means to leave the binary
Angus names alone? Sure, that would be a good idea.
It is strange how you manage to grok what I write :)
The change is as simple as removing line 594 of config/lyxinclude.m4:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Build a snapshot of the 1.4.x tree rather than use the 1.4.0
Angus tarball. Use --with-version-suffix Call the resulting installer
Angus 1.4.1_pre1 DO IT SOON!
Great.
JMarc
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak It would be an optimisation for the call in
Abdelrazak BreakParagraph. But I have not worked on it at all yet.
OK, I remember your message.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico Jean-Marc, LyX 1.4 has serious speed problems not only on the
Enrico Mac. I tried to use 1.4.0pre4 for working on a big document
Enrico (~60 pages) with lots of figures and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We could have a network installer and a full installer. I really think
the two installers should merge.
Exactly what I mean. There should be one standard and official installer
that contains only LyX itself but downloads and installs all required
components
> Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
> snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some very bad windows bugs.
JMarc
Mañana.
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok, I know that I'm a bit behind the times, but I've just uploaded
LyX/Win 1.3.7-3 to http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137. This thing uses
the new Aspell dictionaries and seems to work well.
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or
a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some very bad windows
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or
a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in
since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
tarball, unless there are some very bad windows
Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok, I know that I'm a bit behind the times, but I've just uploaded
LyX/Win 1.3.7-3 to http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137. This thing uses
the new Aspell dictionaries and seems to work well.
Great! I will download it instantly! THANK YOU!
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
> > snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
> 1.4.0 was announced?
>
> Personnally I'd prefer the plain 1.4.0
> tarball, unless
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my opinion, the best thing to do would be to combine the best parts
> of both installers into a new official installer. That's also less
> confusing for an end-user compared to having both official and
> unofficial versions.
That's a great idea! I
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ...> writes:
> > > Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or
> > > a
> > > snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in
> > > since
> > 1.4.0 was announced?
> >
> >
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ...> writes:
Moving on to LyX/Win 1.4, what should I compile? The release tar ball or a
snapshot of the 1.4.x tree including the bug fixes that have gone in since
1.4.0 was announced?
Personnally I'd
Angus Leeming wrote:
One further question: unless something has changed recently, LyX 1.3.x and LyX
1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I run
configure --with-version-suffix
when building LyX 1.4.
Should I do that?
I think we had this discussion before. IIRC, the conclusion was
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Angus Leeming wrote:
One further question: unless something has changed recently, LyX 1.3.x
and LyX
1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I run
configure --with-version-suffix
when building LyX 1.4.
Should I do that?
I think we had this discussion before.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Quite the contrary I would say.
Ok, then let's use --with-version-suffix.
Michael
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> From my point of view, I don't want to download a heap of stuff
Angus> that I've already got installed.
We could have a network installer and a full installer. I really think
the two installers should merge.
Angus> Moreover,
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I think Angus fears that the time the installer is done
Abdelrazak> and tested, 1.4.1 will be close to release.
Then it will be trivial to use the installer framework for 1.4.1 :)
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc you said
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> One further question: unless something has changed recently,
Angus> LyX 1.3.x and LyX 1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I
Angus> run configure --with-version-suffix when building LyX 1.4.
Note that it is possible in
> "Stephen" == Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> So the "declare a 1.4.1 release candidate" makes sense to me,
Stephen> a 1.4.1pre_1. The users will be happier and it provides
Stephen> testing to the newly added bug fixes.
Not a bad idea actually. Just skip 1.4.0 in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There are no speedups yet. I thought we would have really bad bugs to
catter for, but I was wrong. Therefore I think we should add some
speedup bugs.
Good!
- bruteFind speedup:
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
Abdelrazak> more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
Abdelrazak> (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
Ha! I forgot about RandomAccessList! Did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus> One further question: unless something has changed recently,
> Angus> LyX 1.3.x and LyX 1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I
> Angus> run configure --with-version-suffix
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak> I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
> Abdelrazak> more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
> Abdelrazak> (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
>
> Ha! I forgot about RandomAccessList! Did someone try it out on 1.4? I
> did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Stephen" == Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen> So the "declare a 1.4.1 release candidate" makes sense to me,
> Stephen> a 1.4.1pre_1. The users will be happier and it provides
> Stephen> testing to the newly added bug
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 17:25 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Ha! I forgot about RandomAccessList! Did someone try it out on 1.4? I
> did and it seems to work in its latest incarnation.
It works well for me in 1.5. I did not try 1.4.
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I would say that it's a good first step. No need to add
Abdelrazak> more speedup fixes. The major one would have to wait
Abdelrazak> (RandomAccessList and UpdateCounter).
Ha! I forgot
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Concerning LyX/Mac, we have several reports that make me believe that
> the whole document gets rebroken/displayed at times. This is very weird.
Jean-Marc, LyX 1.4 has serious speed problems not only on the Mac.
I tried to use 1.4.0pre4 for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> One further question: unless something has changed recently,
Angus> LyX 1.3.x and LyX 1.4.x won't live together peacefully unless I
Angus> run configure --with-version-suffix when
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> Jean-Marc, LyX 1.4 has serious speed problems not only on the
Enrico> Mac. I tried to use 1.4.0pre4 for working on a big document
Enrico> (~60 pages) with lots of figures and equations, and went back
Enrico> to 1.3.7 in
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> "to let the binary names along" means "to leave the binary
Angus> names alone"? Sure, that would be a good idea.
It is strange how you manage to grok what I write :)
The change is as simple as removing line 594 of
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Build a snapshot of the 1.4.x tree rather than use the 1.4.0
Angus> tarball. Use --with-version-suffix Call the resulting installer
Angus> 1.4.1_pre1 DO IT SOON!
Great.
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> It would be an optimisation for the call in
Abdelrazak> BreakParagraph. But I have not worked on it at all yet.
OK, I remember your message.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> Jean-Marc, LyX 1.4 has serious speed problems not only on the
> Enrico> Mac. I tried to use 1.4.0pre4 for working on a big document
> Enrico> (~60 pages) with lots of
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We could have a network installer and a full installer. I really think
the two installers should merge.
Exactly what I mean. There should be one standard and official installer
that contains only LyX itself but downloads and installs all required
components
68 matches
Mail list logo
