On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:58:47PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-09-16, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:33:08AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>
> I suggest different keywords for
>
> a) commands that switch to text mode, and
>
> b) commands that only work in text
On 2016-09-16, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:33:08AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> Le 15/09/2016 à 23:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>> >On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> >>Also, I was surprised to see that when I enter
Le 16/09/2016 à 02:41, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:33:08AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 15/09/2016 à 23:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Now same problem with the attached. I get
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:33:08AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 15/09/2016 à 23:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>
> >>Now same problem with the attached. I get $\mbox{\ensuremath{\comp}\comp}$
> >>instead of
Le 15/09/2016 à 23:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Now same problem with the attached. I get $\mbox{\ensuremath{\comp}\comp}$
instead of $\mbox{\ensuremath{\comp\comp}}$.
Also, I was surprised to see that when I enter
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>
> Now same problem with the attached. I get $\mbox{\ensuremath{\comp}\comp}$
> instead of $\mbox{\ensuremath{\comp\comp}}$.
>
> Also, I was surprised to see that when I enter \textit,\mbox,... it gets
> wrapped inside a \text
Le 15/09/2016 à 01:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 14/09/2016 à 01:39, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Oh, yes. Apparently, macros are not the only thing that may be not
up to date. Hopefully, I nailed this at 8ec91e80. Please,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 14/09/2016 à 01:39, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> >Oh, yes. Apparently, macros are not the only thing that may be not
> >up to date. Hopefully, I nailed this at 8ec91e80. Please, try again.
> >
>
>
> Unfortunately, the
Le 14/09/2016 à 01:39, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Oh, yes. Apparently, macros are not the only thing that may be not
up to date. Hopefully, I nailed this at 8ec91e80. Please, try again.
Unfortunately, the attached file which used to compile successfully no
longer does.
LyX used to export
Le 14/09/2016 à 01:39, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Oh, yes. Apparently, macros are not the only thing that may be not
up to date. Hopefully, I nailed this at 8ec91e80. Please, try again.
Thanks, I no longer have crashes on opening.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:22:33PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 13/09/2016 à 06:45, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> >The symptom seems to be the same, so I am maybe missing some case.
> >Unfortunately, without a test case there is not much I can do.
> >In the mean time I will commit both
Le 13/09/2016 à 06:45, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
The symptom seems to be the same, so I am maybe missing some case.
Unfortunately, without a test case there is not much I can do.
In the mean time I will commit both patches, as the alternative one
will also help in the other cases mentioned
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:44:05AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 12/09/2016 à 19:35, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:01:33AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > You can spare your time as I think I found the problem. The patch simply
> > > uncovered a
Le 12/09/2016 à 19:35, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:01:33AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
You can spare your time as I think I found the problem. The patch simply
uncovered a latent bug. The crash only occurs when there is a user
defined math macro. In this case,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:01:33AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > Le 11/09/2016 à 11:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> > >Please give
> > >steps or test cases for reproducing the crash and I will have a look.
> > >
> >
>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:01:33AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > Le 11/09/2016 à 11:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> > >Please give
> > >steps or test cases for reproducing the crash and I will have a look.
> > >
> >
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/09/2016 à 11:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>
> >Please give
> >steps or test cases for reproducing the crash and I will have a look.
> >
>
> It usually takes some effort. I'll try to find the time.
You can spare your
Le 11/09/2016 à 11:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:48:06AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:>
Apart from the fact that I waited for three days
(http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg196459.html),
experience tells me that who is against a change speaks up
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:48:06AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 10/09/2016 à 17:29, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:04:47PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > Tell me how much time you think it will take you. One month?
> > > Two months? Three months?
Le 10/09/2016 à 17:29, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:04:47PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Tell me how much time you think it will take you. One month?
Two months? Three months? I'll wait for that time.
No response and no other nay. So, I am going ahead.
Hi
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:04:47PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> Tell me how much time you think it will take you. One month?
> Two months? Three months? I'll wait for that time.
No response and no other nay. So, I am going ahead.
--
Enrico
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:04:47PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:05:52AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> > I would appreciate if you could fix it.
> > See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9616
>
> This is your hitch. I am not motivated in scratching it.
I did it at
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:43:27AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:13:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >
> > * if I insert a literal degree-sign from the keyboard into mathed, LyX
> > wraps it in \text while inserting,
>
> Yes, this was my doing after you
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:05:52AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> Yes, for me the hidden insertion of \ensuremath is already a step in the
> wrong direction. Correcting it becomes more difficult with more "helpfull"
> additions.
These are opinions. Mine is different.
> >> * if I insert a
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:38:05AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Friday, September 9, 2016 10:45:08 AM WEST Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Sorry, I didn't even read your logorrheic answer. I think this a
> > strategy for exhausting the opponent.
>
> This type of arguments does not help and
On Friday, September 9, 2016 10:45:08 AM WEST Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't even read your logorrheic answer. I think this a
> strategy for exhausting the opponent.
This type of arguments does not help and is detrimental in the long term for
the community. It is OK to disagree and
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:05:52AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
[snip logorrheic answer]
Sorry, I didn't even read your logorrheic answer. I think this a
strategy for exhausting the opponent.
I am in favor while you are contrary to the patch. The only way out is
voting. So, unless I get a "no"
On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:13:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:42:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> I don't want blurring the distinction of text-mode and math-mode
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:13:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:42:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
>
> >> I don't want blurring the distinction of text-mode and math-mode commands.
>
> > I don't understand this
On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:42:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I don't want blurring the distinction of text-mode and math-mode commands.
> I don't understand this argument.
For me (and others), LyX is also a way to learn LaTeX. Typing LaTeX macros
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:42:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:58:10AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> >> On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:45:31PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> >>
On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:58:10AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:45:31PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> Dear Developers,
>> >> pending a decision about handling of text-mode
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:58:10AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:45:31PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> >> Dear Developers,
>
> >> pending a decision about handling of text-mode commands in mathed, is it
> >> OK to submit
On 2016-09-08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:45:31PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Dear Developers,
>> pending a decision about handling of text-mode commands in mathed, is it
>> OK to submit the following minimal-invasive patch to prevent the math
>> toolbars inserting
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:45:31PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> pending a decision about handling of text-mode commands in mathed, is it
> OK to submit the following minimal-invasive patch to prevent the math
> toolbars inserting symbols in a way that makes document
35 matches
Mail list logo
