Andre Poenitz wrote:
(2) Most users just don't know about amsmath and what it does. For
example, in normal latex, if you have a numbered equation that is too
wide, the equation will overwrite the equation number. However, if you
include amsmath, the equation number will be moved down.
remember that there is a button use amsmath in layout-document-extra
;-)
To be honest, I have not used anything from the menus except the file
menu since 1.0.4 or so
from my point of view this should be important! with this option all
the ams-mathstuff can be used and otherwise not (if
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| remember that there is a button use amsmath in layout-document-extra
| ;-)
|
| To be honest, I have not used anything from the menus except the file
| menu since 1.0.4 or so
|
| from my point of view this should be important! with this option all
|
| If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
| (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
| anyway...)
I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
features.
Ok.. which goes back to the original question: Can we assume
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
| | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
| | anyway...)
|
| I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
| features.
|
| Ok..
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into
\eqnarray | (Not that I know where to find this kind of
information, but | anyway...)
I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
features.
Andre Ok..
On 23 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
total 20
drwxr-xr-x 4 289 120 512 Apr 6 2000 amslatex
drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 3072 Apr 15 06:52 babel
drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 512 Aug 31 2000 cyrillic
drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 512 Aug 31
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert amslatex is not amsmath! amsmath is in
Herbert /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/amsmath/
So, what is in amslatex/math/ on CTAN? I'm not discussing teTeX
hierarchy, but CTAN.
JMarc
Andre admitted,
I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t e and
align by M-m t a ('t' like 'type') with entrys for both in the menus.
But I don't know anything about the concerned religions so maybe this would
be Wrong.
I'm an agnostic here, but I just don't see
I'm an agnostic here, but I just don't see where to put my [in]equality
type operator without a middle column . . .
Looks like it goes to the right column. Which looks ugly if operators in
different lines are of different size as some people pointed out.
On the other hand, if they are of the
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
| | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
| | anyway...)
|
| I'd rather
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > (2) Most users just don't know about amsmath and what it does. For
> > example, in normal latex, if you have a numbered equation that is too
> > wide, the equation will overwrite the equation number. However, if you
> > include amsmath, the equation number will be
> remember that there is a button "use amsmath" in layout->document->extra
> ;-)
To be honest, I have not used anything from the menus except the file
menu since 1.0.4 or so
> from my point of view this should be important! with this option all
> the ams-mathstuff can be used and otherwise not
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > remember that there is a button "use amsmath" in layout->document->extra
| > ;-)
|
| To be honest, I have not used anything from the menus except the file
| menu since 1.0.4 or so
|
| > from my point of view this should be important! with this
> | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
> | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
> | anyway...)
>
> I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
> features.
Ok.. which goes back to the original question: Can we
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
| > | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
| > | anyway...)
| >
| > I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
| > features.
|
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into
>> \eqnarray | (Not that I know where to find this kind of
>> information, but | anyway...)
>>
>> I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
>>
On 23 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> total 20
> drwxr-xr-x 4 289 120 512 Apr 6 2000 amslatex
> drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 3072 Apr 15 06:52 babel
> drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 512 Aug 31 2000 cyrillic
> drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 512 Aug
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> amslatex is not amsmath! amsmath is in
Herbert> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/amsmath/
So, what is in amslatex/math/ on CTAN? I'm not discussing teTeX
hierarchy, but CTAN.
JMarc
Andre admitted,
> I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t e and
> align by M-m t a ('t' like 'type') with entrys for both in the menus.
> But I don't know anything about the concerned religions so maybe this would
> be Wrong.
I'm an agnostic here, but I just don't see
> I'm an agnostic here, but I just don't see where to put my [in]equality
> type operator without a middle column . . .
Looks like it goes to the right column. Which looks ugly if operators in
different lines are of different size as some people pointed out.
On the other hand, if they are of
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
> | > | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
> | > | anyway...)
> | >
>
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins
Dekel wrote:
I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a
2x3 multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
Is this a side effect, or is this
Dekel This is intentional: LyX now uses the align env. instead of
Dekel eqnarray. If you want eqnarray, use Edit-Math-Make eqnarray.
Dekel It is also possible to return to previous behavior by putting
Dekel bind C-Return break-line e in your bind file.
As was said before, I really think we
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
Yes, probably...
Andre I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t
Andre e and align by M-m t a ('t' like 'type') with entrys for both
Andre in the menus. But
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
Yes, probably...
Andre I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t
Andre e and
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
Yes, probably...
Andre I think in the end we can have both, getting
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:53:29AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I think that the improvement you gain by using align (e.g. no ugly spaces)
justifies to make it the default. In my opinion, people should use align
instead of eqnarray. If we change C-return to create an eqnarray,
most users
(2) Most users just don't know about amsmath and what it does. For
example, in normal latex, if you have a numbered equation that is too
wide, the equation will overwrite the equation number. However, if you
include amsmath, the equation number will be moved down. So it could be
argued
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins
Dekel> wrote:
>> I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a
>> 2x3 multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
>>
>> Is this a side
> Dekel> This is intentional: LyX now uses the align env. instead of
> Dekel> eqnarray. If you want eqnarray, use Edit->Math->Make eqnarray.
> Dekel> It is also possible to return to previous behavior by putting
> Dekel> bind "C-Return" "break-line e" in your bind file.
>
> As was said before, I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
Yes, probably...
Andre> I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t
Andre> e and align by M-m t a ('t' like 'type') with entrys for both
Andre> in
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
>
> Yes, probably...
>
> Andre> I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Andre> Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
> >
> > Yes, probably...
> >
> > Andre> I think in the end we can
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:53:29AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > I think that the improvement you gain by using align (e.g. no ugly spaces)
> > justifies to make it the default. In my opinion, people should use align
> > instead of eqnarray. If we change C-return to create an eqnarray,
> > most
> (2) Most users just don't know about amsmath and what it does. For
> example, in normal latex, if you have a numbered equation that is too
> wide, the equation will overwrite the equation number. However, if you
> include amsmath, the equation number will be moved down. So it could be
>
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a 2x3
multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
Is this a side effect, or is this the way it's syupposed to be?
This is intentional: LyX
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a 2x3
> multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
>
> Is this a side effect, or is this the way it's syupposed to be?
This is intentional:
38 matches
Mail list logo
