Angus Leeming wrote:
I've just uploaded a new version including all changes to both Qt and
to LyX up to 3pm GMT today (Sunday).
But without the documentation, right?
Michael
Angus Leeming wrote:
I've just uploaded a new version including all changes to both Qt and
to LyX up to 3pm GMT today (Sunday).
But without the documentation, right?
Michael
Angus Leeming wrote:
Michael Gerz wrote:
Why not substitute your qt_mt3.dll for mine and see how LyX looks then?
Surprise, surprise, the bold font has gone! Did you _really_ download
the latest QT sources? From the right branch?
Who knows. I've just cvs up-ed and rebuilt the .dll. I'll
Angus Leeming wrote:
Michael Gerz wrote:
Why not substitute your qt_mt3.dll for mine and see how LyX looks then?
Surprise, surprise, the bold font has gone! Did you _really_ download
the latest QT sources? From the right branch?
Who knows. I've just "cvs up-ed" and rebuilt the .dll. I'll
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
How about just LyX then? No spaces, and no copying documents when
LyX 1.4 appear. It will be able to deal with 1.3.x documents, I belive.
Michael wants to be able to have both installed...
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> >Helge Hafting wrote:
> >
> >
> >>How about just "LyX" then? No spaces, and no copying documents when
> >>LyX 1.4 appear. It will be able to deal with 1.3.x documents, I belive.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Michael wants to be
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:39:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Angus Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
Angus Why don't we use
[...]
Angus which would give us C:\Documents and
Helge Hafting wrote:
How about just LyX then? No spaces, and no copying documents when
LyX 1.4 appear. It will be able to deal with 1.3.x documents, I belive.
Michael wants to be able to have both installed...
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
How about just LyX then? No spaces, and no copying documents when
LyX 1.4 appear. It will be able to deal with 1.3.x documents, I belive.
Michael wants to be able to have both installed...
Please ignore my request.
I didn't know that the
Angus Leeming wrote:
I am puzzled. I just compiled the lastest CVS of qtwin. If I start its
designer, the menu items (File, Edit, ...) have normal font, whereas
menu items in your LyX 1.3.7cvs have bold font. What does
qt-3/bin/designer look like on your machine?
Why not substitute your
Michael Gerz wrote:
Why not substitute your qt_mt3.dll for mine and see how LyX looks then?
Surprise, surprise, the bold font has gone! Did you _really_ download
the latest QT sources? From the right branch?
Who knows. I've just cvs up-ed and rebuilt the .dll. I'll upload the new
version.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:39:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> writes:
> >
> > Angus> Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
> > Angus> Why don't we use
> > [...]
> > Angus> which
Helge Hafting wrote:
> How about just "LyX" then? No spaces, and no copying documents when
> LyX 1.4 appear. It will be able to deal with 1.3.x documents, I belive.
Michael wants to be able to have both installed...
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
How about just "LyX" then? No spaces, and no copying documents when
LyX 1.4 appear. It will be able to deal with 1.3.x documents, I belive.
Michael wants to be able to have both installed...
Please ignore my request.
I didn't know that
Angus Leeming wrote:
I am puzzled. I just compiled the lastest CVS of qtwin. If I start its
"designer", the menu items (File, Edit, ...) have normal font, whereas
menu items in your LyX 1.3.7cvs have bold font. What does
qt-3/bin/designer look like on your machine?
Why not substitute
Michael Gerz wrote:
Why not substitute your qt_mt3.dll for mine and see how LyX looks then?
Surprise, surprise, the bold font has gone! Did you _really_ download
the latest QT sources? From the right branch?
Who knows. I've just "cvs up-ed" and rebuilt the .dll. I'll upload the new
version.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Angus,
In fact, I've just done this ;-) Uwe, feel free to grab the updated
binaries and libraries for your installer.
Thanks for the new installer!
Have you included the latest qtwin library?
Yes.
The menu entries are shown with bold font which looks
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
Angus Why don't we use
[...]
Angus which would give us C:\Documents and Settings\Angus\Application
Angus Data\LyX_1.3.7
First, the '_' is very un-windows-ish, it should be a space
Angus Leeming wrote:
It would also be nice if you compiled the sources with
--with-version-suffix (which helps people who switch between 1.4 and
1.3).
Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
C:\Documents and Settings\Angus\Application Data\LyX
Why don't we use
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Angus Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
Angus Why don't we use
[...]
Angus which would give us C:\Documents and Settings\Angus\Application
Angus Data\LyX_1.3.7
First, the '_' is
Angus Leeming wrote:
The menu entries are shown with bold font which looks pretty ugly. I
haven't tested the latest qtwin sources but the snapshot of 2005-10-31
doesn't have this bug and, browsing through the recent patches, I see
no reason why it should have changed since then.
I am
Michael Gerz wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
The menu entries are shown with bold font which looks pretty ugly. I
haven't tested the latest qtwin sources but the snapshot of 2005-10-31
doesn't have this bug and, browsing through the recent patches, I see
no reason why it should have changed since
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Angus,
>
>>In fact, I've just done this ;-) Uwe, feel free to grab the updated
>>binaries and libraries for your installer.
>
> Thanks for the new installer!
>
> Have you included the latest qtwin library?
Yes.
> The menu entries are shown with bold font which
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
Angus> Why don't we use
[...]
Angus> which would give us C:\Documents and Settings\Angus\Application
Angus> Data\LyX_1.3.7
First, the '_' is very un-windows-ish, it
Angus Leeming wrote:
>> It would also be nice if you compiled the sources with
>> --with-version-suffix (which helps people who switch between 1.4 and
>> 1.3).
>
> Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
> C:\Documents and Settings\Angus\Application Data\LyX
> Why don't
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Angus> Hm. The problem here is the LyX User directory only, no?
> Angus> Why don't we use
> [...]
> Angus> which would give us C:\Documents and Settings\Angus\Application
> Angus>
Angus Leeming wrote:
The menu entries are shown with bold font which looks pretty ugly. I
haven't tested the latest qtwin sources but the snapshot of 2005-10-31
doesn't have this "bug" and, browsing through the recent patches, I see
no reason why it should have changed since then.
I am
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>>>The menu entries are shown with bold font which looks pretty ugly. I
>>>haven't tested the latest qtwin sources but the snapshot of 2005-10-31
>>>doesn't have this "bug" and, browsing through the recent patches, I see
>>>no reason why it should have
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael The list of changes for 1.3.7 isn't very long but we have
Michael made a couple of GUI improvements since 1.3.6 that users will
Michael appreciate.
Yes. One thing I would like to fix is the fact this it does not
run on OSX with gcc3.
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael I remember Jean-Marc mentioning that he will release 1.3.7 as
Michael soon as the 1.4.0 file format is fixed. (which has
Michael implications on lyx2lyx). So the question is: Is the 1.4.0
Michael file format fixed?
If there is a real
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> The list of changes for 1.3.7 isn't very long but we have
Michael> made a couple of GUI improvements since 1.3.6 that users will
Michael> appreciate.
Yes. One thing I would like to fix is the fact this it does not
run on OSX
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I remember Jean-Marc mentioning that he will release 1.3.7 as
Michael> soon as the 1.4.0 file format is fixed. (which has
Michael> implications on lyx2lyx). So the question is: Is the 1.4.0
Michael> file format fixed?
If there
Georg Baum schrieb:
All valid reasons. My concern is that your LyX will diverge from mainline,
and I think that this would be very bad.
Why not feed your improvements back to mainline instead of offering them
only to the windows people?
I'll do. What special things do you mean should be
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
p.s.
Angus, Michael, what about the efforts of compiling LyX 1.4 under
Win? (Yes I know that I need to lift up my ass and try to compile it
for myself.)
I build a new LyX 1.4.0 on Windows about once a week. However, I don't
know whether Angus has added some magic to the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Don't beat me for the following proposal:
I can see no reason why tex2lyx need to be backported to LyX 1.3.x.
tex2lyx runs fine with 1.3.x as it is.
I also think that my LyX diverges a bit from mainline, so I'd like to
see 1.3.7 out WITH tex2lyx and perhaps with some of my
Michael Gerz wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Don't beat me for the following proposal:
I can see no reason why tex2lyx need to be backported to LyX 1.3.x.
tex2lyx runs fine with 1.3.x as it is.
I also think that my LyX diverges a bit from mainline, so I'd like to
see 1.3.7 out WITH tex2lyx and
Michael Gerz wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
p.s.
Angus, Michael, what about the efforts of compiling LyX 1.4 under
Win? (Yes I know that I need to lift up my ass and try to compile it
for myself.)
I build a new LyX 1.4.0 on Windows about once a week. However, I don't
know whether Angus has
Michael Gerz schrieb:
The list of changes for 1.3.7 isn't very long but we have made a couple
of GUI improvements since 1.3.6 that users will appreciate. If we
replaced reLyX by tex2lyx (provided that tex2lyx is indeed better in
most cases and there are no major bugzilla entries for it) we
Georg Baum schrieb:
All valid reasons. My concern is that your LyX will diverge from mainline,
and I think that this would be very bad.
Why not feed your improvements back to mainline instead of offering them
only to the windows people?
I'll do. What special things do you mean should be
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
p.s.
Angus, Michael, what about the efforts of compiling LyX 1.4 under
Win? (Yes I know that I need to lift up my ass and try to compile it
for myself.)
I build a new LyX 1.4.0 on Windows about once a week. However, I don't
know whether Angus has added some magic to the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Don't beat me for the following proposal:
I can see no reason why tex2lyx need to be backported to LyX 1.3.x.
tex2lyx runs fine with 1.3.x as it is.
I also think that my LyX diverges a bit from mainline, so I'd like to
see 1.3.7 out WITH tex2lyx and perhaps with some of my
Michael Gerz wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Don't beat me for the following proposal:
I can see no reason why tex2lyx need to be backported to LyX 1.3.x.
tex2lyx runs fine with 1.3.x as it is.
I also think that my LyX diverges a bit from mainline, so I'd like to
see 1.3.7 out WITH tex2lyx and
Michael Gerz wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
p.s.
Angus, Michael, what about the efforts of compiling LyX 1.4 under
Win? (Yes I know that I need to lift up my ass and try to compile it
for myself.)
I build a new LyX 1.4.0 on Windows about once a week. However, I don't
know whether Angus has
Michael Gerz schrieb:
The list of changes for 1.3.7 isn't very long but we have made a couple
of GUI improvements since 1.3.6 that users will appreciate. If we
replaced reLyX by tex2lyx (provided that tex2lyx is indeed better in
most cases and there are no major bugzilla entries for it) we
44 matches
Mail list logo
