On 2023-01-25 07:53, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 25.01.2023 um 09:43 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
The urge to get a round number like 150 or 200 is strong, almost
compulsive, but fiddly with the slider requiring multiple attempts.
The zoom slider values are relative to the
On 2023-01-25 18:00, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 25.01.2023 um 17:02 +0100 schrieb Daniel:
I cannot reproduce with preview beta2. When clicking on +/-, I get
steps of 15%. Given that the (system) default is 150%,
Well, 15% is 10% of 150%.
I cannot get to 200% that way.
You
Am Mittwoch, dem 25.01.2023 um 17:02 +0100 schrieb Daniel:
> I cannot reproduce with preview beta2. When clicking on +/-, I get
> steps of 15%. Given that the (system) default is 150%,
Well, 15% is 10% of 150%.
> I cannot get to 200% that way.
You need to set default zoom to either 100% or
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:23:55AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I can reproduce it only when not running under gdb.
It also seem impossible to reproduce when compiling with debug symbols.
Without them reproducibility seems to depends on the exact trajectory I do
with the mouse over the editing
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 09:41:48PM +0900, Yokota K. wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Here is updated LaTeXConfig.lyx in which bxjsclasses (extended Japanese new
> standard class) added. The class supports XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX so that
> users can use it without relying on Japanese local pLaTeX to write
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:23:55AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> But fun times ahead! I get SIGSEGV when loading your file (when view is
> scrolled on your changes).
>
> I can reproduce it only when not running under gdb.
It seems that the crash happens just after preview background run is
