Le 28/01/2023 à 19:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 22/01/2023 à 03:36, Stefano Simonucci a écrit :
Do you use HiDPI on your system?
I don't know. How I can know it?
HiDPI is used for monitors with really high resolution, where text and
UI would be too small.
On plain Ubuntu, I can
Dear Developers,
I performed a first update of the French 2.4 documentation around 20 months ago.
I would like to search easily what has been updated since (but for the new index
features that I have already updated in the UserGuide).
Is it possible to search for modifications after a given
On 2023-01-29 17:37, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Sonntag, dem 29.01.2023 um 17:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
I would like to search easily what has been updated since (but for
the new index
features that I have already updated in the UserGuide).
Is it possible to search for
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 05:37:30PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 29.01.2023 um 17:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
> > I would like to search easily what has been updated since (but for
> > the new index
> > features that I have already updated in the UserGuide).
> >
On 29/01/2023 11:37 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
In the AMS extended theorem modules, we define a theorem type
"Acknowledgement". However, to my best knowledge, the US English
spelling is acknowledgment (vs. British acknowledgement).
I wonder whether this should be changed (and the Britisch
Le 29/01/2023 à 17:37, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, dem 29.01.2023 um 17:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
I would like to search easily what has been updated since (but for
the new index
features that I have already updated in the UserGuide).
Is it possible to search for
Am Sonntag, dem 29.01.2023 um 17:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
> I would like to search easily what has been updated since (but for
> the new index
> features that I have already updated in the UserGuide).
> Is it possible to search for modifications after a given date in the
>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 09:49:09AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 14:28 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > The following tests just started to fail:
> >
> > 3581 -
> > export/examples/Articles/Astronomy_%26_Astrophysics_lyx22 (Failed)
> > 3582 -
>
Am Sonntag, dem 29.01.2023 um 23:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Compilation with system fonts and LuaTeX fails for me with the
> Embedded
> Object manual because of the following preamble code:
>
> %% Added by the translator
> % Correction for PDF bookmarks
>
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact
> from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas
> with words like "colour" and "tyre" it has "colour (US color)", "tyre
> (US tire)". In
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 19:55 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Indeed that works. Does anyone have a suggestion for which font to
> > use?
>
> IPAGothic (not IPAexGothic). This one is also already used in the
>
Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 19:55 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Indeed that works. Does anyone have a suggestion for which font to
> use?
IPAGothic (not IPAexGothic). This one is also already used in the
Tutorial, and it is a monotype font.
--
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 14:28 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> The following tests just started to fail:
>
> 3581 -
> export/examples/Articles/Astronomy_%26_Astrophysics_lyx22 (Failed)
> 3582 -
> export/examples/Articles/Astronomy_%26_Astrophysics_lyx23 (Failed)
>
In the AMS extended theorem modules, we define a theorem type
"Acknowledgement". However, to my best knowledge, the US English
spelling is acknowledgment (vs. British acknowledgement).
I wonder whether this should be changed (and the Britisch spelling
added via l7n). The LaTeX command name can
14 matches
Mail list logo
