Re: r34591 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/scripts src src/insets src/tex2lyx

On 2010-06-08, José Matos wrote: On the same vein as your work and since I dislike the latex output of lyx- beamer I have a workaround in the form of a python script and another layout. Did already you consider using custom insets for the frames? I started doing this for the seminar.layout.

Re: XML format status

On 09/06/10 04:27, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 08.06.2010, 17:22 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: On 06/08/2010 03:49 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 08.06.2010, 20:52 +0200 schrieb Andre Poenitz: On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On

Re: XML format status

On 2010-06-08, Sam Liddicott wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --050502020101020702060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/06/10 15:27, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sam Liddicott wrote: I also still

Re: XML format status

Guenter Milde wrote: On 2010-06-08, Sam Liddicott wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --050502020101020702060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/06/10 15:27, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sam

Re: XML format status

Sam Liddicott wrote: I would prefer a more readable format than XML like json, even I would use Lua, because it is the future scripting languange in LaTeX, but I assume we could never explain the rest of the world, why we we don't use beloved XML. So let's use XML. And validating a XML with a

Re: XML format status

On 09/06/10 09:10, Pavel Sanda wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: On 2010-06-08, Sam Liddicott wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --050502020101020702060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/06/10 15:27,

Re: XML format status

Sam Liddicott wrote: Thanks - you give me good hope. It is ironic that I want to use Lyx to avoid having to know docbook too well, but may have to learn it to fixup lyx! we are waiting for your mail :) pavel

Re: [Patch] New version of Keytest.

John McCabe-Dansted wrote: I was wondering, would you prefer it if I could submit future updates to keytest as a set of smaller patches, rather than one big one? i would prefer to give you a commit access. its pita to apply patches with new files and changed svn properties because one needs to

Re: Compiler Warnings

Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes: Apropos... What about this? Looks good. JMarc

Re: r34591 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/scripts src src/insets src/tex2lyx

2010/6/9 Guenter Milde: Did already you consider using custom insets for the frames? I started doing this for the seminar.layout. This easily translates to the way these environments are used in LaTeX. While I agree this is cleaner, there are also disadvantages: 1. you lose the outliner

Re: [PATCH for branch] warnings and const

Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: OK for branch? Yes. The 3 patches have been applied. JMarc

Re: [Patch] New version of Keytest.

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes: John McCabe-Dansted wrote: I was wondering, would you prefer it if I could submit future updates to keytest as a set of smaller patches, rather than one big one? i would prefer to give you a commit access. its pita to apply patches with new files and

Re: lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

Joost Verburg jo...@lyx.org writes: I was wondering how I can make paths in e.g. the path_prefix in lyxrc.dist relative to the LyX installation directory? For example, instead of, \path_prefix C:\Program Files (x86)\LyX16\dir something like: \path_prefix %LYXDIR%\dir I'm trying to make

Re: r34635 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/tex2lyx

rgh...@lyx.org writes: Also, disable corresponding code for required arguments. tex2lyx does not produce a high enough file format yet for this to make sense, I don't think. Indeed. JMarc

Re: lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

On 6/9/2010 10:17 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: One solution would be to make relative paths relative to lyxdir (and maybe userdir too). Would that make sense to you? Yes, that makes perfect sense. It will make the Windows installer less complicated and allow for a portable version to be

Re: r34591 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/scripts src src/insets src/tex2lyx

On 2010-06-08, José Matos wrote: > On the same vein as your work and since I dislike the latex output of > lyx- beamer I have a workaround in the form of a python script and > another layout. Did already you consider using custom insets for the frames? I started doing this for the

Re: XML format status

On 09/06/10 04:27, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 08.06.2010, 17:22 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: On 06/08/2010 03:49 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 08.06.2010, 20:52 +0200 schrieb Andre Poenitz: On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On

Re: XML format status

On 2010-06-08, Sam Liddicott wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --050502020101020702060201 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > On 08/06/10 15:27, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Sam Liddicott wrote: >>> I also

Re: XML format status

Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2010-06-08, Sam Liddicott wrote: > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --050502020101020702060201 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > On 08/06/10 15:27, Pavel Sanda wrote:

Re: XML format status

Sam Liddicott wrote: >> I would prefer a more readable format than XML like json, even I would >> use Lua, because it is the future scripting languange in LaTeX, but >> I assume we could never explain the rest of the world, why we we don't >> use beloved XML. So let's use XML. And validating a XML

Re: XML format status

On 09/06/10 09:10, Pavel Sanda wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: On 2010-06-08, Sam Liddicott wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --050502020101020702060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/06/10 15:27,

Re: XML format status

Sam Liddicott wrote: > Thanks - you give me good hope. > It is ironic that I want to use Lyx to avoid having to know docbook too > well, but may have to learn it to fixup lyx! we are waiting for your mail :) pavel

Re: [Patch] New version of Keytest.

John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > I was wondering, would you prefer it if I could submit future updates > to keytest as a set of smaller patches, rather than one big one? i would prefer to give you a commit access. its pita to apply patches with new files and changed svn properties because one needs

Re: Compiler Warnings

Stephan Witt writes: > Apropos... > > What about this? Looks good. JMarc

Re: r34591 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/scripts src src/insets src/tex2lyx

2010/6/9 Guenter Milde: > Did already you consider using custom insets for the frames? > > I started doing this for the seminar.layout. > This easily translates to the way these environments are used in LaTeX. While I agree this is cleaner, there are also disadvantages: 1. you lose the outliner

Re: [PATCH for branch] warnings and const

Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: >> OK for branch? > > Yes. The 3 patches have been applied. JMarc

Re: [Patch] New version of Keytest.

Pavel Sanda writes: > John McCabe-Dansted wrote: >> I was wondering, would you prefer it if I could submit future updates >> to keytest as a set of smaller patches, rather than one big one? > > i would prefer to give you a commit access. > > its pita to apply patches with new

Re: lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

Joost Verburg writes: > I was wondering how I can make paths in e.g. the path_prefix in > lyxrc.dist relative to the LyX installation directory? > > For example, instead of, > > \path_prefix "C:\Program Files (x86)\LyX16\dir" > > something like: > > \path_prefix "%LYXDIR%\dir" > >

Re: r34635 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/tex2lyx

rgh...@lyx.org writes: > Also, disable corresponding code for required arguments. tex2lyx does > not produce a high enough file format yet for this to make sense, I > don't think. Indeed. JMarc

Re: lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

On 6/9/2010 10:17 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: One solution would be to make relative paths relative to lyxdir (and maybe userdir too). Would that make sense to you? Yes, that makes perfect sense. It will make the Windows installer less complicated and allow for a portable version to be