On 2010-10-21, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
but now we have new problem - how to notice user that exporting is stillbr=
in progress or finished (some subvserion of hourglass cursor?).br
Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages.
greyed out (or otherwise modified) export toolbar buttons?
Am 22.10.2010 um 01:07 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
If the principle way is ok I can do the same for the RCS and SVN backend
too.
One question regarding the View log button of repoUpdate:
here on Mac the dialog to display the log is unusable.
It is blocked by the next
Le 22/10/2010 02:10, uwesto...@lyx.org a écrit :
Log:
- lyxsweave.R: set missing SVN EOL style and add missing makefile entry
- lib/Makefile.am: add missing scripts
Thanks, Uwe.
JMarc
On 10/22/2010 03:25 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#6710: table dialog broken
--+-
Reporter: uwestoehr |Owner: nob...@…
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: high |
Pavel Sanda wrote:
this thinko-part smells like trunk stuff unless it really fixes something.
It really fixes something. If you drop file a.tex and b.tex onto LyX, current
LyX tries to import a.tex twice, and b.tex not at all. The fix assures that
both a.tex and b.tex are imported (and only
// Asynchronously post the event. DropEvent usually come
// from the BufferView. But reloading a file might close
// the BufferView from within its own event handler.
- guiApp-dispatchDelayed(cmd);
+ guiApp-addtoFuncRequestQueue(cmd);
event-accept();
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
// Asynchronously post the event. DropEvent usually come
// from the BufferView. But reloading a file might close
// the BufferView from within its own event handler.
- guiApp-dispatchDelayed(cmd);
+
One remark: I refactored the buffer reloading, so I don't think it is
still true that a BufferView can close itself now on reloading.
So you think I can just ditch the comment? (Actually, it's also not posted
asynchronously anymore, unless I do my second proposed change).
Jürgen
I think
Guenter Milde wrote:
Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages.
greyed out (or otherwise modified) export toolbar buttons?
wont help in case you use only menu.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think you can. However, I can't judge right now whether it's better
to do it asynchronously or not. So, it might be that we should still
do it asynchronously, but the reasoning stated in the comment is not
valid anymore.
I propose the following patch (diff
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think you can. However, I can't judge right now whether it's better
to do it asynchronously or not. So, it might be that we should still
do it asynchronously, but the reasoning stated in
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Only three nitpicks:
- There will be some point in time that I will start wondering what
the difference is between processing the queue and performing the
requests. Then I'll find out that they do the same thing but that the
only difference is that performing
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
since it's not only used in GuiApplication itself.
not now
Jürgen
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:10:02 2010
New Revision: 35765
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35765
Log:
Allow newer autoconf
Modified:
lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/autogen.sh
lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/status.16x
Modified:
Le 22/10/2010 14:21, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
trunk does not show this behaviour. JMarc, do you have idea?
Branch uses libtool, trunk does not. I fear that using recent autoconf
means switching to libtool 2. See for example this mail:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/ac/msg10004.html
Am 22.10.2010 um 02:11 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I made a new patch to implement getDiff() and use it to avoid the query for
log message
before checkIn() is done and the confirmation on revert when no diff is
found.
thanks for your patience, i went closely through the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Branch uses libtool, trunk does not. I fear that using recent autoconf
means switching to libtool 2. See for example this mail:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/ac/msg10004.html
ok, so i'll revert this patch.
pavel
Am 22.10.2010 um 14:53 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 22/10/2010 14:21, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
trunk does not show this behaviour. JMarc, do you have idea?
Branch uses libtool, trunk does not. I fear that using recent autoconf means
switching to libtool 2. See for example this mail:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no log message)
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx
i looked why lyx ignored my
On 10/21/2010 07:17 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages.
Op 22 okt 2010 01:13 schreef Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org
mailto:sa...@lyx.org:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20...
i checked that
Am 22.10.2010 um 15:28 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 22.10.2010 um 02:11 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
@@ -212,8 +213,9 @@
docstring text = bformat(_(Reverting to the stored version of the
document %1$s will lose all current
changes.\n\n
Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no log message)
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx
i
Richard Heck wrote:
Along these same lines, I wonder if we should pop up an info box when
the export is done. If it takes a while, then the user may not notice the
status message, and those get over-written quickly, anyway.
In a way, that would solve this issue: It's still going until you get
Am 22.10.2010 um 15:28 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 22.10.2010 um 02:11 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
While doing some stress test with checkIn() I found the error message when
merge is needed
Something's wrong with cvs commit not acceptable. Then I tried to change
that and
i suppose for the same reason that we cannot have a pointing finger
when the mouse hovers something clickable...
On 2010-10-22, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Along these same lines, I wonder if we should pop up an info box when
the export is done. If it takes a while,
Stephan Witt wrote:
the error case is suspicious. if tempName fails or cvs diff fails how you
detect
this on a higher stage? cmiiw but if something fails you identify it with
having
empty diff, which looks wrong, even more if you release lock automatically
in such
a case...
Jurgen,
Because I love to nitpick:
+void GuiApplication::processFuncRequestQueueAsync()
+{
+ // We perform the events asynchronously. This prevents potential
+ // problems in case the BufferView is closed within an event.
Well, this comment is not in the right position after all.
While eating I thought of more.
I moved the functions to another place in the header and made
dispatchDelayed a private function, since it's now only used in
GuiApplication itself.
I think it's better to make it public anyway.
- the fact whether a function is public or private should be based
On 10/22/2010 10:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no log message)
Modified:
On 10/22/2010 01:01 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/22/2010 10:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no
This patch got buried when I was distracted by my thesis. Apologies
for the delay.
I address the comments to the previous patch.
Notes:
1) The potential security issue has been addressed by only using LyX's viewers.
2) Richard suggested that I regenerate the filename/url on demand, I
discuss why
Hi,
Can someone on a Mac test the following ?
- open LyX
- open a document
- save a bookmark
- close the document and make sure you don't have any views left
- try to navigate to the bookmark
Does LyX now assert ?
Thanks,
Vincent
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
Hi,
Can someone on a Mac test the following ?
- open LyX
- open a document
- save a bookmark
- close the document and make sure you don't have any views left
- try to navigate to the bookmark
Does LyX now assert
Nope -- it works fine for me with near current svn (built yesterday).
BH
Thanks.
But it is strange as I see this code:
void GuiApplication::gotoBookmark(unsigned int idx, bool openFile,
bool switchToBuffer)
{
LASSERT(current_view_);
}
I don't understand this. On a Mac you can
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
Nope -- it works fine for me with near current svn (built yesterday).
BH
Thanks.
But it is strange as I see this code:
void GuiApplication::gotoBookmark(unsigned int idx, bool openFile,
bool switchToBuffer)
{
Sorry -- I had other windows open. If I close everything else, and
then try navigating to a bookmark, I get an error beep and nothing
else happens.
That must be the assert then.
Moreover -- something I hadn't noticed before -- if all
windows are closed, it's not possible to open a new window
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
Sorry -- I had other windows open. If I close everything else, and
then try navigating to a bookmark, I get an error beep and nothing
else happens.
That must be the assert then.
No. It's just the OS's warning beep
Yet another question.
If you normally would reconfigure LyX, you get a message like Running
configure... in the status bar. Then you know you have to wait.
What do you expect on Mac if you don't have any window open ? Now,
there is no way of telling that configure is running, right ?
Do you
Yet another question.
If you normally would reconfigure LyX, you get a message like Running
configure... in the status bar. Then you know you have to wait.
What do you expect on Mac if you don't have any window open ? Now,
there is no way of telling that configure is running, right ?
Do you
Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
to post one later.
BH
I think the culprit might be in this code:
void GuiApplication::processKeySym(KeySymbol const keysym, KeyModifier state)
{
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
to post one later.
BH
I fixed a number of problems that might occur without
Hi Pavel
Thanks. Will do.
I will change to 2.0 - Uwe has just made the same suggestion. The way I have
worked in the past was because that was the instruction in the Help files when
I first began submitting changes occasionally some years ago.
John
--
On Friday 22 October 2010 20:08:50 you
John R Hudson wrote:
Hi Pavel
Thanks. Will do.
I will change to 2.0 - Uwe has just made the same suggestion. The way I have
worked in the past was because that was the instruction in the Help files
when
I first began submitting changes occasionally some years ago.
btw are you able to
On 22/10/2010 4:15 PM, John R Hudson wrote:
5.19 RevTeX4
[paragraph 1]The Revtex 4 textclass works with the American Physical
Sociey's RevTeX 4.1 class. [I haven't tried this but RevTeX4.1 was
issued in August 2010 and the announcement refers mostly to bugfixes and
additional
ok, thanks for the info. unless Vincent put it in, i will do before
beta goes out.
I looked at the patch again and in the Qt Docs and I read:
{{{
void QClipboard::dataChanged () [signal]
This signal is emitted when the clipboard data is changed.
On Mac OS X and with Qt version 4.3 or
A. Am Freitag, den 22.10.2010, 22:34 +0200 schrieb Vincent van
Ravesteijn:
Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
to post one later.
BH
I think the culprit might be in this
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
the most problematic cases of our copypaste typically happen when
middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another
applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno whether
Am Freitag, den 22.10.2010, 13:28 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck:
i wonder why Alert:: code is affected when no preview or export is done?
It was a bug in InGuiThread.h, see commit message:
bind makes a copy of the arguments by default. This is secure if the
bound object survives the existence of
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
Yet another question.
If you normally would reconfigure LyX, you get a message like Running
configure... in the status bar. Then you know you have to wait.
What do you expect on Mac if you don't have any window open
Hi Gregory,
1) I have a patch set for 1.6.X which will no longer apply because Vincent
(vfr) already contributed an alternative. I presume that I need to modify
my patch to layer on top of his.
Actually, I wouldn't say I contributed an alternative. I just put in
your idea but implemented
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:
Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
to
On 2010-10-21, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > but now we have new problem - how to notice user that exporting is
Am 22.10.2010 um 01:07 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
If the principle way is ok I can do the same for the RCS and SVN backend
too.
One question regarding the "View log" button of repoUpdate:
here on Mac the dialog to display the log is unusable.
It
Le 22/10/2010 02:10, uwesto...@lyx.org a écrit :
Log:
- lyxsweave.R: set missing SVN EOL style and add missing makefile entry
- lib/Makefile.am: add missing scripts
Thanks, Uwe.
JMarc
On 10/22/2010 03:25 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#6710: table dialog broken
--+-
Reporter: uwestoehr |Owner: nob...@…
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: high |
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> this thinko-part smells like trunk stuff unless it really fixes something.
It really fixes something. If you drop file a.tex and b.tex onto LyX, current
LyX tries to import a.tex twice, and b.tex not at all. The fix assures that
both a.tex and b.tex are imported (and only
> // Asynchronously post the event. DropEvent usually come
> // from the BufferView. But reloading a file might close
> // the BufferView from within its own event handler.
>- guiApp->dispatchDelayed(cmd);
>+ guiApp->addtoFuncRequestQueue(cmd);
>
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > // Asynchronously post the event. DropEvent usually come
> > // from the BufferView. But reloading a file might close
> > // the BufferView from within its own event handler.
> >
> >- guiApp->dispatchDelayed(cmd);
> >+
>> One remark: I refactored the buffer reloading, so I don't think it is
>> still true that a BufferView can close itself now on reloading.
>
> So you think I can just ditch the comment? (Actually, it's also not posted
> asynchronously anymore, unless I do my second proposed change).
>
> Jürgen
>
Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages.
>
> greyed out (or otherwise modified) export toolbar buttons?
wont help in case you use only menu.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I think you can. However, I can't judge right now whether it's better
> to do it asynchronously or not. So, it might be that we should still
> do it asynchronously, but the reasoning stated in the comment is not
> valid anymore.
I propose the following patch (diff
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> I think you can. However, I can't judge right now whether it's better
>> to do it asynchronously or not. So, it might be that we should still
>> do it asynchronously, but the reasoning
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Only three nitpicks:
>
> - There will be some point in time that I will start wondering what
> the difference is between processing the queue and performing the
> requests. Then I'll find out that they do the same thing but that the
> only difference is that
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> since it's not only used in GuiApplication itself.
not > now
Jürgen
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Fri Oct 22 01:10:02 2010
> New Revision: 35765
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35765
>
> Log:
> Allow newer autoconf
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/autogen.sh
>lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/status.16x
>
> Modified:
Le 22/10/2010 14:21, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
trunk does not show this behaviour. JMarc, do you have idea?
Branch uses libtool, trunk does not. I fear that using recent autoconf
means switching to libtool 2. See for example this mail:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/ac/msg10004.html
Am 22.10.2010 um 02:11 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I made a new patch to implement getDiff() and use it to avoid the query for
>> log message
>> before checkIn() is done and the confirmation on revert when no diff is
>> found.
>
> thanks for your patience, i went closely
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Branch uses libtool, trunk does not. I fear that using recent autoconf
> means switching to libtool 2. See for example this mail:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/ac/msg10004.html
ok, so i'll revert this patch.
pavel
Am 22.10.2010 um 14:53 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 22/10/2010 14:21, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> trunk does not show this behaviour. JMarc, do you have idea?
>
> Branch uses libtool, trunk does not. I fear that using recent autoconf means
> switching to libtool 2. See for example this mail:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no log message)
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx
i looked why lyx ignored my
On 10/21/2010 07:17 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages.
Op 22 okt 2010 01:13 schreef "Pavel Sanda" >:
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20...
i
Am 22.10.2010 um 15:28 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 22.10.2010 um 02:11 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -212,8 +213,9 @@
>>> docstring text = bformat(_("Reverting to the stored version of the "
>>> "document %1$s will lose all current
>>>
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> sa...@lyx.org wrote:
>>
>>> Author: sanda
>>> Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
>>> New Revision: 35767
>>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> (no log message)
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
Richard Heck wrote:
> Along these same lines, I wonder if we should pop up an info box when
> the export is done. If it takes a while, then the user may not notice the
> status message, and those get over-written quickly, anyway.
>
> In a way, that would solve this issue: It's still going until
Am 22.10.2010 um 15:28 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 22.10.2010 um 02:11 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
> While doing some "stress test" with checkIn() I found the error message when
> merge is needed
> "Something's wrong with cvs commit" not acceptable. Then I tried to change
>
i suppose for the same reason that we cannot have a pointing finger
when the mouse hovers something clickable...
On 2010-10-22, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Along these same lines, I wonder if we should pop up an info box when
>> the export is done. If it takes a
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > the error case is suspicious. if tempName fails or "cvs diff" fails how you
> > detect
> > this on a higher stage? cmiiw but if something fails you identify it with
> > having
> > empty diff, which looks wrong, even more if you release lock automatically
> > in such
> >
Jurgen,
Because I love to nitpick:
+void GuiApplication::processFuncRequestQueueAsync()
+{
+ // We perform the events asynchronously. This prevents potential
+ // problems in case the BufferView is closed within an event.
Well, this comment is not in the right position after all.
While eating I thought of more.
>I moved the functions to another place in the header and made
>dispatchDelayed a private function, since it's now only used in
>GuiApplication itself.
I think it's better to make it public anyway.
- the fact whether a function is public or private should be
On 10/22/2010 10:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no log message)
Modified:
On 10/22/2010 01:01 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/22/2010 10:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/21/2010 07:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010
New Revision: 35767
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767
Log:
(no
This patch got buried when I was distracted by my thesis. Apologies
for the delay.
I address the comments to the previous patch.
Notes:
1) The potential security issue has been addressed by only using LyX's viewers.
2) Richard suggested that I regenerate the filename/url on demand, I
discuss why
Hi,
Can someone on a Mac test the following ?
- open LyX
- open a document
- save a bookmark
- close the document and make sure you don't have any views left
- try to navigate to the bookmark
Does LyX now assert ?
Thanks,
Vincent
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone on a Mac test the following ?
>
> - open LyX
> - open a document
> - save a bookmark
> - close the document and make sure you don't have any views left
> - try to navigate to the bookmark
>
> Does
> Nope -- it works fine for me with near current svn (built yesterday).
>
> BH
>
Thanks.
But it is strange as I see this code:
"void GuiApplication::gotoBookmark(unsigned int idx, bool openFile,
bool switchToBuffer)
{
LASSERT(current_view_);
}
I don't understand this. On a Mac you
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Nope -- it works fine for me with near current svn (built yesterday).
>>
>> BH
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> But it is strange as I see this code:
>
> "void GuiApplication::gotoBookmark(unsigned int idx, bool openFile,
> bool
> Sorry -- I had other windows open. If I close everything else, and
> then try navigating to a bookmark, I get an error "beep" and nothing
> else happens.
That must be the assert then.
>Moreover -- something I hadn't noticed before -- if all
> windows are closed, it's not possible to open a new
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Sorry -- I had other windows open. If I close everything else, and
>> then try navigating to a bookmark, I get an error "beep" and nothing
>> else happens.
>
> That must be the assert then.
No. It's just the OS's
Yet another question.
If you normally would reconfigure LyX, you get a message like "Running
configure..." in the status bar. Then you know you have to wait.
What do you expect on Mac if you don't have any window open ? Now,
there is no way of telling that configure is running, right ?
Do you
Yet another question.
If you normally would reconfigure LyX, you get a message like "Running
configure..." in the status bar. Then you know you have to wait.
What do you expect on Mac if you don't have any window open ? Now,
there is no way of telling that configure is running, right ?
Do you
> Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
> don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
> to post one later.
>
> BH
>
I think the culprit might be in this code:
void GuiApplication::processKeySym(KeySymbol const & keysym, KeyModifier state)
{
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
>> don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
>> to post one later.
>>
>> BH
>>
I fixed a number of problems that might
Hi Pavel
Thanks. Will do.
I will change to 2.0 - Uwe has just made the same suggestion. The way I have
worked in the past was because that was the instruction in the Help files when
I first began submitting changes occasionally some years ago.
John
--
On Friday 22 October 2010 20:08:50 you
John R Hudson wrote:
> Hi Pavel
>
> Thanks. Will do.
>
> I will change to 2.0 - Uwe has just made the same suggestion. The way I have
> worked in the past was because that was the instruction in the Help files
> when
> I first began submitting changes occasionally some years ago.
btw are you
On 22/10/2010 4:15 PM, John R Hudson wrote:
5.19 RevTeX4
> > [paragraph 1]The Revtex 4 textclass works with the American Physical
> > Sociey's RevTeX 4.1 class. [I haven't tried this but RevTeX4.1 was
> > issued in August 2010 and the announcement refers mostly to bugfixes and
> >
> ok, thanks for the info. unless Vincent put it in, i will do before
> beta goes out.
>
I looked at the patch again and in the Qt Docs and I read:
{{{
void QClipboard::dataChanged () [signal]
This signal is emitted when the clipboard data is changed.
On Mac OS X and with Qt version 4.3 or
A. Am Freitag, den 22.10.2010, 22:34 +0200 schrieb Vincent van
Ravesteijn:
> > Incidentally, in testing all this, I had LyX crash on me twice. I
> > don't have time now to get a backtrace, but let me know if you want me
> > to post one later.
> >
> > BH
> >
>
> I think the culprit
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> > > the most problematic cases of our copy typically happen when
> > > middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another
> > > applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno
Am Freitag, den 22.10.2010, 13:28 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck:
> >> i wonder why Alert:: code is affected when no preview or export is done?
It was a bug in InGuiThread.h, see commit message:
"bind makes a copy of the arguments by default. This is secure if the
bound object survives the existence
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Yet another question.
>
> If you normally would reconfigure LyX, you get a message like "Running
> configure..." in the status bar. Then you know you have to wait.
>
> What do you expect on Mac if you don't have any
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo