On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:49:34PM +0100, Sam Lewis wrote:
Hi Sam,
I've moved a 1.5rc2 binary for ubuntu dapper to incoming ftp.lyx.org.
Could someone please place in the appropriate folder. Many thanks!
I don't like to bother other people with licence issue but there's no
diff.gz avaible so
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Sven == Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:49:34PM +0100, Sam Lewis wrote:
Sven Hi Sam,
I've moved a 1.5rc2 binary for ubuntu dapper to incoming
ftp.lyx.org. Could someone please
Hi,
while preparing a Debian package for the upcoming 1.5 release I've
experienced a huge performance problem with 1.5rc1. Now I tried to find a
reason and had to find out that the current trunk will segfault when I build
it with the boost libs provided in the Debian archive.
I don't know if
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:18:03AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
while preparing a Debian package for the upcoming 1.5 release I've
experienced a huge performance problem with 1.5rc1. Now I tried to find a
reason and had to find out that the current trunk
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Hi,
Yes, this could be. We should simply NOT use the static solution.
Does attached patch work on Debian? If yes we could remove BugfixSignal, and
create the signal at runtime. But we then have to clean up correctly.
Ok I tried
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:48:08PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Hi,
Yes, this could be. We should simply NOT use the static solution.
Does attached patch work on Debian? If yes we could remove BugfixSignal, and
create
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:53:28PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Hi,
is there any automated script to build a .deb package for LyX ?
Well you can always check out the debian directory from the pkg-lyx
svn on alioth and use that to build with dpkg-buildpackage and related
tools.
Hi,
we've had some arguments about the fact that we turned assertions on
in the LyX Debian package. ATM we're rethinking our position and I
would like to get some input from you on the topic.
The main argument for turning assertions on is that in cases of an
assertion getting cought the chance
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:23:55PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I'm wondering if it does not pick the wrong moc. On Debian, moc is called
moc-qt4
Why is it so? Is there a moc-qt3?
Yes and a symlink moc managed via update-alternatives pointing to the
current Debian default.
Yes sometimes Debian is
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:17:39PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SW.nobackup/BRANCH_1_4_X$ ./autogen.sh
Using automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6
Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60a
This autoconf version is not supported by LyX.
LyX only supports autoconf 2.5[2-9].
[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:45:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Well I can build you one if you really need. But the diff you need
is rather simple.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyxreborn$ diff -u lyx-1.4.3svn/autogen.sh
lyx-1.4.2+1.4.3svn20060915/autogen.sh
--- lyx-1.4.3svn
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 07:33:40PM -0400, Mark Carroll wrote:
Hello Mark, hello *,
I'm not sure if there is still someone interested in fixing bugs in the
xforms frontend. I'd suggest you to try out the qt frontend by installing
the lyx-qt package.
Moreover I'm forwarding this bug to the
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:54:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hi,
BTW, how comes that lyx on debian triggers assertions? Do you keep them
on intentionally?
s/intentionally/historically/ would be the better term. As far as I can travel
back in our svn they've been always enabled.
Hi,
attached you can find a diff against the 1.4.x branch where I started to
update the FSF postal address.
I also updated the LyX-Team copyright up to 2006 if you disagree remove this
change and please list the current copyright holders.
What's missing is the translation update for the address.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:12:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Sven == Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Sven What's missing is the translation update for the address. I
Sven didn't touch the po files because I'm not sure how to handle
Sven them correctly without messing
Hi guys,
I hope that this one is not something like a well known bug. At least I could
not find a fitting but in the Bugzilla yet but aehm well it's quite hard to
find something without reading a few hundred bugreports ...
If I do the following with LyX 1.4.3:
touch foo.lyx
lyx-qt
File-New
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 03:22:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Sven == Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven What's missing is the translation update for the address. I
Sven didn't touch the po files because I'm not sure how to handle
Sven them correctly without messing things
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:51:01AM +, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 1:37 pm, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi guys,
here is a patch proposal for the FSF address change
needed in the /po/*.po files including a translation for
the de.po file.
Is it wise for us to translate
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:30:04PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
To be honest I'm still unsure if this is a good way to handle the
translations. I donno how you worked with changes of translated text
in the past.
The standard way: Change the original text and let
Hello,
I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
upstream version.
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project on
alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned state
but just not marked beeing O. The other former
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hello Georg,
Wow that's a fast reply :)
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned
state but just
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
and made
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:58:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
Not yet. At the moment it's still 4.0.3
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:12:43PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
NOTE: I think it's getting quite off-topic here. IMHO wie should move
the package related discussion to this mailinglist:
http
Hello *,
there is a patch in the current LyX Debian package adding a note to
de_Extended.lyx that there is htlatex as a fourth tool avaible
to create a html export. Grep'ing through the 1.4.2svn code I found that
configure.py seems to have some detection routines for htlatex.
If htlatex is
Hi *,
here is another patch I've found in the Debian LyX package you maybe
would like to apply to the LyX source tree.
In manpages all - should be escaped with \- to force a proper handling.
The attached patch has been created against the current 1.4.x branch.
Sven
--
If you won't forgive me
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 03:38:24PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There are other man pages:
fantomas: find -name \*man
./src/client/lyxclient.man
Patch attached.
./src/tex2lyx/tex2lyx.man
Ok.
./development/lyxsocket/lyxclient.man
Patch attached.
Hello guys,
while working through the Debian BTS I've found a wishlist bug with a patch
attached to make use of the Metakey within LyX. I donno if you like the patch
nor if it's correct.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344147
---cut--
When using the Emacs
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
1.4.2, and we should move to other goals. Note that updated 1.4.2
installers can be released from the same code base.
So, what shall we do?
IMO release now. The number of fixes is impressive,
Hi guys,
I'm forwarding this bug to you reported by a LyX user through the
Debian BTS.
You can find the original bugreport here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379747
---quote from the bugreport--
I'm writing all my letters with lyx (thanks for providing it!),
Hi,
if you export a document with footnotes to ascii the handling still
suboptimal.
If you've a a construction like
This is a first sentence[And here is a footnote.].
The export will look like:
cut--
This is a first sentence
And here is a footnote.
.
cut--
You can see
Hi,
if you export a letter to ascii the signature field is placed on top
of the text so that it looks like this:
cut-
My Name
My Street
My Town
Send To Name
Send To Street
Send To Town
Your signature
Dear ...
Text of Your Letter. To create a real letter, just
replace erase
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:04:06PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Sunday 30 July 2006 14:29, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
if you export a document with footnotes to ascii the handling still
suboptimal.
If you've a a construction like
This is a first sentence[And here is a footnote
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Sunday 30 July 2006 14:42, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Reported in this bug report against the Debian package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=198380
Like in the previous bug we can either fix that in text output
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:03:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hello Jean-Marc, hello *,
There is no reason why we should not reconfigure in batch mode.
Comments? I plan to apply soon.
Ok I'll comment a little bit about how this issue was found and what problems
might be related.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:48:27AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc? I think it would simplify the code if we get
Abdelrazak rid of them...
You mean removing them in 1.5, right?
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:45:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:20:26PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
The Debian package has a bugreport about ispell problems. It seems to try
to select the wrong dictionary for the enviroment.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
Hi,
since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of
tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex.
[ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ??
AFAIK LyX works
Hi,
we've still two patches in the Debian package for LyX 1.5.2 you might
be interested in.
05.configure.py_prog_prefer is mostly about adding xdg-open/sensible-editor
as the first option in configure.py.
Documentation for xdg-open: http://jbot.de/BdoaD
Patch in the pkg-lyx svn:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:17:16AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:14:51PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi Andre,
05.configure.py_prog_prefer is mostly about adding xdg-open/sensible-editor
as the first option in configure.py.
I've never seen 'sensible-editor' so far
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Hi,
we've still two patches in the Debian package for LyX 1.5.2 you might
be interested in.
05.configure.py_prog_prefer is mostly about adding
xdg-open/sensible-editor as the first option
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
Some news on those small modifications? Are you going to commit them for
1.5.3 and 1.6?
I'll leave this to somebody else. I'm currently busy enough with other stuff.
Ok.
Is someone else
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
Developers, please let me know if you have pending patches;
I have the two following patches in my tree.
- last.diff is just documenting the fact that last files are not
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:45:14AM -0500, rgheck wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
xdg-open is supposed just to open whatever viewer you have defined for
the relevant file type. If you're not using one of the desktops for which
it is defined (KDE, Gnome, XFCE) and, moreover, don't have mimeopen
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:14:43PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
We've been using xdg-open as the first choice for the Debian packages and
subsequently the Ubuntu packages for over a year now and didn't receive such
a problem report so I suspect that it makes more sense to fix the broken
setup instead
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:36:50PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
If it's really too much pain to fix xdg-open then I've to agree that it
would make more sense to revert the change.
have you some experience how much are xdg devs communicative about the
run-mailcap
thing ?
Nope but I've
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:15:32AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
they should configure it properly. If they don't want to use xdg-open,
then get rid of xdg-utils and LyX configure will pick the next possible
viewer...
you can not rid of xdg-utils simply - they are in dependencies of
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
What about something like this:
cp -a /var /home/var
umount /var
ln -s /home/var /var
uhh.. when the server apps are running? what about the open files; i'm not
sure
everything is regular file so you
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:22:56PM +0100, Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hi to whomever I am writing right now,
I would like to download a development version of LyX 1.6.0. but wasn't able
to find an according download link for it. So, could you please provide me
with the location where I can get the
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:54:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The machine (Athlon 2000+) has been bought from the project's fund and
from time to time Lars asks on lyx-users whether somebody could renew
the lyx.org name. That is all
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:22:02PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
I noticed/suspected too that you were browsing trac at the time where
the
bump happened on the graph. Do you use rss feeds?
No, I just browsed it with a plain web browser (konqueror). I used nothing
but the standard
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:27:13PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
watch out, the real fun starts right now.
Can you tell me at what time it started?
cat ~sanda/log
first offense seems to be around 10am today.
btw i dont think that just restart is the way how to solve it.
there must be
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Can we do that without reinstalling a newer linux distribution?
Why not upgrading to the latest Fedora by the way? I guess (hope) that
Fedora provide easy upgrade without the need to reinstall,
[Notice: lyx-devel is subscribers only so if you dislike to receive any
held for moderation notice etc. just kick it and I'll forward mails if needed]
Hi,
with Qt 4.4.0rc1-2 hitting unstable we noticed that LyX fails badly. I've
no clue if it's a problem of LyX with the new Qt version or a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Abdel,
It seems that setting a message triggers a draw of the working area with
4.4. So, as it is not safe to do anything inside the paint event that
triggers another paint event, this patch fixes the crash.
Yay!
Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
Hi,
i am a mandriva contributor and i would like to see this bug fixed for us
to.
would it be possible to obtain that patch please ?
you can always take a look at our packaging/patches in the svn repo here:
Hi Julien, hi Cengiz,
ok you might wonder why I'm mailing you so here's the story:
Cengiz Gunay modified your bash_completion file for inkscape to work with
LyX and submitted it for inclusion in the Debian package.[1]
I picked it up and added it to the Debian LyX package and proposed it upstream
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:31:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi Pavel,
i see some response in bugzilla. i'm not sure whats the status for such kind
of contributed
stuff. do we need blanket permission for inclusion in the tarball?
[2] http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4753
You have
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
You have one now. If you need it or not. ;) It's at least clear now that
other packagers
are safe to pick the file up and distribute it if they think it's usefull.
i'm no legal expert, but don't you need
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:48:21PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
On 03/18/2010 05:45 PM, venom00 wrote:
Hi! Why don't you create a IRC chan for quick discussions? It would be very
interesting! Maybe on Freenode.
Let me know!
Do you know how to create such a thing? If so, please do, and then
post
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
I have debian lenny with g++ 4.3.2, qt 4.6.2.
Usually, you use a different run-time version of Qt as the
one you used in the compilation.
Vincent
I have only one qt installed.
Since Debian/Lenny shipped with Qt
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:27:17AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 14:37:24 Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
anybody already using python 3 with lyx?
what is the situation with different distros and our compatibility with 3?
(gentoo has 3(.1) still in testing but slowly moving
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Maybe, I don't understand this well enough, but anyway, why do we
require automake 1.10.1 for everyone ? Even for people not using make
dist or the tarball at all.
automake 1.10.1 will fail
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I've put the tarballs here:
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.bz2
Please test, build, report back.
Build and seems to work with my
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Hi,
Please keep branch in freeze until we know 1.6.6 is OK.
Oh and lintian again found a common misspelling in the source ...
Maybe you'd like to apply this for 1.6.7.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:09PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi,
Can you please report this as LyX bug?
Done:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6708
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
Hi,
this is so wide spread that I hesitate to sent a patch.
I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible
I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible
It's even in a file name src/insets/InsetCollapsable.cpp.
Is someone interested to fix
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
We can go on ...
Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this
time ...) so far.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 08:23:21PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:10:55PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi Enrico,
I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible
I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
Hi,
Any idea what might have happened?
I guess I should've forwarded
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332
but I never found a way to reproduce it. :(
And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Brendon Higgins wrote:
Hi,
I currently fail to help with debugging this problem any further so maybe
someone here has an idea how to proceed.
Summary:
Export options only appear when reconfigure just ran and LyX got restarted.
After a second restart
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:47:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/05/2010 12:06 PM, Andrei Lomov wrote:
I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze.
No success, ./configure returns
You've got the qt4-devel package installed, right? Dumb question,
I'm sure,
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:35:32PM +0300, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Andrei Lomov lo...@math.nsc.ru wrote:
I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze.
No success, ./configure returns
** qt 4 library not found !
Did you try
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:06:25PM +0700, Andrei Lomov wrote:
May be anywhere is the binary i686 LyX 1.5.7 (statically linked)?
Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from
Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a
Xen domU with
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:09:03PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from
Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a
Xen domU with -static. (sounds scary? yes it is!)
Hm passing -static via CXXFLAGS
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:18:57AM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
likely to keep these here for a short time:
http://feanor.sssup.it/~tommaso/lyx/
I hacked very quickly debian/changelog (renamed last
commit by somebody from 1.5.6 to 1.6.0) and deps in
debian/control (was depending on
Hi,
this one is very small for the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ LANG=C man --warnings -l lyx-unfixed.1 /dev/null
standard input:125: warning: `Sp' not defined
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ diff -ur lyx-unfixed.1 lyx.1
--- lyx-unfixed.1 2008-11-09 20:22:42.0 +0100
+++ lyx.1
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 06:00:40PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
Can you send this as an attachment?
Sure. Now diffed against the proper lyx.1in file.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
Index: lyx-1.6.0/lyx.1in
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:35:22PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Sure. Now diffed against the proper lyx.1in file.
It's in (1.5.7 and 1.6.1).
Thanks.
Sven
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 06:44:18PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Moin,
Ok I've prepared 1.6.0 in our repository but I've no answer so far from Per
(mailed him on Friday) so I don't think we'll make it in time. I don't know
if Per is on holiday or just away for the weekend so it can take from
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:30:14PM +, José Matos wrote:
Hi guys,
This way we would have binary packages for the users to try when they
read
the announce. Larger projects follow this scheme and I would like to give it
a
try this time.
I intend to release the announce
Hi,
currently make install creates an empty directory share/lyx/images/commands.
Is this done by intention or just something left over or should there be
some files in there?
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:51:25AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
currently make install creates an empty directory share/lyx/images/commands.
Is this done by intention or just something left over or should there be
some files
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:43:45PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It is intended. This is where we can define icons for user-defined
commands.
Hm user-defined stuff in /usr sounds like a bad idea to me but I guess
this is only a missunderstanding of the idea on my side.
OK, I was not
Hi,
donno if you care about not yet released GCC versions but the Debian
QA people do.
Sven
- Forwarded message from Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:59:20 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel]
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:07:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Pavel Sanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
donno if you care about not yet released GCC versions but the Debian
QA people do.
its in.
And we _do_ appreciate patches coming for unreleased gcc
Hi,
attached is a small patch to set the comments right in the tex2lyx manpage.
With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed.
$ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 /dev/null
standard input:43: warning: `Tr' not defined
standard input:584: warning: `IX' not defined
For
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:16:30PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
attached is a small patch to set the comments right in the tex2lyx manpage.
I'm happy to commit this, but someone who actually knows about this
should have a quick look first.
Ok. If you look through
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:03:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de writes:
Hi,
With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed.
$ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 /dev/null
standard input:43: warning: `Tr' not defined
standard
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
Sven, have you looked on it again or should we put the original patch
into the tree?
Nope sorry. If you like you can put in the original patch or just let it be.
I'll rewrite/reformat the whole thing when I've some spare time.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:22:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Hi,
| I need to upgrade that server to Centos 5.2, but once that's done
You are aware that Centos 5.3 will be out in a couple of weeks?
In almost all cases that will be a rather smooth upgrade. I've some RHEL 5
here
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes:
Hi,
In this respect, I'd favor hosting from free software projects like
alioth (debian), launchpad (ubuntu,although this is a company) or
savannah (GNU).
Alioth is strictly
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:56:06AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
Hi,
My favourite is berlios.de, an advertisement-free, clean open-source
forge with bug-tracking, GIT and other tools (see
http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=26group_id=2
for details).
AFAIK Joerg Schilling
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Hi Juergen,
LyX 1.6.2 is here:
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable
Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your
system?
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your
system?
I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be
sufficient?
Sure. Thanks.
Now I just need to meet you
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hi,
No point in wasting effort if all you where objecting like mad...
Not that I'm objecting in any way but I guess that all old links to
the bugreports will break or is there some mod_rewrite voodoo possible
to retain the
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:13:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 15/03/2009 11:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to
you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Bad. But fair enough for the moment.
Just
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:52:09AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-04-29, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi,
For Linux distributions this would mean a recommendation or
suggestion in the lyx package. (Hopefully there will be an elyxer
Debian package soon.)
These terms (recommends and suggests)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Hi,
I learned that Sven Hoexter has already a workaround, so I believe it can
wait for 1.6.4.
I'm just adding the -mt suffix in all .in and the common.am file. This
doesn't ensure any portability it just keeps it building
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23:56PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
I don't know what other distributions currently do with relation to the
boost
changes. At least Fedora seems to provide the single threaded version with
the old naming and the multi threaded version
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
