Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 24/05/2016 23:37, Pavel Sanda a écrit : I only tried 2.2, so I did not really compare. I do not have 2.0 here. I can try to have a look at 2.1 vs 2.2 later. >>> >>> Please try, we should see whether the problem is reproducible at all... >> >> Since you

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 24/05/2016 23:37, Pavel Sanda a écrit : I only tried 2.2, so I did not really compare. I do not have 2.0 here. I can try to have a look at 2.1 vs 2.2 later. Please try, we should see whether the problem is reproducible at all... Since you were asking in different thread, ping :) When I

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 12/01/2016 10:15, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > More important is - can you reproduce the behaviour? It's pretty clear > on my > machine without trying any special conditions, just high repeat rate

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/01/2016 10:59, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> I reproduce the svg you sent for 2.2, since it is not so large either :) >> >> More important is - can you reproduce the behaviour? It's pretty clear on my >> machine without trying any

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 12/01/2016 10:15, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: More important is - can you reproduce the behaviour? It's pretty clear on my machine without trying any special conditions, just high repeat rate of the keyboard is needed. I only tried 2.2, so I did not really compare. I

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/01/2016 10:15, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: More important is - can you reproduce the behaviour? It's pretty clear on my machine without trying any special conditions, just high repeat rate of the keyboard is

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/01/2016 06:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> The way to reproduce: >> my keyboard autorepeat: >> 1.xset r rate 300 180 >> 2. launch lyx & tutorial & fullscreen >> 3. hold right arrow key until you get to the end of the >> first page and then left arrow until you

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 11/01/2016 10:59, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I reproduce the svg you sent for 2.2, since it is not so large either :) More important is - can you reproduce the behaviour? It's pretty clear on my machine without trying any special conditions, just high repeat rate of

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On 01/11/2016 05:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > At some time, I convinced my self that there is as much time spent in > toolbar updates than in painting itself. The reason is (would be) that > it uses BufferParams::isExportable which does a full graph search in > converters for each icon

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 11/01/2016 18:12, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/11/2016 05:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: At some time, I convinced my self that there is as much time spent in toolbar updates than in painting itself. The reason is (would be) that it uses BufferParams::isExportable which does a full

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >Sadly, moving cursor in paragraph is considerably slower than > >in my current 2.0 build :( > > And how does this compare to a 2.1 build? > > Could you provide a profile log for 2.2 being slow? Ok, I made two profiles for sysprof. The way to reproduce: my

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:03:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:55:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I thin that gcc5 does not work with --disable-cxx11-mode. But I did not have > > time to look at it more closely. > > Good to know. I just tested with gcc

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 03/01/2016 10:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I thin that gcc5 does not work with --disable-cxx11-mode. But I did not have time to look at it more closely. Good to know. I just tested with gcc 5.1.1-4 and the compilation went fine. 'make check' passed. 'make distcheck' did not but that is

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Montag, 16. November 2015 um 20:25:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:49:02AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > >If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > > >it

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 10:32:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 16. November 2015 um 20:25:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:49:02AM +0100, Uwe

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 17/11/2015 16:32, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : The following command exits without error for me: ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre --enable-monolithic-build=yes && make Is there another make target I should check? Do you tun "make distcheck" too? (this is unrelated to

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:55:03PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 10:32:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > Is it with autotools really compiling everything? > > > Or only files to be installed? > > > > The following command exits without error

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 16. November 2015 um 20:25:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:49:02AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > > >If you have

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 17/11/2015 16:32, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >The following command exits without error for me: > > > >./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre > >--enable-monolithic-build=yes && make > > > >Is there another

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am 17.11.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Kornel Benko: OK, cmake should now work. Many thanks Kornel. Works now for me. regards Uwe

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:55:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 17/11/15 17:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>Le 17/11/2015 16:32, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >>>The following command exits without error for me: >

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Kornel Benko wrote: > Now the problem is linking of lyxclient ... > cd /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQtlocal/src/client && /usr/bin/cmake -E > cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/lyxclient2.2.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 > /usr/bin/c++ -Wall -Wunused-parameter --std=c++11 -fno-strict-aliasing > -Wall

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 10:32:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > >> > Is it with autotools really compiling everything? >> > Or only files to be installed? >> >> The following

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 20:31:59, schrieb Georg Baum > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 10:32:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> > > >> >

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Kornel Benko wrote: > OK, cmake should now work. Thanks, it works fine now! Georg

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 20:55:15, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 20:31:59, schrieb Georg Baum > > > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 um 10:32:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 17/11/15 17:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 17/11/2015 16:32, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : The following command exits without error for me: ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre --enable-monolithic-build=yes

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 15/11/2015 03:14, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Pavel Sanda wrote: non harmful, but warnings: Apart from that I was able to build and run it on gentoo system. Sadly, moving cursor in paragraph is considerably slower than in my current 2.0 build :( Could it be related to the following ticket?

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > Dear all, > > > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > > it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: > > > >

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:03PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/16/2015 05:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am > > 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> If you have time,

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On 11/16/2015 05:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am > 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that >>> it

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am 16.11.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:03PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 05:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am >>> 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am 17.11.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:01:16AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 16.11.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:03PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/16/2015 05:39

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that it compiles/installs as expected. It compiles but not as merged build. With -DLYX_MERGE_REBUILD=1 -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1 I get 40 errors, most of them due to a problem with

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:03:21AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 17.11.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > > Am 17.11.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:01:16AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > >>> Am 16.11.2015 um

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:01:16AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 16.11.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:03PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 11/16/2015 05:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59:09AM

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am 17.11.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Stephan Witt : > Am 17.11.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:01:16AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 16.11.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >>> On Mon, Nov 16,

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:49:02AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > >it compiles/installs as expected. > > It compiles but not as merged build. With > > -DLYX_MERGE_REBUILD=1

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > Dear all, > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha1/ > > Also if you can,

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Sonntag 15 November 2015, 14:44:40 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Cmake build: Using '-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=ON' I get this error: > > [ 46%] Building CXX object > src/support/CMakeFiles/support.dir/_allinone_const.C.o cd > /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQtlocal/src/support && /usr/bin/c++ >

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Sonntag 15 November 2015, 16:16:35 schrieb Kornel Benko: > It does, in this case. But as the compilation proceeds, I get lot of errors > and warnings. Is the attached too big for list? That's at least definitely too much for my agenda. Let's see first if we can get monolithic build working

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Sonntag, 15. November 2015 um 14:30:21, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Am Samstag 14 November 2015, 21:34:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 04:31:55PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > If you have time,

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 15/11/2015 01:18, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Scott Kostyshak wrote: Dear all, If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: non harmful, but warnings: GuiViewSource.cpp:174:9: warning: 'QString

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Am Samstag 14 November 2015, 21:34:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 04:31:55PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > > > > > it compiles/installs as expected.

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > And how does this compare to a 2.1 build? 2.1 seems to be the same as 2.0. > Could you provide a profile log for 2.2 being slow? Not now, but i will try get to it, it's pretty annoying. BTW my defaults are: xset r rate 300 180 maybe you can see it with this

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Same Qt version? Yes, 4.8.5. P

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > This probably points to > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/7f1d33efc1d0b4302875706ba85d42c2a8f35a67/lyxgit/ > > Please try the attached patch. Yep, this fixes it. Pavel

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Le 15/11/2015 03:14, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Pavel Sanda wrote: non harmful, but warnings: Apart from that I was able to build and run it on gentoo system. Sadly, moving cursor in paragraph is considerably slower than in my current 2.0 build :( And how does this compare to a 2.1 build?

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Works fine here (Debian jessie). Georg

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 04:31:55PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > > it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: > > Monolithic build seems to be broken: I can reproduce

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Pavel Sanda wrote: > non harmful, but warnings: Apart from that I was able to build and run it on gentoo system. Sadly, moving cursor in paragraph is considerably slower than in my current 2.0 build :( Pavel

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 06:14:44PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > non harmful, but warnings: > > Apart from that I was able to build and run it on gentoo system. > > Sadly, moving cursor in paragraph is considerably slower than > in my current 2.0 build :( Same Qt version?

Basic test of alpha1 tar

Dear all, If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha1/ Also if you can, please check that it verifies correctly. This is my first time signing a tar ball.

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Also if you can, please check that it verifies correctly. This is my > first time signing a tar ball. Sigs are correct. P

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: Monolithic build seems to be broken: In file included from liblyxqt4.cpp:27:0: GuiCharacter.cpp: In function 'bool

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: non harmful, but warnings: GuiViewSource.cpp:174:9: warning: 'QString lyx::frontend::{anonymous}::prependTexRow(const