Why not do this the way the figure sizing is done? A set of radio
buttons with in, cm, pt, %textwidth (or %columnwidth), and a type-in for
the number. I'll grant you this takes up a lot of space, but that's a
question of form design. Also, it might be sensible to have a separate
pop-up
>
> Why not do this the way the figure sizing is done? A set of radio
> buttons with in, cm, pt, %textwidth (or %columnwidth), and a type-in for
> the number. I'll grant you this takes up a lot of space, but that's a
> question of form design. Also, it might be sensible to have a separate
>
Juergen Vigna wrote:
Hi Stephan!
Yes, I don't need WYSIWYM too. Normally it is irrelevant
where the linebreak inside the cell text occurs if the cell
width is given.
You'll see that in the new tabular-inset I already have a WYSIWYM view
of the tabular and you're also able to
Stephan Witt wrote:
Stephan But what I missed is the possiblity to enter expressions
Stephan as column width like 0.2\textwidth. This is sometimes more
Stephan convinient then absolute column width.
Juergen Yes this may be convenient, but then I'm not able anymore to
check the
Juergen
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Hi Stephan!
>
> >
> > Yes, I don't need WYSIWYM too. Normally it is irrelevant
> > where the linebreak inside the cell text occurs if the cell
> > width is given.
> >
>
> You'll see that in the new tabular-inset I already have a WYSIWYM view
> of the tabular and you're
Stephan Witt wrote:
>
Stephan > But what I missed is the possiblity to enter expressions
Stephan > as column width like 0.2\textwidth. This is sometimes more
Stephan > convinient then absolute column width.
Juergen > Yes this may be convenient, but then I'm not able anymore to
check the
Juergen
On 16-Jun-2000 Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
Is there any idea when we might get visual feedback to the
"size" attribute for table cells? Or even a horizontal scrollbar when
tables go off-screen? Currently editing tables is virtually impossible.
Well you always can use Ctrl-Enter to split
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 16-Jun-2000 Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
Is there any idea when we might get visual feedback to the
"size" attribute for table cells? Or even a horizontal scrollbar when
tables go off-screen? Currently editing tables is virtually impossible.
On 19-Jun-2000 Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
Well you always can use Ctrl-Enter to split rows up into more virtural
rows and so it don't get so wide.
Ah, but this is really quite a hack and doesn't do what I want. There's
no text justification and I still have to try and work out what's going
On 16-Jun-2000 Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
>
> Is there any idea when we might get visual feedback to the
> "size" attribute for table cells? Or even a horizontal scrollbar when
> tables go off-screen? Currently editing tables is virtually impossible.
>
Well you always can use Ctrl-Enter to
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 16-Jun-2000 Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
> >
> > Is there any idea when we might get visual feedback to the
> > "size" attribute for table cells? Or even a horizontal scrollbar when
> > tables go off-screen? Currently editing tables is virtually
On 19-Jun-2000 Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
>>
>> Well you always can use Ctrl-Enter to split rows up into more virtural
>> rows and so it don't get so wide.
>
> Ah, but this is really quite a hack and doesn't do what I want. There's
> no text justification and I still have to try and work out
Is there any idea when we might get visual feedback to the
"size" attribute for table cells? Or even a horizontal scrollbar when
tables go off-screen? Currently editing tables is virtually impossible.
I use the size for when I have a longer piece of text for a table cell and
I believe there is
Is there any idea when we might get visual feedback to the
"size" attribute for table cells? Or even a horizontal scrollbar when
tables go off-screen? Currently editing tables is virtually impossible.
I use the size for when I have a longer piece of text for a table cell and
I believe there is
14 matches
Mail list logo
