Garst R. Reese wrote:
I just mailed it to you.
OK, it's now at:
http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uhwe/hollywood.tar.gz
or if you need a link page so you can shift-click it (unlikely in
this case):
http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uhwe/hollywood.html
I really hope this helps!
-Yours Malte
Garst,
Since I'm not on the mailing list, forward me the link when its posted and I'll
try to convert a smaller script for you. There may not be a way to automate lyx
but I *want* to use lyx and maybe I can write a python script that converts fd5
to your class... We'll see.
Without trying to
got it
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> I just mailed it to you.
OK, it's now at:
http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uhwe/hollywood.tar.gz
or if you need a link page so you can shift-click it (unlikely in
this case):
http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uhwe/hollywood.html
I really hope this helps!
-Yours
Garst,
Since I'm not on the mailing list, forward me the link when its posted and I'll
try to convert a smaller script for you. There may not be a way to automate lyx
but I *want* to use lyx and maybe I can write a python script that converts fd5
to your class... We'll see.
Without trying to
got it
Dear Garst,
Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
I would really like
it if you could test before I send them to the list. As things stand
now, you can insert a blockbreak after viewing and deciding where it
Richard Harris wrote:
Dear Garst,
Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
OK, wait for 1.2. I do not have an ftp site.
I would really like
it if you could test before I send them to the list. As things stand
Garst R. Reese wrote:
Richard Harris wrote:
Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
OK, wait for 1.2. I do not have an ftp site.
If that's a problem, Garst please send me the tar.gz, I'll put it up
where it can be
Malte Cornils wrote:
Garst R. Reese wrote:
Richard Harris wrote:
Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
OK, wait for 1.2. I do not have an ftp site.
If that's a problem, Garst please send me the tar.gz,
Garst,
I think everything is now tunable enough and documented within the
example script which will be in 1.2. If you know where the page breaks
come they are simple to insert with the new command More. The only
other thing should be tweaking baselineskip.
While I will look forward
Richard Harris wrote:
Garst,
I think everything is now tunable enough and documented within the
example script which will be in 1.2. If you know where the page breaks
come they are simple to insert with the new command More. The only
other thing should be tweaking baselineskip.
Dear Garst,
Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
I would really like
it if you could test before I send them to the list. As things stand
now, you can insert a blockbreak after viewing and deciding where it
Richard Harris wrote:
>
> Dear Garst,
>
>Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
>
> Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
OK, wait for 1.2. I do not have an ftp site.
>I would really like
>it if you could test before I send them to the list. As
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> Richard Harris wrote:
> >Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
> >
> > Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
> OK, wait for 1.2. I do not have an ftp site.
If that's a problem, Garst please send me the tar.gz, I'll put it up
where
Malte Cornils wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> >
> > Richard Harris wrote:
> > >Can you handle an 8bit (not mime) 10k tar.gz file?
> > >
> > > Not with Emacs RMAIL; I pull all files over ftp or http.
> > OK, wait for 1.2. I do not have an ftp site.
>
> If that's a problem, Garst please
Garst,
I think everything is now tunable enough and documented within the
example script which will be in 1.2. If you know where the page breaks
come they are simple to insert with the new command "More." The only
other thing should be tweaking baselineskip.
While I will look forward
Richard Harris wrote:
>
> Garst,
>I think everything is now tunable enough and documented within the
>example script which will be in 1.2. If you know where the page breaks
>come they are simple to insert with the new command "More." The only
>other thing should be tweaking
Richard Harris wrote:
Dear Garst,
The crucial thing is the blockbreak. If that has been implemented, just
put the files where I can hit them with http or ftp and I'll pull them.
I am - perhaps inconveniently - a die-hard Emacs RMAIL user and do not
handle mime. This was extremely
Richard Harris wrote:
>
> Dear Garst,
>
> The crucial thing is the blockbreak. If that has been implemented, just
> put the files where I can hit them with http or ftp and I'll pull them.
> I am - perhaps inconveniently - a die-hard Emacs RMAIL user and do not
> handle mime. This was
Richard Harris wrote:
Dear Garst,
You are not suggesting that the format acceptable from an oscar-winner has
anything to do with the requirements of agents who receive hundreds of spec
scripts every month and yearn to toss them in the trash?
Richard
Richard Harris wrote:
>
> Dear Garst,
>
> You are not suggesting that the format acceptable from an oscar-winner has
> anything to do with the requirements of agents who receive hundreds of spec
> scripts every month and yearn to toss them in the trash?
>
> Richard
>
Dear Garst,
You are not suggesting that the format acceptable from an oscar-winner has
anything to do with the requirements of agents who receive hundreds of spec
scripts every month and yearn to toss them in the trash?
Richard
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:43:03
Dear Garst,
You are not suggesting that the format acceptable from an oscar-winner has
anything to do with the requirements of agents who receive hundreds of spec
scripts every month and yearn to toss them in the trash?
Richard
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:43:03
Garst,
Final Draft and Script Thing simply are the standards used in Hollywood. Don't worry
about this. I'll figure it out and you are welcome to the results.
Sorry to have troubled you
---
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001
Richard Harris wrote:
Garst,
Final Draft and Script Thing simply are the standards used in Hollywood. Don't
worry about this. I'll figure it out and you are welcome to the results.
When I left Hollywood, the Selectric was still the standard :)
My apologies for being brusque in asking
Garst,
Final Draft and Script Thing simply are the standards used in Hollywood. Don't worry
about this. I'll figure it out and you are welcome to the results.
Sorry to have troubled you
---
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001
Richard Harris wrote:
>
> Garst,
>
> Final Draft and Script Thing simply are the standards used in Hollywood. Don't
>worry about this. I'll figure it out and you are welcome to the results.
>
When I left Hollywood, the Selectric was still the standard :)
My apologies for being brusque in
28 matches
Mail list logo
