Biblatex support is ready over at the features/biblatex2 branch.
Of course we do not support the whole range of biblatex's feature set
natively, but we already support all that natbib/jurabib does and
substially more (features I'd like to add eventually include
refsection/refsegements and
Le 07/01/2017 à 02:05, Richard Heck a écrit :
We (specifically, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) have recently made some changes
to the text rendering algorithms in LyX. We would appreciate it if those
who are able could compile and use the 2.2.x branch of the git
repository, so that these changes can
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 02:02:19PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> Is this a concern or should it be ignored?
>
> > Can be ignored IMHO.
>
> I'd prefer to convert them to the respective Unicode characters and do the
> replacement as preamble fallback macro definition.
Is there agreement this
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 11:41 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> > I see. But as the tests should correspond to "normal" LyX behaviour,
> > we
> > should rather
> >
> > a) fix the document: we can set a custom non-tex font
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 10:24 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> OK then I guess we should invert the tests (and perhaps continue the
> debate in a bug report). The other possibility is the change the
> regex
> that checks for lyx2lyx errors to ignore these ones but that doesn't
> seem like a
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:24 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I'd prefer to convert them to the respective Unicode characters and
> > do the
> > replacement as preamble fallback macro definition.
>
> Is there agreement this is the right thing to do?
No.
Jürgen
>
> Scott
signature.asc
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I doubt you will find a free suitable font that is expected to be
> > installed on every user's box so that "a user just clicking "'use
> > non-
> > TeX fonts' and compiling will get the correct result."
>
> Until now we pretty
Le 08/01/2017 à 18:00, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I tried the current master (commit 21259b66b5d36913aaf4dcded8aaac3254b04354) on
Mac.
It seems to be fast with Qt5 - but I’m not sure how to verify that.
One thing I’ve noticed: the images in text are not shown immediately when
scrolling
through
On 01/08/2017 11:51 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 08.01.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Paul A. Rubin :
At this point (having reloaded some programs), if I were to put the X-Apps at the
end of their respective vectors and reconfigure LyX, none of the X-Apps would be
selected. My
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 12:02 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I can try to fix this at the lyx2lyx level once I am out of the
> > biblatex tunnel.
>
> OK.
Well, it turned out to be a pretty stupid typo of mine.
Should be cured now.
Jürgen
>
> Scott
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:32AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> The only thing I noticed is a
> lot of messages
>
> QFile::remove: Empty or null file name
>
> in the calling shell window.
We noticed the same thing at
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 04:09:41PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:24 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > I'd prefer to convert them to the respective Unicode characters and
> > > do the
> > > replacement as preamble fallback macro definition.
> >
> > Is there
Am 08.01.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Paul A. Rubin :
>
> On 01/07/2017 11:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> My understanding of your issue was that suddenly you were left without _any_
>> pdf viewer. For this putting the new pdf viewer at the end of list should
>> work
>> and I am
Am 31.12.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 16/12/2016 à 16:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> I'd be interested to see other tests, especially on MacOS and Windows.
>
> Since there not much testing going on, I pushed the patch to master :)
> Notable
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 10:24 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > OK then I guess we should invert the tests (and perhaps continue the
> > debate in a bug report). The other possibility is the change the
> > regex
> > that
On 01/07/2017 11:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
My understanding of your issue was that suddenly you were left without _any_
pdf viewer. For this putting the new pdf viewer at the end of list should work
and I am happy to fix that.
You are right about my not having any viewer, but that was in part
On 9/01/2017 7:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote:
Thanks so much for doing this. I've not yet moved to biblatex myself,
but this will encourage me to give it a try.
Richard
On 01/08/2017 04:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Biblatex support is ready over at the features/biblatex2 branch.
Of
On 01/08/2017 12:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 11:51 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 08.01.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Paul A. Rubin :
>>>
>>> At this point (having reloaded some programs), if I were to put the
>>> X-Apps at the end of their respective vectors and
Am 08.01.2017 um 18:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 08/01/2017 à 18:00, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> I tried the current master (commit 21259b66b5d36913aaf4dcded8aaac3254b04354)
>> on Mac.
>> It seems to be fast with Qt5 - but I’m not sure how to verify that.
>>
>> One
Le 08/01/2017 à 18:59, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Ok, I don’t see this with current 2.2.x. AFAIK, you did the backport and
applied it there too.
The patch seems to be innocent :)
A bisect would be appreciated :) Note that I have noticed problems with
math previews not updating in master, I do
On 01/08/2017 09:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:32AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
>> The only thing I noticed is a
>> lot of messages
>>
>> QFile::remove: Empty or null file name
>>
>> in the calling shell window.
> We noticed the same thing at
>
On 01/08/2017 04:13 AM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> The branch, biblatex2, has been updated.
>
> - Log -
>
> commit 8319b3e9d615adc6b4b49a67308884400d20373f
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sun Jan 8 09:39:46
On 01/08/2017 02:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:45:57PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> On 01/08/2017 09:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:32AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>>>
The only thing I noticed is a
lot of messages
On 01/07/2017 06:55 PM, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Richard,
>
>>> I have used LyX on and off for many years and, working
>>> sporadically with TLDP [0], I have handled a few documents that
>>> were written in LyX. Thank you to the LyX team for your work on
>>> this tool over the years.
>>>
>>> I
Thanks so much for doing this. I've not yet moved to biblatex myself,
but this will encourage me to give it a try.
Richard
On 01/08/2017 04:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Biblatex support is ready over at the features/biblatex2 branch.
>
> Of course we do not support the whole range of
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:45:57PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 09:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:32AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> >
> >> The only thing I noticed is a
> >> lot of messages
> >>
> >> QFile::remove: Empty or null file name
>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 03:14:51PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 02:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:45:57PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/08/2017 09:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:32AM +, Jean-Pierre
Hello,
>> Yes, I can and I yes it works. I have attached the patch. I
>> have never touched C++ before, so this is just the dumbest thing
>> I could suggest, though it seems to do the trick.
>
>Thanks, I've committed these. They're sufficiently minor that we
>don't really NEED a license
On 01/08/2017 05:22 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 03:14:51PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 01/08/2017 02:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:45:57PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
On 01/08/2017 09:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:55 -0500 schrieb Richard Heck:
> > -# Excludes: jurabib | natbib | biblatex
> > +# Excludes: jurabib | natbib | biblatex | biblatex-natbib
>
> Is it actually possible to choose more than one of these? If not,
> these
> exclusion lines could be dropped altogether.
30 matches
Mail list logo