On 12 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ...wants to do the announcement for LyX 1.1.6?
>
> and don't forget to update the web site...
>
> go get at
>
> ftp.lyx.org or ftp.devel.lyx.org
Argh! It's looks like my doc CVS updates were about an hour late. Sigh.
Intro and the UG should be up to
Hi guys,
I noticed the cucumber escaped from CVS into the 1.1.6 distribution. It's
okay for CVS, but doesn't exactly convey the supposed seriousness of the
development effort. Please kill it. (No smileys.)
Now back to more late documentation ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> Did anybody know about this book on postgresql?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/awbook.html
>
> IMHO the link should be somewhere in the users site, in a section "Who
> uses LyX". There should be also some other success stories that
> have
I was about to tell someone in the User's list to RTFM, when I found that
the docs in 1.1.6 are ancient (at least two weeks old :-). Lars, did you
forget to update them before you created 1.1.6?
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
On 17 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I was about to tell someone in the User's list to RTFM, when I found that
> | the docs in 1.1.6 are ancient (at least two weeks old :-). Lars, did you
> | forget to update them before you created 1.1.6?
>
> Or have
On 18 Jan 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike> Ahem. It's in the FAQ - Section 1.2 "That's fine, but is it
> Mike> useful?". It's time to get the @#$% FAQ on the web page. Anyone
> Mike> want to make a whizzy thing to update an HTML page
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> This feels like simple question but I cannot find answer from LyX
> documents. How can I delete one line from multiline math equation?
>
> User Guide says M-e k but it doesn't work with 1.1.6. I couldn't find the
> command from reference manual.
I
Hi guys (and girls, if there are any reading),
Since you are munging the user layout and file formats right now, I would
like to repeat my request of a few months ago to change the name of
Insert->Figure to Insert->Graphic. The reasons are several:
1) A "figure" as defined by LaTeX does not
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please change this. I know it's only a trivial user interface issue, but
> it's a blaringly obvious one. I'd like to move us from LaTeXese to
> English.
And yes, I mean for 1.1.6fix1!
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't
On 24 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Since you are munging the user layout and file formats right now, I would
> | like to repeat my request of a few months ago to change the name of
> | Insert->Figure to Insert->Graphic. The reasons are several:
>
> I
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I agree completely with this. The current terminology is gobbledegook if
> you are not a latex guru. And I second the motion to do it for fix1.
> Even with Mike's excellent suggestions, but why not just Insert->Table
> for Insert->Tabular.
> The word
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
> 1) I renamed the 'Insert->Graphics' entry into 'Figure' (as it was before).
> Although there is (will be?) a new graphics inset, I suggest to stick to call
> it "Figure", to stay closer to LaTeX terminology.
NOO! I know Lars already responded, but I
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:42:31PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > Well, if "Figures" are called "Graphics", then my change my be of no
> > good. But then "Insert->Floats->Figure" and "Insert->Floats->Wide Figure"
> > should be renamed to
In the old days, if I typed "M-m g m m" I would get the greek letter mu
followed by an m - the usual symbol for micrometer (or micron). With
1.1.6fix1, if I type this sequence, the mu is created, but the cursor
stays at the front edge of the math box, so that the m is then placed in
front of the
Hi,
The figure caption in a float appears to be immune to justification
commands: setting left, right, center, or block has no effect. And worse,
the state it is in is "center", which is probably the worst of the 4
possibilities (well, maybe right would be worse). Reopening
Layout->Paragraph
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 15-Feb-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote:
> > However, it is my impression that 1.1.6 has been released a bit too early
>
> Well the problem is that we wouldn't have found all the problems with
> the tabulars so fast if we wouldn't have released it to
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 16-Feb-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I've been trying to figure out a polite way to say this for some time.
> > Juergen just pushed me over the edge :-)
>
> Well you shouldn't have put that smily there on a friday, you're a heretic! ;)
>
>
On 5 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I tried the "benchmark" a bit here, and the times in successive rune
> fluctuate enough that I do not see how you can interpret them...
This wins the "Cool Typo" award. When reading your (the developers')
discussions of compilers, pragmas, etc. my
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, John Levon wrote:
> Why do we have this ? It seems a bit ad hoc. Is it just for
> the convenience of the doc writers or something ?
Put on your asbestos suit! John Weiss is going to hunt you down and smack
you with his small fish :-) (Find a message from him and look at his
On 29 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jules> It's a relief someone agrees with me!
> Jules> Yes, M-p asterisk would seem like a sensible set of
> Jules> bindings to me..
> Would you have time to review the bindings and propose an
On 29 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Mike> The default user interface has to stop changing before the Doc
> Mike> Team can update everything. Don't stop changing it yet, but
> Mike> expect there to be problems until 1.2.0pre is declared ready,
> Mike> and everyone agrees the interface
In spite of my whining, I thought I'd sneak in an attempt to compile
Angus' natbib branch, since he went to the effort to merge it with the
latest main CVS branch. I cruise along okay until I get smacked with the
following:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../..
On Wed, 30 May 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It's a Mandrake 8.0 OS with gcc-2.96. Let me know if I'm doing something
>
> Mandrake 8.0 comes with some version of RH gcc 2.96 ? Yuck !
> What's the RPM version ? I wonder which RH version it's based on.
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In spite of my whining, I thought I'd sneak in an attempt to compile
> > Angus' natbib branch, since he went to the effort to merge it with the
> > latest main CVS branch. I cruise along okay
Hi,
Still playing with the natbib branch. I was able to compile it
successfully once Angus finished his update :-) Gcc-2.96 seems to have
worked okay. However, now when I open a new/existing document and start
typing, I get a "Unknown function" error printed at the bottom and no text
inserted. I
On Thu, 31 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> typing, I get a "Unknown function" error printed at the bottom and no text
> inserted. I can open existing documents, but can't type new text. Any
> ideas?
Lars wrote back about a possible bad key bindings file. That was it. I had
an old ~/.lyx-cvs
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Compare also with the natbib work that lives on a branch: I don't think
> Angus has gotten much feedback on that. This in turns results in less
> entuisiasm from the developer, and there is a real fear that the work will
> never be merged.
On 7 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Picture preview does not work with ghostscript 6.00--6.50
I haven't had any problem with 6.01. Later versions, yes ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
Hello Jeff,
I'm forwarding your email to the LyX Developer's list since I haven't a
clue what might be hanging you up. Hopefully someone there will know.
Also, please let us know what version of LyX you are using, whether you
compiled it yourself, and if so, what xforms library you are using,
On 12 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
...wants to do the announcement for LyX 1.1.6?
and don't forget to update the web site...
go get at
ftp.lyx.org or ftp.devel.lyx.org
Argh! It's looks like my doc CVS updates were about an hour late. Sigh.
Intro and the UG should be up to date
Hi guys,
I noticed the cucumber escaped from CVS into the 1.1.6 distribution. It's
okay for CVS, but doesn't exactly convey the supposed seriousness of the
development effort. Please kill it. (No smileys.)
Now back to more late documentation ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
Did anybody know about this book on postgresql?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/awbook.html
IMHO the link should be somewhere in the users site, in a section "Who
uses LyX". There should be also some other success stories that
have been
I was about to tell someone in the User's list to RTFM, when I found that
the docs in 1.1.6 are ancient (at least two weeks old :-). Lars, did you
forget to update them before you created 1.1.6?
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
On 17 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I was about to tell someone in the User's list to RTFM, when I found that
| the docs in 1.1.6 are ancient (at least two weeks old :-). Lars, did you
| forget to update them before you created 1.1.6?
Or have you been
On 18 Jan 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Mike" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Ahem. It's in the FAQ - Section 1.2 "That's fine, but is it
Mike useful?". It's time to get the @#$% FAQ on the web page. Anyone
Mike want to make a whizzy thing to update an HTML page automatically
Mike
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
This feels like simple question but I cannot find answer from LyX
documents. How can I delete one line from multiline math equation?
User Guide says M-e k but it doesn't work with 1.1.6. I couldn't find the
command from reference manual.
I noticed
Hi guys (and girls, if there are any reading),
Since you are munging the user layout and file formats right now, I would
like to repeat my request of a few months ago to change the name of
Insert-Figure to Insert-Graphic. The reasons are several:
1) A "figure" as defined by LaTeX does not
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please change this. I know it's only a trivial user interface issue, but
it's a blaringly obvious one. I'd like to move us from LaTeXese to
English.
And yes, I mean for 1.1.6fix1!
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have
On 24 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Since you are munging the user layout and file formats right now, I would
| like to repeat my request of a few months ago to change the name of
| Insert-Figure to Insert-Graphic. The reasons are several:
I agree with
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Garst R. Reese wrote:
I agree completely with this. The current terminology is gobbledegook if
you are not a latex guru. And I second the motion to do it for fix1.
Even with Mike's excellent suggestions, but why not just Insert-Table
for Insert-Tabular.
The word tabular
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
1) I renamed the 'Insert-Graphics' entry into 'Figure' (as it was before).
Although there is (will be?) a new graphics inset, I suggest to stick to call
it "Figure", to stay closer to LaTeX terminology.
NOO! I know Lars already responded, but I want
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:42:31PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
Well, if "Figures" are called "Graphics", then my change my be of no
good. But then "Insert-Floats-Figure" and "Insert-Floats-Wide Figure"
should be renamed to "Graphics" and
In the old days, if I typed "M-m g m m" I would get the greek letter mu
followed by an m - the usual symbol for micrometer (or micron). With
1.1.6fix1, if I type this sequence, the mu is created, but the cursor
stays at the front edge of the math box, so that the m is then placed in
front of the
Hi,
The figure caption in a float appears to be immune to justification
commands: setting left, right, center, or block has no effect. And worse,
the state it is in is "center", which is probably the worst of the 4
possibilities (well, maybe right would be worse). Reopening
Layout-Paragraph
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 15-Feb-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote:
However, it is my impression that 1.1.6 has been released a bit too early
Well the problem is that we wouldn't have found all the problems with
the tabulars so fast if we wouldn't have released it to public,
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 16-Feb-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to figure out a polite way to say this for some time.
Juergen just pushed me over the edge :-)
Well you shouldn't have put that smily there on a friday, you're a heretic! ;)
On 5 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I tried the "benchmark" a bit here, and the times in successive rune
fluctuate enough that I do not see how you can interpret them...
This wins the "Cool Typo" award. When reading your (the developers')
discussions of compilers, pragmas, etc. my head
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, John Levon wrote:
Why do we have this ? It seems a bit ad hoc. Is it just for
the convenience of the doc writers or something ?
Put on your asbestos suit! John Weiss is going to hunt you down and smack
you with his small fish :-) (Find a message from him and look at his
On 29 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jules == Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jules It's a relief someone agrees with me!
Jules Yes, M-p asterisk num would seem like a sensible set of
Jules bindings to me..
Would you have time to review the bindings and propose an update?
[...]
On 29 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Mike The default user interface has to stop changing before the Doc
Mike Team can update everything. Don't stop changing it yet, but
Mike expect there to be problems until 1.2.0pre is declared ready,
Mike and everyone agrees the interface will be
In spite of my whining, I thought I'd sneak in an attempt to compile
Angus' natbib branch, since he went to the effort to merge it with the
latest main CVS branch. I cruise along okay until I get smacked with the
following:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../..
On Wed, 30 May 2001, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a Mandrake 8.0 OS with gcc-2.96. Let me know if I'm doing something
Mandrake 8.0 comes with some version of RH gcc 2.96 ? Yuck !
What's the RPM version ? I wonder which RH version it's based on. Any
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In spite of my whining, I thought I'd sneak in an attempt to compile
Angus' natbib branch, since he went to the effort to merge it with the
latest main CVS branch. I cruise along okay until I
Hi,
Still playing with the natbib branch. I was able to compile it
successfully once Angus finished his update :-) Gcc-2.96 seems to have
worked okay. However, now when I open a new/existing document and start
typing, I get a Unknown function error printed at the bottom and no text
inserted. I
On Thu, 31 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
typing, I get a Unknown function error printed at the bottom and no text
inserted. I can open existing documents, but can't type new text. Any
ideas?
Lars wrote back about a possible bad key bindings file. That was it. I had
an old ~/.lyx-cvs
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
Compare also with the natbib work that lives on a branch: I don't think
Angus has gotten much feedback on that. This in turns results in less
entuisiasm from the developer, and there is a real fear that the work will
never be merged. This is
On 7 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Picture preview does not work with ghostscript 6.00--6.50
I haven't had any problem with 6.01. Later versions, yes ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
Hello Jeff,
I'm forwarding your email to the LyX Developer's list since I haven't a
clue what might be hanging you up. Hopefully someone there will know.
Also, please let us know what version of LyX you are using, whether you
compiled it yourself, and if so, what xforms library you are using,
58 matches
Mail list logo
