Re: #10746: Incorporating new Japanese layouts (BX Class)

2017-09-19 Thread K. Yokota 
> Let's envisage that for 2.4.0, if you think it's worth it (but let's
> start rather soon).

OK, then let's start with it, since two classes usable with uplatex, bxjs
and ujarticle classes, have different document layouts.

> I think it is more difficult. We would need to take care that uplatex
> (rather than platex) and upbibtex are used with that class. Since also
> the encoding differs, it would probably require an implementation
> similar than platex.

That behind-the-scene working might be out of my reach, but I'm going to
review the document class and post a candidate layout file.

Thanks for your help,

Koji

Re: #10746: Incorporating new Japanese layouts (BX Class)

2017-09-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller 
Am Dienstag, den 19.09.2017, 01:50 +0900 schrieb K. Yokota:
> Jürgen, sorry to have missed your question.
> 
> Actually, I simply hesitated to include ujclasses because, judging
> from the circulating information on web, upLaTeX seems a room for a
> change and wondered if it is good thing to add another line in the
> long dropdown list of document classes.

This is no problem.

> Supporting ujclass is simple -- simply I can copy jarticle layout
> file modifying the first line.

I think it is more difficult. We would need to take care that uplatex
(rather than platex) and upbibtex are used with that class. Since also
the encoding differs, it would probably require an implementation
similar than platex.

> Shall I do so? If there is no problem in supporting it, supporting
> broader classes would be better.

Let's envisage that for 2.4.0, if you think it's worth it (but let's
start rather soon).

Jürgen 

> Koji


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: #10746: Incorporating new Japanese layouts (BX Class)

2017-09-18 Thread K. Yokota 
Jürgen, sorry to have missed your question.

Actually, I simply hesitated to include ujclasses because, judging from the
circulating information on web, upLaTeX seems a room for a change and
wondered if it is good thing to add another line in the long dropdown list
of document classes.

Supporting ujclass is simple -- simply I can copy jarticle layout file
modifying the first line.

Shall I do so? If there is no problem in supporting it, supporting broader
classes would be better.

Koji


2017-09-07 19:14 GMT+09:00 LyX Ticket Tracker :

> #10746: Incorporating new Japanese layouts (BX Class)
> -+
>  Reporter:  yokota   |   Owner:  rgheck
>  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  fixedinmaster
>  Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  2.3.0
> Component:  layout   | Version:  2.3.0dev
>  Severity:  normal   |  Resolution:
>  Keywords:   |
> -+
>
> Comment (by spitz):
>
>  BTW is there a reason why we don't support {{{upLaTeX}}} and the
>  {{{ujclasses}}}?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: 
> The LyX Project 
> LyX -- The Document Processor
>