Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-19 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-03-07, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the > output of en- and em-dashes. ... > With this patch, documents produced with older versions work again > as intended Not always: The proposed patch restores the previous behaviour

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-19 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:32:01PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:41:20PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2017-03-18, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > > ... > > > > >> > I think we have to make

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-18 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:41:20PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2017-03-18, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > ... > > >> > I think we have to make do with the ugly zero-space inset. > > >> Or special/invisible unicode

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-18 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-03-18, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: ... >> > I think we have to make do with the ugly zero-space inset. >> Or special/invisible unicode characters could be made visible by changing >> the character before painting. >

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-18 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 18/03/2017 à 14:59, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > > Apparently, nobody has a preference, so I am going to commit the > > > second patch, i.e., the

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-18 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 18/03/2017 à 14:59, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: Apparently, nobody has a preference, so I am going to commit the second patch, i.e., the one using a zero-width space character. On second thoughts, I am not sure this is the

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-18 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Apparently, nobody has a preference, so I am going to commit the > second patch, i.e., the one using a zero-width space character. On second thoughts, I am not sure this is the best choice. I just verified that this character

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-17 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-03-07, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the > output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as > the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in > old

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-17 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:48:41AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the > output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as > the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in > old documents and